Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason that Republican regions use more foodstamps is that they have been hit the hardest economically. Thanks to progressive loons, their primary sources of income...from resource development, industry, etc., have dried up. Progressives pool all their resources in the areas where they live..the cities. And they take everything that everybody else has in order to feed that.
So when they are looking for money, they reach out and take it from those areas that don't support them.
They shut down logging, in order to protect the forests for their enjoyment. They shut down fishing, they shut down mining, they shut down drilling, they shut down building.
And all the working people (Republicans) starve or are forced onto the dole.
The OP is a real peice of shit work..
Seventy percent of counties with the fastest-growth in food-stamp aid during the last four years voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 2008, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data compiled by Bloomberg. They include Republican strongholds like King County, Texas, which in 2008 backed Republican John McCain by 92.6 percent, his largest share in the nation; and fast-growing Douglas County, Colorado.
remember blacks only make up 18% percent of the population so who do you think is on food stamps, actually it's mostly white single mothers in the south and midwest
remember blacks only make up 18% of the population latinos about 21% the exception is higher in the south and only 1.3% of them are on food stamps the sad truth is mostly young single white females with children primarily in the south and northeast are on food stamps.
remember blacks only make up 18% of the population latinos about 21% the exception is higher in the south and only 1.3% of them are on food stamps the sad truth is mostly young single white females with children primarily in the south and northeast are on food stamps.
Where's your proof that only 1.3% of blacks and Latinos are on food stamps...again?
The chances of receiving food
stamps differ by the race, ethnicity,
and nativity of the mother.
Race: About 1 in 3, or 1.9 million,
Black mothers of childbearing ages
were food stamp recipients, compared
with 1 in 9, or 3.2 million
White mothers. Despite these differences
in recipiency rates, Black food
stamp mothers did not have significantly
more children than their White
counterparts. (See table.)
Hispanic origin: One in four (or
1.1 million) Hispanic mothers aged
15 to 44 were getting food stamps.
By comparison, about 1 in 7 (or 4.2
million) non-Hispanic mothers were
food stamp recipients. Although both
Hispanic and non-Hispanic mothers
on food stamps were an average of
20 years old when they had their first
child, Hispanic women had about 0.5
more children, on average, than non-
Hispanic women. (See table.) About
3 in 10 Hispanic mothers on food
stamps were born outside the United
States.
remember blacks only make up 18% of the population latinos about 21% the exception is higher in the south and only 1.3% of them are on food stamps the sad truth is mostly young single white females with children primarily in the south and northeast are on food stamps.
Where's your proof that only 1.3% of blacks and Latinos are on food stamps...again?
http://www.census.gov/apsd/www/statbrief/sb95_22.pdfThe chances of receiving food
stamps differ by the race, ethnicity,
and nativity of the mother.
Race: About 1 in 3, or 1.9 million,
Black mothers of childbearing ages
were food stamp recipients, compared
with 1 in 9, or 3.2 million
White mothers. Despite these differences
in recipiency rates, Black food
stamp mothers did not have significantly
more children than their White
counterparts. (See table.)
Hispanic origin: One in four (or
1.1 million) Hispanic mothers aged
15 to 44 were getting food stamps.
By comparison, about 1 in 7 (or 4.2
million) non-Hispanic mothers were
food stamp recipients. Although both
Hispanic and non-Hispanic mothers
on food stamps were an average of
20 years old when they had their first
child, Hispanic women had about 0.5
more children, on average, than non-
Hispanic women. (See table.) About
3 in 10 Hispanic mothers on food
stamps were born outside the United
States.
Where's your proof that only 1.3% of blacks and Latinos are on food stamps...again?
http://www.census.gov/apsd/www/statbrief/sb95_22.pdfThe chances of receiving food
stamps differ by the race, ethnicity,
and nativity of the mother.
Race: About 1 in 3, or 1.9 million,
Black mothers of childbearing ages
were food stamp recipients, compared
with 1 in 9, or 3.2 million
White mothers. Despite these differences
in recipiency rates, Black food
stamp mothers did not have significantly
more children than their White
counterparts. (See table.)
Hispanic origin: One in four (or
1.1 million) Hispanic mothers aged
15 to 44 were getting food stamps.
By comparison, about 1 in 7 (or 4.2
million) non-Hispanic mothers were
food stamp recipients. Although both
Hispanic and non-Hispanic mothers
on food stamps were an average of
20 years old when they had their first
child, Hispanic women had about 0.5
more children, on average, than non-
Hispanic women. (See table.) About
3 in 10 Hispanic mothers on food
stamps were born outside the United
States.
LOL! Try again. But, next time, try coming up with more current statistics than 1993. Further, who is exclusively talking about mothers receiving food stamps? You implying that there can't possibly be single fathers who have custody of their children, who are receiving food stamps? Or, for that matter, people who aren't even parents receiving food stamps? You DO know there are people who receive food stamps who don't have children...don't you?
By Frank Bass
Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney said in May that hed written off votes from 47 percent of Americans who are collecting government aid. Turns out many of them are part of his political base.
Seventy percent of counties with the fastest-growth in food-stamp aid during the last four years voted for the Republican presidential candidate in 2008, according to U.S. Department of Agriculture data compiled by Bloomberg.
More: Republican-Heavy Counties Eat Up Most Food-Stamp Growth - Bloomberg
LOL! Try again. But, next time, try coming up with more current statistics than 1993. Further, who is exclusively talking about mothers receiving food stamps? You implying that there can't possibly be single fathers who have custody of their children, who are receiving food stamps? Or, for that matter, people who aren't even parents receiving food stamps? You DO know there are people who receive food stamps who don't have children...don't you?
Why do I need more current stats?
If anything happened in the past 20 years to change the Census report, why don't you post it you lazy fuck?
The reason that Republican regions use more foodstamps is that they have been hit the hardest economically. Thanks to progressive loons, their primary sources of income...from resource development, industry, etc., have dried up. Progressives pool all their resources in the areas where they live..the cities. And they take everything that everybody else has in order to feed that.
So when they are looking for money, they reach out and take it from those areas that don't support them.
hey shut down logging, in order to protect the forests for their enjoyment. They shut down fishing, they shut down mining, they shut down drilling, they shut down building.
And all the working people (Republicans) starve or are forced onto the dole.
LOL! Try again. But, next time, try coming up with more current statistics than 1993. Further, who is exclusively talking about mothers receiving food stamps? You implying that there can't possibly be single fathers who have custody of their children, who are receiving food stamps? Or, for that matter, people who aren't even parents receiving food stamps? You DO know there are people who receive food stamps who don't have children...don't you?
Why do I need more current stats?
If anything happened in the past 20 years to change the Census report, why don't you post it you lazy fuck?
If the poster of whom I was responding to had stats to prove his/her point, why didn't THEY post it...chump? And, why are you not attacking them? Further, you damn rights there's something that has happened in the past 20 years to change the Census report. There's been an approximate 20 million increase in the number of recipients receiving food stamps, ya' STUPID fuck! Further still, there's been an increase of about 53,845,814 in the population of the United States...ya' STUPID fuck. There's all kinds of changes from the 1993 Census.
But, if we can conveniently pick and choose what coincides with our claims? Here, let's try a 2001 report...shall we? It's a little more current than the 1993 statistics
Rural and Urban Food Stamp Beneficiaries: Race, Ethnicity, and Family Structure
Rural and urban food stamp recipients share several characteristics. They are both more likely than the rest of the population to be children and living in single-parent households. Both rural and urban adults who benefit from the program are more likely than others to be disabled and less educated.
Yet, significant differences between rural and urban program beneficiaries exist, differences that tend to reflect overall differences between the nation's rural and urban populations. Rural residents who receive food stamps are more likely than their urban counterparts to be White, non-Hispanics. Fifty three percent of rural food stamp recipients are White, compared with 34 percent of urban recipients. African-American and Hispanics make up 40 percent of recipients in rural areas, but 62 percent in urban areas.
So, if we average the fifty three percent of White food stamp recipients living in rural areas with the thirty four percent of White food stamp recipients living in urban areas, we get 44%
If we average the forty percent of black and Hispanic food stamp recipients living in rural areas with the sixty two percent of black and Hispanic food stamp recipients living in urban areas, we get 51%.
So, in 2001, 44% of whites living in rural and urban areas received food stamps.
In 2001, 51% of blacks and Hispanics living in rural and urban areas received food stamps.
Any questions?
http://www.aecf.org/~/media/PublicationFiles/CarseyBrief1RuralFoodStamps.pdf
Why do I need more current stats?
If anything happened in the past 20 years to change the Census report, why don't you post it you lazy fuck?
If the poster of whom I was responding to had stats to prove his/her point, why didn't THEY post it...chump? And, why are you not attacking them? Further, you damn rights there's something that has happened in the past 20 years to change the Census report. There's been an approximate 20 million increase in the number of recipients receiving food stamps, ya' STUPID fuck! Further still, there's been an increase of about 53,845,814 in the population of the United States...ya' STUPID fuck. There's all kinds of changes from the 1993 Census.
But, if we can conveniently pick and choose what coincides with our claims? Here, let's try a 2001 report...shall we? It's a little more current than the 1993 statistics
Rural and Urban Food Stamp Beneficiaries: Race, Ethnicity, and Family Structure
Rural and urban food stamp recipients share several characteristics. They are both more likely than the rest of the population to be children and living in single-parent households. Both rural and urban adults who benefit from the program are more likely than others to be disabled and less educated.
Yet, significant differences between rural and urban program beneficiaries exist, differences that tend to reflect overall differences between the nation's rural and urban populations. Rural residents who receive food stamps are more likely than their urban counterparts to be White, non-Hispanics. Fifty three percent of rural food stamp recipients are White, compared with 34 percent of urban recipients. African-American and Hispanics make up 40 percent of recipients in rural areas, but 62 percent in urban areas.
So, if we average the fifty three percent of White food stamp recipients living in rural areas with the thirty four percent of White food stamp recipients living in urban areas, we get 44%
If we average the forty percent of black and Hispanic food stamp recipients living in rural areas with the sixty two percent of black and Hispanic food stamp recipients living in urban areas, we get 51%.
So, in 2001, 44% of whites living in rural and urban areas received food stamps.
In 2001, 51% of blacks and Hispanics living in rural and urban areas received food stamps.
Any questions?
http://www.aecf.org/~/media/PublicationFiles/CarseyBrief1RuralFoodStamps.pdf
2001?
That was...
12 years ago
My stats agree with yours? Really, where do you figure that...milquetoast? Elaborate. Your stats seemed to imply that as a proportion to population more whites receive food stamps than blacks and Hispanics. My stats prove this premise wrong. And again...true, these stats were for 2001 but, I think anyone with one ounce of intellectual capacity can figure out these stats, at best, haven't changed and, in fact, could surmise the gap has gotten wider with blacks and Hispanics receiving significantly larger portions of food stamps than whites when taking into consideration the population differences between whites, blacks and Hispanics.and you're point was, what, moron? That your stats agreed with mine?
You shouldn't be so hard on yourself.pathetic.
Not hardly. But, it's obvious you need a lower dose as you're clearly higher than a loon.Check your 'script, geezer....looks like you need a higher dose.
