Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
it certainly is, so what was it?and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.
It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.
You or I are not privy to such information.
There had to be cause if there was indeed a warrant. That means Trump is in some shady shit.
You are so naive. The cause was snowflakes pissed off at Hillary losing.
Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?If, IF a FISA warrant was issued, it was done so legally with the appropriate probable cause that is required. Why would that be grim for Obama? It seems more like it would not bode well for Trump or his people.
It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.
You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?
And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.
ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.
Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.
Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking
Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.
"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.
In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.
The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."
A legal warrant is going to be Obama's downfall?
Goddam that's funny.
#1) You don't know that it was legal.
#2) Even a legal warrant can be obtained for nefarious purposes.
Your view that the courts and law enforcement agencies can do know wrong is the ultimate in naivete.
What law did Trump break? Even if what Obama did is technically legal, it's still an outrage. No president would be allowed to wire tap the home of the opposition party for any reason. Of course, when did Obama ever let trivialities like the Bill of Rights get in his way?Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.
Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking
Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.
"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.
In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.
The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."
Post a link. LOL
It's not Obama who broke the law. The cheetos days are numbered.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.and what would be the probable cause? have you seen any yet?
It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.
You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?
And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.
ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.
There is no evidence of a wiretap, dope.
What law did Trump break? Even if what Obama did is technically legal, it's still an outrage. No president would be allowed to wire tap the home of the opposition party for any reason. Of course, when did Obama ever let trivialities like the Bill of Rights get in his way?Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.
Report: A FISA Warrant Was Issued in October to Investigate Russian Hacking
Investigative journalists Sara Carter (formerly of the Washington Times, the Washington Examiner, and The Blaze) and John Solomon (formerly of the the Washington Post, the Washington Times, and AP) spoke to sources close to the investigation who have been "watching in horror" at the politicization of intelligence since the election, and wanted to set the record straight.
"What we don't know is who was connected to that FISA," Carter said on Sean Hannity's show Wednesday night. "What was that FISA looking at? That is very highly classified. Nobody wants to talk about that particular FISA, right now. They said it did have to do with the Russian hacking on a very broad level, but it didn't hone in directly on Trump is what I was told," she said.
In addition to the FISA warrant in October, the FBI obtained a separate warrant that same month to look into a computer server tied to then-candidate Donald Trump's businesses in Trump Towers (but not located in Trump Towers). According to the report, the feds used traditional investigative techniques to examine allegations of computer activity tied to two Russian banks and there had been no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.
The FBI quickly concluded that "the computer activity in question involved no nefarious contacts, bank transactions or encrypted communications with the Russians."
Post a link. LOL
It's not Obama who broke the law. The cheetos days are numbered.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
What law did Trump break?
It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?Things are looking grim for Obama and the Dims. Evidence of the October FISA warrant has turned up. It won't be long until the actual thing is published, and then Obama's goose is cooked.
You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
Who knows? That's private, so that the investigators can continue to do surveillance on their suspects, and if nothing comes of it, then the people under surveillance are unaware and all of their neighbors and the Public don't know so that the innocent are not unfairly judged by them.It's required to obtain a FISA warrant, fool.
You didn't answer the question. What would be the probable cause?
And if the public does find out due to justice dept leaks, and nothing is found, then the justice department owes a public apology to the person....imo.
ROFL! It's already been made public, so how is it "private?" Leaking the information is a criminal offense. A lot more than just an "apology" is required. Putting a wire tap on the opposition candidate is a serious offense. It requires a lot more justification than just some suspicions from some butthurt snowflakes.
There is no evidence of a wiretap, dope.
There's plenty of evidence, dope. You just refuse to accept it.
Knowing the ex-prez is the reason we know it's true. Obama is a liar who wiped his ass on the Constitution numerous times.The OP link is not the original story. I can't tell you how many times I have told these tards to GO TO THE SOURCE.
You can read the source here: FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
It turns out very badly for the tard who started this topic. In fact, the tard represents EXACTLY what they are talking about:
“We have people spouting off who don’t know the difference between FISA surveillance and a wiretap or a counterintelligence probe versus a special prosecutor, and it has hurts our ability to get to the truth and has wrongly created the impression that intelligence officials have a political agenda,” said one source directly familiar with the drama.
Many of the leaks have surfaced since former President Barack Obama in his waning days in office had his intelligence leadership brief a wider than normal audience about the sensitive Russia surveillance. Those leaks have created a false narrative that the FBI has been predominantly focused on Trump ties to Russia, officials said.
In fact, any FBI activity involving the president’s associates or advisers was mostly ancillary to a wider counterintelligence probe into Russian efforts to influence the election or curry favor with U.S. figures, the sources said.
So, you see, the story that Russia interfered in our election is valid. The claim by Trump that Obama tapped his phone is utter bullshit.
Everybody clear now?
Thanks for the link to facts.
The tip off that the op is fiction (besides the poster) was seeing the name Hannity.
And of course, knowing our ex-prez.
Wishful thinking on the RWNJs part.
Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?
You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
In other words, you have nothing to counter my post with.It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
Your post is evidence of your profound retardation. Do you post from a group home?
Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.And your alleged mind bleev's this means Obama personally ordered Trump's phone lines to be tapped...how?
You know the FISA court is not Obama...right, retard?
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
Looking grim? How so ?
Trump hobnobbing with the Russian spies is looking grim.
Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
Please keep you wet dreams to yourself. That's really more information than we want to know.Trump will be proven to be a Manchurian Candidate.It doesn't matter whether he ordered it. One of his servile toadies could have ordered it without being asked, there's no doubt that new knew about it. He failed to do anything about it, and then he took steps to make sure the information was leaked. It doesn't look good for him.
Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
Louise MenschEXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
By Louise Mensch
10:18 pm, November 7, 2016
EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
Louise Mensch
I thought all the snowflake douche bags were denying that any such warrant was never issued.Louise MenschEXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
By Louise Mensch
10:18 pm, November 7, 2016
EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia
✔@LouiseMensch
Breitbart and Russia are 100% linked. Bannon has been pushing Russia's line since Andrew Breitbart "died suddenly" https://twitter.com/zackstanton/status/835151361755000832 …
10:42 AM - 24 Feb 2017
✔@LouiseMensch
I absolutely believe that Andrew Breitbart was murdered by Putin, just as the founder of RT was murdered by Putin.
10:44 AM - 24 Feb 2017
In other words, you have nothing to counter my post with.Why would he need to do something about a valid investigation?
What makes you think it's "valid," because you hate Trump?
Because a FISA warrant requires probable cause. If a warrant was in fact obtained, that standard would have been met and deemed therefore valid.
I don't know WTF you're talking about.
It has already been explained to you that getting a FISA warrant is easier than falling down. It means nothing. It's really just evidence that the government committed a crime by wire tapping the headquarters of the opposition party. You snowflakes all blubber incessantly about Russia "hacking the election," but here is clear proof that Obama hacked the election.
Your post is evidence of your profound retardation. Do you post from a group home?
