strollingbones
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #41
my point is simply....there is some truth to this matter...and who the hell makes a weapon that the safety must be disengaged to unload the rife?
i think the dod continues to buy them and use them with modification cause they are a solid rifle. no one is advocating removing the 700 but simply thinking that the modification needed to make them safe should be done at the factory...and i think if its proven remington willingly and knowingly continued to manufactor with this defect then yes they must face the consequences of their actions.
i think the dod continues to buy them and use them with modification cause they are a solid rifle. no one is advocating removing the 700 but simply thinking that the modification needed to make them safe should be done at the factory...and i think if its proven remington willingly and knowingly continued to manufactor with this defect then yes they must face the consequences of their actions.