Report: Half of staff may quit LA Times if right-wing Koch brothers buy paper

[TheOldSchool]

Ohhhhhhhh....so you like emoticons....here, I have one for you!!!

As for the Koch brothers possibly buying out the LA Times and several other newspapers, that would be great...at least it would give a heavyweight altenative to the Democrat Party's stenographers in the NY Times, SF Chronicle and other leftist proapanda rags. Hopefully this will happen, it could be the beginning of the end of the lefts domination in the media. The sight and sound of the abject panic of lefties over the possibility of this happening is a thing of absolute beauty.

Hahaha! No comeback. Have a seat, bitch.

Oh right because that clown's post addressed anything that I was talking about so it deserved a response

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It's only OK when Progressives like Buffet and Soros control the media

 

[Truthmatters]

Kathleen Miles: If Koch Brothers Buy LA Times, Half of Staff May Quit (VIDEO)


they should ask the readers how many would stop taking the paper.

I would end my account

 

[Truthmatters]

Call their bluff. Wherever you stand politically, we can all agree on that, right? If you’re a liberal, you want to see the fair, balanced, impartial LA Times newsroom rise as one and walk out in protest of having to work for libertarian oligarKKKs. If you’re a conservative, you want them gone for different reasons, partly as a smoking gun of bias and partly because it’ll clear the decks to hire more neutral reporters. And if they don’t walk out, that’s okay — their cheap bravado will have been exposed in all its cheapness.

Call their bluff. Break the left’s media monopoly. Then rename the paper the “Los Angeles Kochtopus,” just to spite them.

Report: Half of staff may quit LA Times if right-wing Koch brothers buy paper « Hot Air

Good let them find another damn job.. Babies

that is because you have no morals and opperate wtih only money in mind.


They will distroy the paper and lose money if they buy it.

many many many will stop the paper.


a New one would take its place

 

[ClosedCaption]

It's only OK when Progressives like Buffet and Soros control the media

No, it's not...looking for another excuse?

See, you pretend Progressives want that in order to excuse you being ok with the Cons controlling the media.

You wont say you're ok with Rich guys controlling our media, you just cant find the outrage to muster up, so you strike out at imaginary bad ppl who coincidentally are doing the same thing you are as an excuse

 

[Claudette]

Call their bluff. Wherever you stand politically, we can all agree on that, right? If you’re a liberal, you want to see the fair, balanced, impartial LA Times newsroom rise as one and walk out in protest of having to work for libertarian oligarKKKs. If you’re a conservative, you want them gone for different reasons, partly as a smoking gun of bias and partly because it’ll clear the decks to hire more neutral reporters. And if they don’t walk out, that’s okay — their cheap bravado will have been exposed in all its cheapness.

Call their bluff. Break the left’s media monopoly. Then rename the paper the “Los Angeles Kochtopus,” just to spite them.

Report: Half of staff may quit LA Times if right-wing Koch brothers buy paper « Hot Air

What do you mean only half will quitt??

I thought the whole paper was nothing but lefty loonies??

 

[Truthseeker420]

Is okay. They can get endless UE and foodstamps and an obama phone

Welfare recipients, and others, can receive a free cell phone, but the program is not funded by the government or taxpayer money, as the e-mail alleges. And it’s hardly new.

FactCheck.org : The Obama Phone?

 

[bripat9643]

Call their bluff. Wherever you stand politically, we can all agree on that, right? If you’re a liberal, you want to see the fair, balanced, impartial LA Times newsroom rise as one and walk out in protest of having to work for libertarian oligarKKKs. If you’re a conservative, you want them gone for different reasons, partly as a smoking gun of bias and partly because it’ll clear the decks to hire more neutral reporters. And if they don’t walk out, that’s okay — their cheap bravado will have been exposed in all its cheapness.

Call their bluff. Break the left’s media monopoly. Then rename the paper the “Los Angeles Kochtopus,” just to spite them.

Report: Half of staff may quit LA Times if right-wing Koch brothers buy paper « Hot Air

What do you mean only half will quitt??

I thought the whole paper was nothing but lefty loonies??

They are, but only half of them have a spine.

 

[healthmyths]

Call their bluff. Wherever you stand politically, we can all agree on that, right? If you’re a liberal, you want to see the fair, balanced, impartial LA Times newsroom rise as one and walk out in protest of having to work for libertarian oligarKKKs. If you’re a conservative, you want them gone for different reasons, partly as a smoking gun of bias and partly because it’ll clear the decks to hire more neutral reporters. And if they don’t walk out, that’s okay — their cheap bravado will have been exposed in all its cheapness.

Call their bluff. Break the left’s media monopoly. Then rename the paper the “Los Angeles Kochtopus,” just to spite them.

Report: Half of staff may quit LA Times if right-wing Koch brothers buy paper « Hot Air

What do you mean only half will quitt??

I thought the whole paper was nothing but lefty loonies??

They are, but only half of them have a spine.

So with the below, I strongly encourage them to leave! Would mean there would be more true professional OBJECTIVE journalists then what the below illustrate!

"Senior executives, on-air personalities, producers, reporters, editors, writers and other self-identifying employees of ABC, CBS and NBC contributed more than $1 million to Democratic candidates and campaign committees in 2008, according to an analysis by The Examiner of data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics.

The Democratic total of $1,020,816 was given by 1,160 employees of the three major broadcast television networks, with an average contribution of $880.

By contrast, only 193 of the employees contributed to Republican candidates and campaign committees, for a total of $142,863.

The average Republican contribution was $744.

Obama, Democrats got 88 percent of 2008 contributions by TV network execs, writers, reporters | The Daily Caller

Now If 1,160 (85%) of 1,353 employees of ABC,CBS & NBC gave $1.02 million (88%) to Democrats do you think these donors are stupid?
If you don't think they are stupid, then do you think they wanted the Democrats to win?

FACTS:
In 1964, 94% of media professionals voted for Democrat Lyndon Johnson over Republican Barry Goldwater.
In 1968, 86% voted for Democrat Hubert Humphrey over Republican Richard Nixon.
In 1972, 81% voted for Democrat George McGovern over the incumbent Nixon.
In 1976, 81% voted for Democrat Jimmy Carter over Republican Gerald Ford.
In 1980, twice as many cast their ballots for Carter rather than for Republican Ronald Reagan.
In 1984, 58% supported Democrat Walter Mondale, whom Reagan defeated in the biggest landslide in presidential election history.
In 1988, White House correspondents from various major newspapers, television networks, magazines, and news services supported Democrat Michael Dukakis over Republican George H.W. Bush by a ratio of 12-to-1.
In 1992, those same correspondents supported Democrat Bill Clinton over the incumbent Bush by a ratio of 9 to 2.
Among Washington bureau chiefs and congressional correspondents, the disparity was 89% vs. 7%, in Clinton’s favor.
In a 2004 poll of campaign journalists, those based outside of Washington, DC supported Democrat John Kerry over Republican George W. Bush by a ratio of 3-to-1. Those based inside the Beltway favored Kerry by a 12-to-1 ratio.
In a 2008 survey of 144 journalists nationwide, journalists were 8 times likelier to make campaign contributions to Democrats than to Republicans.
A 2008 Investors Business Daily study put the campaign donation ratio at 11.5-to-1, in favor of Democrats. In terms of total dollars given, the ratio was 15-to-1.

Research on Media Bias - Discover the Networks

So.. using that same ratios there should be 80% of the staff leave!!!