Republican House Increased Debt $7.9 Trillion in 8 Years

[g5000]

America's Motto: Gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it.

 

[shockedcanadian]

America's Motto: Gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it.

Sadly, it's becoming like this everywhere.

In Canada, it's "gimme gimme gimme gimme, and if you don't give, we will just take it and screw your life over".

In America you say "God Bless America" and "In God we trust". In Canada the governments says, "we are your God".

 

[BlackFlag]

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

I know enough. Even better, I know what awaits you if socialism takes hold.

100 years from now when some nerd scrubs the internet and they see my posts, they will say "this shockcanadian warned us a century ago"

^ totally ignorant Canadian thinks 1 out of 435 reps in the House of Representatives is enough to pass a massive heathcare bill

Obviously not, but she is gaining alot of traction and airtime. There are many on their side who want Open Borders, Universal Healthcare and want to tax your cars and destroy your jobs. In fact, one proposal, again put forward by Cortez, is said to phase out all gas cars in a certain number of years, and fossil fuel jobs. Said to cost 5.8M jobs.

This stuff was tried in Ontario, take a look at our fiscal situation, poor economy and failed, massive green industry boondoggles paid for by taxpayers. We have dormant windmills and all these failed Green energy companies who went belly up, all paid for by the taxpayer.

All my President does is talk about how you Canadians bully us and rip us off, massively benefitting off our weakness. So if your country sucks, we must be pathetically bad. Maybe Cortez is the answer.

 

[Brain357]

America's Motto: Gimme gimme gimme, and make that guy over there pay for it.

Let the next generation pay for it...

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Hold onto your seat (and your wallet). OAC is proposing Universal Healthcare at a cost of $32 Trillion.

Which has no realistic chance of becoming reality anytime in the near future

 

[Pete7469]

That's why I call 'em RepubliCRATS

 

[MarcATL]

Party of fiscal responsibility, right?

The recently deposed Republican majority increased the federal debt by $7.9 trillion in the eight years it controlled the House of Representatives.

At the close of business on Jan. 4, 2011, the day before the Republicans took control of the House, the debt was $14,014,049,043,294.41, according to the Treasury.

On Jan. 3, 2019, the last day before the Republicans turned control of the House back to the Democrats, the debt closed at $21,929,258,046,653.58.

So, under the Republican House majorities in four Congresses, the debt climbed $7,915,209,003,359.17.

Republican House Increased Debt $7.9 Trillion in 8 Years

Well, well, well....honesty, for a change.

 

[MarcATL]

I know enough. Even better, I know what awaits you if socialism takes hold.

100 years from now when some nerd scrubs the internet and they see my posts, they will say "this shockcanadian warned us a century ago"

More like, "What an ignorant fool that poster by the name of shockedcanadian was."

#TooFunny #CLASSIC

 

[progressive hunter]

wel

Hold onto your seat. OAC is proposing Universal Healthcare at a cost of $32 Trillion.

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

I know enough. Even better, I know what awaits you if socialism takes hold.

100 years from now when some nerd scrubs the internet and they see my posts, they will say "this shockcanadian warned us a century ago"

^ totally ignorant Canadian thinks 1 out of 435 reps in the House of Representatives is enough to pass a massive heathcare bill

well she has the support of trump since his stated goal of healthcare is a universal system

 

[MarcATL]

Why am I NOT surprised that little to no USMB's self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other rightwingers participated in this thread.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

 

[Globalist]

Why am I NOT surprised that little to know USMB's self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other rightwingers participated in this thread.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

Funny how the tea party and other clowns screamed about "fiscal responsibility" and "balancing the budget" when Obama was in office during a terrible economic downturn. Now they are silent.

 

[progressive hunter]

Why am I NOT surprised that little to know USMB's self-professed conservatives, Republicans and other rightwingers participated in this thread.

#LOLGOP #TooFunny #CLASSIC

Funny how the tea party and other clowns screamed about "fiscal responsibility" and "balancing the budget" when Obama was in office during a terrible economic downturn. Now they are silent.

it was republicans not TPer's that did this,,,we stood opposed to the spending

 

[sartre play]

Lets blame every thing on a new little power member of the house & let Mitch continue to be the major contributor to the collapse of everything that America was built on.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Yep, and they're spineless cowards.

 

[depotoo]

Yep, when Obamacare came about and they decided to push take an aspirin rather than treatment.

Party of fiscal responsibility, right?

The recently deposed Republican majority increased the federal debt by $7.9 trillion in the eight years it controlled the House of Representatives.

At the close of business on Jan. 4, 2011, the day before the Republicans took control of the House, the debt was $14,014,049,043,294.41, according to the Treasury.

On Jan. 3, 2019, the last day before the Republicans turned control of the House back to the Democrats, the debt closed at $21,929,258,046,653.58.

So, under the Republican House majorities in four Congresses, the debt climbed $7,915,209,003,359.17.

Republican House Increased Debt $7.9 Trillion in 8 Years

Hold onto your seat. OAC is proposing Universal Healthcare at a cost of $32 Trillion.

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

There are none who so deeply do not know shit about this country than it's own peoples. By design.

New York, N.Y., October 8, 2015 — The U.S. spent more per person on health care than 12 other high-income nations in 2013, while seeing the lowest life expectancy and some of the worst health outcomes among this group, according to a Commonwealth Fund report out today. The analysis shows that in the U.S., which spent an average of $9,086 per person annually, life expectancy was 78.8 years. Switzerland, the second-highest-spending country, spent $6,325 per person and had a life expectancy of 82.9 years. Mortality rates for cancer were among the lowest in the U.S., but rates of chronic conditions, obesity, and infant mortality were higher than those abroad.

“Time and again, we see evidence that the amount of money we spend on health care in this country is not gaining us comparable health benefits,” said Commonwealth Fund President David Blumenthal, M.D. “We have to look at the root causes of this disconnect and invest our health care dollars in ways that will allow us to live longer while enjoying better health and greater productivity.”

U.S. Spends More on Health Care Than Other High-Income Nations But Has Lower Life Expectancy, Worse Health | Commonwealth Fund


U.S. Healthcare Ranked Dead Last Compared To 10 Other Countries

U.S. Healthcare Ranked Dead Last Compared To 10 Other Countries


Major Findings
· Quality: The indicators of quality were grouped into four categories: effective care, safe care, coordinated care, and patient-centered care. Compared with the other 10 countries, the U.S. fares best on provision and receipt of preventive and patient-centered care. While there has been some improvement in recent years, lower scores on safe and coordinated care pull the overall U.S. quality score down. Continued adoption of health information technology should enhance the ability of U.S. physicians to identify, monitor, and coordinate care for their patients, particularly those with chronic conditions.

· Access: Not surprisingly—given the absence of universal coverage—people in the U.S. go without needed health care because of cost more often than people do in the other countries. Americans were the most likely to say they had access problems related to cost. Patients in the U.S. have rapid access to specialized health care services; however, they are less likely to report rapid access to primary care than people in leading countries in the study. In other countries, like Canada, patients have little to no financial burden, but experience wait times for such specialized services. There is a frequent misperception that trade-offs between universal coverage and timely access to specialized services are inevitable; however, the Netherlands, U.K., and Germany provide universal coverage with low out-of-pocket costs while maintaining quick access to specialty services.

· Efficiency: On indicators of efficiency, the U.S. ranks last among the 11 countries, with the U.K. and Sweden ranking first and second, respectively. The U.S. has poor performance on measures of national health expenditures and administrative costs as well as on measures of administrative hassles, avoidable emergency room use, and duplicative medical testing. Sicker survey respondents in the U.K. and France are less likely to visit the emergency room for a condition that could have been treated by a regular doctor, had one been available.

· Equity: The U.S. ranks a clear last on measures of equity. Americans with below-average incomes were much more likely than their counterparts in other countries to report not visiting a physician when sick; not getting a recommended test, treatment, or follow-up care; or not filling a prescription or skipping doses when needed because of costs. On each of these indicators, one-third or more lower-income adults in the U.S. said they went without needed care because of costs in the past year.

· Healthy lives: The U.S. ranks last overall with poor scores on all three indicators of healthy lives—mortality amenable to medical care, infant mortality, and healthy life expectancy at age 60. The U.S. and U.K. had much higher death rates in 2007 from conditions amenable to medical care than some of the other countries, e.g., rates 25 percent to 50 percent higher than Australia and Sweden. Overall, France, Sweden, and Switzerland rank highest on healthy lives.

How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally


No other advanced country even comes close to the United States in annual spending on health care, but plenty of those other countries see much better outcomes in their citizens' actual health overall.

A new Commonwealth Fund report released Thursday underscored that point — yet again — with an analysis that ranks 13 high-income nations on their overall health spending, use of medical services, prices and health outcomes.

The study data, which is from 2013, predates the full implementation of Obamacare, which took place in 2014. Obamacare is designed to increase health coverage for Americans and stem the rise in health-care costs.

The findings indicate that despite spending well in excess of the rate of any other of those countries in 2013, the United States achieved worse outcomes when it comes to rates of chronic conditions, obesity and infant mortality.

One rare bright spot for the U.S., however, is that its mortality rate for cancer is among the lowest out of the 13 countries, and that cancer rates fell faster between 1995 and 2007 than in other countries.

"Time and again, we see evidence that the amount of money we spend on health care in this country is not gaining us comparable health benefits," said Dr. David Blumenthal, president of the Commonwealth Fund. "We have to look at the root causes of this disconnect and invest our health-care dollars in ways that will allow us to live longer while enjoying better health and greater productivity."

US health care: Spending a lot, getting the least


Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System
NEJM - Error


Health Care Outcomes in States Influenced by Coverage, Disparities
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...-in-states-influenced-by-coverage-disparities


One explanation for the health disadvantage of the United States relative to other high-income countries might be deficiencies in health services. Although the United States is renowned for its leadership in biomedical research, its cutting-edge medical technology, and its hospitals and specialists, problems with ensuring Americans’ access to the system and providing quality care have been a long-standing concern of policy makers and the public (Berwick et al., 2008; Brook, 2011b; Fineberg, 2012). Higher mortality rates from diseases, and even from transportation-related injuries and homicides, may be traceable in part to failings in the health care system.

The United States stands out from many other countries in not offering universal health insurance coverage. In 2010, 50 million people (16 percent of the U.S. population) were uninsured (DeNavas-Walt et al., 2011). Access to health care services, particularly in rural and frontier communities or disadvantaged urban centers, is often limited. The United States has a relatively weak foundation for primary care and a shortage of family physicians (American Academy of Family Physicians, 2009; Grumbach et al., 2009; Macinko et al., 2007; Sandy et al., 2009). Many Americans rely on emergency departments for acute, chronic, and even preventive care (Institute of Medicine, 2007a; Schoen et al., 2009b, 2011). Cost sharing is common in the United States, and high out-of-pocket expenses make health care services, pharmaceuticals, and medical supplies increasingly unaffordable (Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance System, 2011; Karaca-Mandic et al., 2012). In 2011, one-third of American households reported problems paying medical bills (Cohen et al., 2012), a problem that seems to have worsened in recent years (Himmelstein et al., 2009). Health insurance premiums are consuming an increasing proportion of U.S. household income (Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance System, 2011).

Public Health and Medical Care Systems - U.S. Health in International Perspective - NCBI Bookshelf


Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey

A report released Monday by a respected think tank ranks the United States dead last in the quality of its health-care system when compared with 10 other western, industrialized nations, the same spot it occupied in four previous studies by the same organization. Not only did the U.S. fail to move up between 2004 and 2014 -- as other nations did with concerted effort and significant reforms -- it also has maintained this dubious distinction while spending far more per capita ($8,508) on health care than Norway ($5,669), which has the second most expensive system.

"Although the U.S. spends more on health care than any other country and has the highest proportion of specialist physicians, survey findings indicate that from the patients’ perspective, and based on outcome indicators, the performance of American health care is severely lacking," the Commonwealth Fund, a New York-based foundation that promotes improved health care, concluded in its extensive analysis. The charts in this post are from the report.


Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey


US healthcare system ranks 50th out of 55 countries for efficiency
US healthcare system ranks 50th out of 55 countries for efficiency


The U.S. healthcare system notched another dubious honor in a new comparison of its quality to the systems of 10 other developed countries: its rank was dead last.

The new study by the Commonwealth Fund ranks the U.S. against seven wealthy European countries and Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It's a follow-up of previous surveys published in 2010, 2007, 2006 and 2004, in all of which the U.S. also ranked last.

Although the U.S. ranked in the middle of the pack on measures of effectiveness, safety and coordination of care, it ranked dead last on access and cost, by a sufficient margin to rank dead last overall. The breakdowns are in the chart above.

Conservative pundits hastened to explain away these results after the report was published. See Aaron Carroll for a gloss on the "zombie arguments" put forth against the clear evidence that the U.S. system falls short.

The U.S. healthcare system: worst in the developed world

U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World
U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World

 

[H B Lowrie]

Party of fiscal responsibility, right?

The recently deposed Republican majority increased the federal debt by $7.9 trillion in the eight years it controlled the House of Representatives.

At the close of business on Jan. 4, 2011, the day before the Republicans took control of the House, the debt was $14,014,049,043,294.41, according to the Treasury.

On Jan. 3, 2019, the last day before the Republicans turned control of the House back to the Democrats, the debt closed at $21,929,258,046,653.58.

So, under the Republican House majorities in four Congresses, the debt climbed $7,915,209,003,359.17.

Republican House Increased Debt $7.9 Trillion in 8 Years

Hold onto your seat. OAC is proposing Universal Healthcare at a cost of $32 Trillion.

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

heres a novel concept -

worry about Canada and leave America to AMERICANS.

AKA , STFU

If only americans would do themselves - and had the integrity required for such - what they demand of others.

You have 8 endless, hot, generational, shooting wars up and running as we type, a military budget so expansive it economically cannibalizes your own society, and how many military bases/installations/occupations in how many nations across the globe?

Maybe WE should do what we tell others to someday.

 

[H B Lowrie]

Hold onto your seat. OAC is proposing Universal Healthcare at a cost of $32 Trillion.

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

There are none who so deeply do not know shit about this country than it's own peoples. By design.

New York, N.Y., October 8, 2015 — The U.S. spent more per person on health care than 12 other high-income nations in 2013, while seeing the lowest life expectancy and some of the worst health outcomes among this group, according to a Commonwealth Fund report out today. The analysis shows that in the U.S., which spent an average of $9,086 per person annually, life expectancy was 78.8 years. Switzerland, the second-highest-spending country, spent $6,325 per person and had a life expectancy of 82.9 years. Mortality rates for cancer were among the lowest in the U.S., but rates of chronic conditions, obesity, and infant mortality were higher than those abroad.

“Time and again, we see evidence that the amount of money we spend on health care in this country is not gaining us comparable health benefits,” said Commonwealth Fund President David Blumenthal, M.D. “We have to look at the root causes of this disconnect and invest our health care dollars in ways that will allow us to live longer while enjoying better health and greater productivity.”

U.S. Spends More on Health Care Than Other High-Income Nations But Has Lower Life Expectancy, Worse Health | Commonwealth Fund


U.S. Healthcare Ranked Dead Last Compared To 10 Other Countries

U.S. Healthcare Ranked Dead Last Compared To 10 Other Countries


Major Findings
· Quality: The indicators of quality were grouped into four categories: effective care, safe care, coordinated care, and patient-centered care. Compared with the other 10 countries, the U.S. fares best on provision and receipt of preventive and patient-centered care. While there has been some improvement in recent years, lower scores on safe and coordinated care pull the overall U.S. quality score down. Continued adoption of health information technology should enhance the ability of U.S. physicians to identify, monitor, and coordinate care for their patients, particularly those with chronic conditions.

· Access: Not surprisingly—given the absence of universal coverage—people in the U.S. go without needed health care because of cost more often than people do in the other countries. Americans were the most likely to say they had access problems related to cost. Patients in the U.S. have rapid access to specialized health care services; however, they are less likely to report rapid access to primary care than people in leading countries in the study. In other countries, like Canada, patients have little to no financial burden, but experience wait times for such specialized services. There is a frequent misperception that trade-offs between universal coverage and timely access to specialized services are inevitable; however, the Netherlands, U.K., and Germany provide universal coverage with low out-of-pocket costs while maintaining quick access to specialty services.

· Efficiency: On indicators of efficiency, the U.S. ranks last among the 11 countries, with the U.K. and Sweden ranking first and second, respectively. The U.S. has poor performance on measures of national health expenditures and administrative costs as well as on measures of administrative hassles, avoidable emergency room use, and duplicative medical testing. Sicker survey respondents in the U.K. and France are less likely to visit the emergency room for a condition that could have been treated by a regular doctor, had one been available.

· Equity: The U.S. ranks a clear last on measures of equity. Americans with below-average incomes were much more likely than their counterparts in other countries to report not visiting a physician when sick; not getting a recommended test, treatment, or follow-up care; or not filling a prescription or skipping doses when needed because of costs. On each of these indicators, one-third or more lower-income adults in the U.S. said they went without needed care because of costs in the past year.

· Healthy lives: The U.S. ranks last overall with poor scores on all three indicators of healthy lives—mortality amenable to medical care, infant mortality, and healthy life expectancy at age 60. The U.S. and U.K. had much higher death rates in 2007 from conditions amenable to medical care than some of the other countries, e.g., rates 25 percent to 50 percent higher than Australia and Sweden. Overall, France, Sweden, and Switzerland rank highest on healthy lives.

How the U.S. Health Care System Compares Internationally


No other advanced country even comes close to the United States in annual spending on health care, but plenty of those other countries see much better outcomes in their citizens' actual health overall.

A new Commonwealth Fund report released Thursday underscored that point — yet again — with an analysis that ranks 13 high-income nations on their overall health spending, use of medical services, prices and health outcomes.

The study data, which is from 2013, predates the full implementation of Obamacare, which took place in 2014. Obamacare is designed to increase health coverage for Americans and stem the rise in health-care costs.

The findings indicate that despite spending well in excess of the rate of any other of those countries in 2013, the United States achieved worse outcomes when it comes to rates of chronic conditions, obesity and infant mortality.

One rare bright spot for the U.S., however, is that its mortality rate for cancer is among the lowest out of the 13 countries, and that cancer rates fell faster between 1995 and 2007 than in other countries.

"Time and again, we see evidence that the amount of money we spend on health care in this country is not gaining us comparable health benefits," said Dr. David Blumenthal, president of the Commonwealth Fund. "We have to look at the root causes of this disconnect and invest our health-care dollars in ways that will allow us to live longer while enjoying better health and greater productivity."

US health care: Spending a lot, getting the least


Ranking 37th — Measuring the Performance of the U.S. Health Care System
NEJM - Error


Health Care Outcomes in States Influenced by Coverage, Disparities
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...-in-states-influenced-by-coverage-disparities


One explanation for the health disadvantage of the United States relative to other high-income countries might be deficiencies in health services. Although the United States is renowned for its leadership in biomedical research, its cutting-edge medical technology, and its hospitals and specialists, problems with ensuring Americans’ access to the system and providing quality care have been a long-standing concern of policy makers and the public (Berwick et al., 2008; Brook, 2011b; Fineberg, 2012). Higher mortality rates from diseases, and even from transportation-related injuries and homicides, may be traceable in part to failings in the health care system.

The United States stands out from many other countries in not offering universal health insurance coverage. In 2010, 50 million people (16 percent of the U.S. population) were uninsured (DeNavas-Walt et al., 2011). Access to health care services, particularly in rural and frontier communities or disadvantaged urban centers, is often limited. The United States has a relatively weak foundation for primary care and a shortage of family physicians (American Academy of Family Physicians, 2009; Grumbach et al., 2009; Macinko et al., 2007; Sandy et al., 2009). Many Americans rely on emergency departments for acute, chronic, and even preventive care (Institute of Medicine, 2007a; Schoen et al., 2009b, 2011). Cost sharing is common in the United States, and high out-of-pocket expenses make health care services, pharmaceuticals, and medical supplies increasingly unaffordable (Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance System, 2011; Karaca-Mandic et al., 2012). In 2011, one-third of American households reported problems paying medical bills (Cohen et al., 2012), a problem that seems to have worsened in recent years (Himmelstein et al., 2009). Health insurance premiums are consuming an increasing proportion of U.S. household income (Commonwealth Fund Commission on a High Performance System, 2011).

Public Health and Medical Care Systems - U.S. Health in International Perspective - NCBI Bookshelf


Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey

A report released Monday by a respected think tank ranks the United States dead last in the quality of its health-care system when compared with 10 other western, industrialized nations, the same spot it occupied in four previous studies by the same organization. Not only did the U.S. fail to move up between 2004 and 2014 -- as other nations did with concerted effort and significant reforms -- it also has maintained this dubious distinction while spending far more per capita ($8,508) on health care than Norway ($5,669), which has the second most expensive system.

"Although the U.S. spends more on health care than any other country and has the highest proportion of specialist physicians, survey findings indicate that from the patients’ perspective, and based on outcome indicators, the performance of American health care is severely lacking," the Commonwealth Fund, a New York-based foundation that promotes improved health care, concluded in its extensive analysis. The charts in this post are from the report.


Once again, U.S. has most expensive, least effective health care system in survey


US healthcare system ranks 50th out of 55 countries for efficiency
US healthcare system ranks 50th out of 55 countries for efficiency


The U.S. healthcare system notched another dubious honor in a new comparison of its quality to the systems of 10 other developed countries: its rank was dead last.

The new study by the Commonwealth Fund ranks the U.S. against seven wealthy European countries and Canada, Australia and New Zealand. It's a follow-up of previous surveys published in 2010, 2007, 2006 and 2004, in all of which the U.S. also ranked last.

Although the U.S. ranked in the middle of the pack on measures of effectiveness, safety and coordination of care, it ranked dead last on access and cost, by a sufficient margin to rank dead last overall. The breakdowns are in the chart above.

Conservative pundits hastened to explain away these results after the report was published. See Aaron Carroll for a gloss on the "zombie arguments" put forth against the clear evidence that the U.S. system falls short.

The U.S. healthcare system: worst in the developed world

U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World
U.S. Health Care Ranked Worst in the Developed World

[/QUOTE]

Yep, when Obamacare came about and they decided to push take an aspirin rather than treatment.

Yes, our shitty healthcare is utterly bipartisan. That how it works here. Your political parties work in tandem to thwart the will of the people for the moneyed class.

 

[H B Lowrie]

Do you know the difference between proposing and actually doing?

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

I know enough. Even better, I know what awaits you if socialism takes hold.

100 years from now when some nerd scrubs the internet and they see my posts, they will say "this shockcanadian warned us a century ago"

^ totally ignorant Canadian thinks 1 out of 435 reps in the House of Representatives is enough to pass a massive heathcare bill

Obviously not, but she is gaining alot of traction and airtime. There are many on their side who want Open Borders, Universal Healthcare and want to tax your cars and destroy your jobs. In fact, one proposal, again put forward by Cortez, is said to phase out all gas cars in a certain number of years, and fossil fuel jobs. Said to cost 5.8M jobs.

This stuff was tried in Ontario, take a look at our fiscal situation, poor economy and failed, massive green industry boondoggles paid for by taxpayers. We have dormant windmills and all these failed Green energy companies who went belly up, all paid for by the taxpayer.

We already bailed out our "capitalist" economic system with socialism And we well again, watch.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

No, I only know socialism. The slogan in America should be "Just Don't Do It!"

Then perhaps you should keep our nose out of our business and worry about your own darn country. You do not know shit about this one

I know enough. Even better, I know what awaits you if socialism takes hold.

100 years from now when some nerd scrubs the internet and they see my posts, they will say "this shockcanadian warned us a century ago"

^ totally ignorant Canadian thinks 1 out of 435 reps in the House of Representatives is enough to pass a massive heathcare bill

Obviously not, but she is gaining alot of traction and airtime. There are many on their side who want Open Borders, Universal Healthcare and want to tax your cars and destroy your jobs. In fact, one proposal, again put forward by Cortez, is said to phase out all gas cars in a certain number of years, and fossil fuel jobs. Said to cost 5.8M jobs.

This stuff was tried in Ontario, take a look at our fiscal situation, poor economy and failed, massive green industry boondoggles paid for by taxpayers. We have dormant windmills and all these failed Green energy companies who went belly up, all paid for by the taxpayer.

We already bailed out our "capitalist" economic system with socialism And we well again, watch.

The next crash will be a monetary reset to a global blockchain currency.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Republicans like to spend just as much as their partners in crime.
Both major parties do

Neato! But the deficit is not just about spending. It's about paying for it.