Reasonable
Gold Member
- Feb 9, 2017
- 19,787
- 2,401
- 290
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #321
You don't follow the news. You're woefully uniformed so You have no idea what you're talking about. You actually think BLOGGERS are good sources. Lol. They're accountable to no one. Professional journalists are.Keep telling yourself that.You obviously don't understand what the word FACT means. How can you.. you never use them.Your complete and total response, when asked why you think the investigation is struggling, is to say that it hasn't yet produced and leaked results directly incriminating Trump? What a terribly weak bit of pap. For one, for you to think that shmoes like us would be privy to the evidence possessed by Mueller is pure fantasy. Second, the investigation is still young and ongoing...thus it is absurd to claim that it will end up a dud, just because it has not produced all of the results already.
You provided no support for your claim, while all of the facts available (I listed a few) stand opposed to it. I rate your claim "Grade A, self-soothing bullshit".
How so? A president would be a crown jewl in Mullers crown. If he had him he WOULD HAVE him. He doesn’t. It’s a fact.
None of the following are "facts:"
- "may be"
- "reportedly"
- "could signal"
- "identities could not be revealed"
Has Flynn flipped? Ex-adviser halts contact with Trump team, signalling cooperation with Mueller’s Russia probe
The decision by former national security adviser Michael Flynn is a potentially ominous sign for the White House
Did Flynn flip? Ex-Trump adviser signals cooperation with Mueller
Leftwing papers have been predicting Trump's impeachment ever since he was elected.
<YAWN!>
You're just like your incompetent baboon of apresident. Anti 1st amendment and preach there are no facts... only what the pathological liar tells you and he gets his information fromFox News