Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"Contempt of Congress" is the same as an indictment for perjury? Where ? And your IRS claims.....quite laughable....someone is going to be charged with perjury and "a deal was struck" to keep them on their job? Who struck that deal? What does the deal look like? What could possibly be the motivation to strike such a deal?AS I HAVE REPEATEDLY DONE OVER AND OVER IN THE PAST EVERY TIME YOU HAVE ASKED ME TO DO THIS VERY SAME THING, I WILL BE GLAD TO. HERE'S A COUPLE ... AGAIN:Share with us the indictments for perjury for any/all of those people you listed.
OBAMA US AG ERIC HOLDER
Holder was caught perjuring himself SEVERAL times ad withholding information during his attempt under oath to continue to cover up Obama's illegal arming of Mexican Drug cartels - his Fast and Furious Scandal. For his crime, instead of being Indicted, Holder became the 1st US AG in US history to be Censured in a bi-partisan vote in 2012.
"The attorney general Eric Holder has become the first sitting member of a president's cabinet in US history to be held in contempt of Congress after Republicans vented their fury over a bungled gun-tracking investigation."
- Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress after historic vote
"The Republican-led House of Representatives on Thursday voted to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt for failing to disclose internal Justice Department documents in response to a subpoena. It was the first time in American history that Congress has imposed the sanction on a sitting member of a president’s cabinet."
- Fast and Furious Contempt Citation for Holder
IRS CHIEF JOHN KOSKINEN
Koskinen was caught committing perjury and obstructing the investigation into the IRS illegally being used to target American citizens who opposed President Obama politically. Impeachment processes were begun but a deal was struck before Impeachment to allow Koskinen to remain head of the IRS.
JAMES CLAPPER:
"The passage of more than three years hasn’t cooled the insistence in certain quarters that Clapper face charges for an admittedly false statement to Congress in March 2013, when he responded, “No, sir" and "not wittingly” to a question about whether the National Security Agency was collecting “any type of data at all” on millions of Americans."
"About three months after making that claim, documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed the answer was untruthful and that the NSA was in fact collecting in bulk domestic call records, along with various internet communications."
- https://www.usnews.com/news/article...esume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges
Yes, it is obvious, and even has been proven, that Hillary was protected from Indictment.nobody is above the law .. nobody hung anything criminal on Clinton.
Recent exposed documents show Comey made the decision not to recommend indictment for Hillary before the investigation was even complete.
You lose...but keep that opinion coming.
You keep[ spinning and wiggling like a worm or a hook, trying to wrestle victory from each defeat. You asked for evidence of ANY of the Democrats' crimes. You got it, complete with links / factual data...AGAIN. You wait a couple weeks then repeat this process all over again."Contempt of Congress" is the same as an indictment for perjury? Where ? And your IRS claims.....quite laughable....someone is going to be charged with perjury and "a deal was struck" to keep them on their job? Who struck that deal? What does the deal look like? What could possibly be the motivation to strike such a deal?AS I HAVE REPEATEDLY DONE OVER AND OVER IN THE PAST EVERY TIME YOU HAVE ASKED ME TO DO THIS VERY SAME THING, I WILL BE GLAD TO. HERE'S A COUPLE ... AGAIN:Share with us the indictments for perjury for any/all of those people you listed.
OBAMA US AG ERIC HOLDER
Holder was caught perjuring himself SEVERAL times ad withholding information during his attempt under oath to continue to cover up Obama's illegal arming of Mexican Drug cartels - his Fast and Furious Scandal. For his crime, instead of being Indicted, Holder became the 1st US AG in US history to be Censured in a bi-partisan vote in 2012.
"The attorney general Eric Holder has become the first sitting member of a president's cabinet in US history to be held in contempt of Congress after Republicans vented their fury over a bungled gun-tracking investigation."
- Eric Holder held in contempt of Congress after historic vote
"The Republican-led House of Representatives on Thursday voted to hold Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. in contempt for failing to disclose internal Justice Department documents in response to a subpoena. It was the first time in American history that Congress has imposed the sanction on a sitting member of a president’s cabinet."
- Fast and Furious Contempt Citation for Holder
IRS CHIEF JOHN KOSKINEN
Koskinen was caught committing perjury and obstructing the investigation into the IRS illegally being used to target American citizens who opposed President Obama politically. Impeachment processes were begun but a deal was struck before Impeachment to allow Koskinen to remain head of the IRS.
JAMES CLAPPER:
"The passage of more than three years hasn’t cooled the insistence in certain quarters that Clapper face charges for an admittedly false statement to Congress in March 2013, when he responded, “No, sir" and "not wittingly” to a question about whether the National Security Agency was collecting “any type of data at all” on millions of Americans."
"About three months after making that claim, documents leaked by former NSA contractor Edward Snowden revealed the answer was untruthful and that the NSA was in fact collecting in bulk domestic call records, along with various internet communications."
- https://www.usnews.com/news/article...esume-calls-for-james-clapper-perjury-charges
Once again, the only one saying stupid shit like that is YOU. Bwuhahaha....Yes, it is obvious, and even has been proven, that Hillary was protected from Indictment.nobody is above the law .. nobody hung anything criminal on Clinton.
Recent exposed documents show Comey made the decision not to recommend indictment for Hillary before the investigation was even complete.
You lose...but keep that opinion coming.
so what youre saying is Gowdy was too incompetent to get a grand jury much less an indictment after 8 hearings ..
correct ?
That's a damn good question, I know for a fact congress sent a referral on the bitch to the DOJ, I guess some people are just above the law. Of course you and your ilk are only concerned when you see an advantage politically.
You are always saying "covering for Hillary". Covering what?
The GOP controlled the entire government. Even someone so determined to be one stupid fuk knows there was no way to "cover something up".
There just wasn't anything there to cover up. Duh!
So suck a dirty diaper
Ahhhhh, the beginning of a Shakespeare love sonnet???
If they lied to the Republican majority in Congress, why haven't they been indicted?Well, yesterday Donny, Jr. had a 5 hour interview with the Senate Judiciary Committee, that included some senators. Democrat senator, Coons...who was in attendance at this inquiry, submitted a not too subtle response directed not only at the press, by Donny himself.
The note from the Democratic lawmaker continued to simply lay out the legal statute for lying to Congress.
"It is important to remember that anyone who testifies in front of a Senate committee is under the restrictions of the False Statements statute that says material false statements to Congress are criminal and punishable with fines or imprisonment or both," Coons said in the statement.
Coons touts perjury law after Trump Jr. testimony - CNNPolitics
Although Donny "thinks" that his responses, with several "I don't remember" (reminiscent of Reagan's responses to the Iran-Contra inquiries) may have satisfied the questioners, Coons' note indicates that Donny was not completely forthright, and that upcoming testimonies by Kushner, Manafrot and WH staffers may entrap Donny with perjury charges.
LMAO, the bitch lied to congress, Comey lied to congress, Clapper lied to congress and not a damn thing is being done. Now the commies think perjury is something serious, give me a fucking break. LMAO
.
That's a damn good question, I know for a fact congress sent a referral on the bitch to the DOJ, I guess some people are just above the law. Of course you and your ilk are only concerned when you see an advantage politically.
.
nobody is above the law .. nobody hung anything criminal on Clinton.
ergo;
you dont know shit for facts.
You keep[ spinning and wiggling like a worm or a hook, trying to wrestle victory from each defeat. You asked for evidence of ANY of the Democrats' crimes. You got it, complete with links / factual data...AGAIN. You wait a couple weeks then repeat this process all over again.
In Comey's July statement, he laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence against the bitch in the handling of classified information. That is the legal threshold for prosecution by law.
.
More leftist traitor sewage. Wasted thread. Move on.Well, yesterday Donny, Jr. had a 5 hour interview with the Senate Judiciary Committee, that included some senators. Democrat senator, Coons...who was in attendance at this inquiry, submitted a not too subtle response directed not only at the press, by Donny himself.
The note from the Democratic lawmaker continued to simply lay out the legal statute for lying to Congress.
"It is important to remember that anyone who testifies in front of a Senate committee is under the restrictions of the False Statements statute that says material false statements to Congress are criminal and punishable with fines or imprisonment or both," Coons said in the statement.
Coons touts perjury law after Trump Jr. testimony - CNNPolitics
Although Donny "thinks" that his responses, with several "I don't remember" (reminiscent of Reagan's responses to the Iran-Contra inquiries) may have satisfied the questioners, Coons' note indicates that Donny was not completely forthright, and that upcoming testimonies by Kushner, Manafrot and WH staffers may entrap Donny with perjury charges.
In Comey's July statement, he laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence against the bitch in the handling of classified information. That is the legal threshold for prosecution by law.
.
NOPE, Not for a criminal violation requiring "beyond a reasonable doubt", and "criminal intent to commit"
Maybe enough for drunk driving, or negligent homicide.
Yes, it is obvious, and even has been proven, that Hillary was protected from Indictment.nobody is above the law .. nobody hung anything criminal on Clinton.
Recent exposed documents show Comey made the decision not to recommend indictment for Hillary before the investigation was even complete.
You lose...but keep that opinion coming.
so what youre saying is Gowdy was too incompetent to get a grand jury much less an indictment after 8 hearings ..
correct ?
In Comey's July statement, he laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence against the bitch in the handling of classified information. That is the legal threshold for prosecution by law.
.
NOPE, Not for a criminal violation requiring "beyond a reasonable doubt", and "criminal intent to commit"
Maybe enough for drunk driving, or negligent homicide.
A submariner was jailed for a year for just taking a couple of pictures for his own use, he had no intent either, but he knew better, just like the bitch.
.
In Comey's July statement, he laid out a prima facie case for gross negligence against the bitch in the handling of classified information. That is the legal threshold for prosecution by law. Had a real investigation been done with the aid of a grand jury they bitch would be behind bars right now. If I were you, I wouldn't be doing much crowing, the statute of limitations hasn't expired yet. Oh and there still that congressional perjury referral at the DOJ that hasn't been acted on yet.
