Republican Senators send a letter to Iran. Wow. Damn!

Yes but... he didn't say, "Major combat operations in Iraq are over" (Bush's
Mission Accomplished Speech on May 1, 2003).
...which proves that you are still clueless after many years.
LOL as usual, nothing of substance and the usual ad hominem.
You proved that you were clueless, all I did was point it out.
No you did not. To do so you would have needed to explain why I was wrong, something you are incapable of doing. Why not find another hobby, one in which you might have some competence? You do a good job of parroting right wing propaganda, but therein is the full measure of your ability (so to speak).
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.
 
Wow, It's time you read a little history.

Actually idiot, I know it better than anyone on this forum. The US gave iranians some money to overthrow a PM who had tried to take the powers of the shah, according to the iranian constitution. Mossadegh was never elected, he was appointed by the shah to his position. Go read the de-classified CIA papers - all of them. I have, did you? The US did not overthrow any government, it is a KGB lie, and low information obama voters like you love to lap it up.



Speaking of IDIOTS, you are relying on a CIA account....the same CIA that DID overthrow Mossadegh because the guy wanted a larger portion of the oil revenue to remain in Iranian hands....British Petrolium and other big oil companies dictated to the CIA to get rid of the upstart so that they could continue to rip off the Iranians......

But, what really pissed off Iran, was the brutal secret service under the Shah (while he was whoring all over Europe) who tortured and killed ANY dissenter.

ROFLMNAO! So you're saying that BP was running the CIA?

Well, sure... I mean that makes perfect sense, 'big corporation, therefore JEWS!'

Oh you're all over this one... .
 
Wow, It's time you read a little history.

Actually idiot, I know it better than anyone on this forum. The US gave iranians some money to overthrow a PM who had tried to take the powers of the shah, according to the iranian constitution. Mossadegh was never elected, he was appointed by the shah to his position. Go read the de-classified CIA papers - all of them. I have, did you? The US did not overthrow any government, it is a KGB lie, and low information obama voters like you love to lap it up.

"Mohammad Reza Pahlavi came to power during World War II after an Anglo-Soviet invasion forced the abdication of his father Reza Shah. During Mohammad Reza's reign, the Iranian oil industry was briefly nationalized under the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh before a U.S. and UK-backed coup d'état deposed Mosaddegh and brought back foreign oil firms"
 
...which proves that you are still clueless after many years.
LOL as usual, nothing of substance and the usual ad hominem.
You proved that you were clueless, all I did was point it out.
No you did not. To do so you would have needed to explain why I was wrong, something you are incapable of doing. Why not find another hobby, one in which you might have some competence? You do a good job of parroting right wing propaganda, but therein is the full measure of your ability (so to speak).
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.

The Mission was Accomplished... and Combat operations were over. THEN the Ideological Left kicked in, ignited a media frenzy over a naked Islamic pyramid and the insuregency of Al Qaeda in Iraq began.

Which required that anti-insurgency tactics be instituted; which are wholly distinct from 'Combat Operations' relative to the invasion of Iraq and the first to dismantle the Iraqi Islamic-Socialist government.

But, in fairness to you, as a relativist, there is no way you could have known that.
 
Obama did what the American people wanted him to do- get our boys out of Iraq.

Then in turn launched the bombing of Libya, invaded Pakistan to kill OBL, launched drone strikes in Yemen, sent troops back to Iraq to combat ISIS, and sent some of our personnel to Sudan and Uganda.

Apparently he's just as bad as his predecessor.

Erm, so you think he should have let Osama Bin Laden live - like Bush did?

He wouldn't have done it had there not been an election to win.


He was killed on 02 May 2011.
There was no election going on at that time.

Your ignorance is fun to watch, potato-chipper.
 
LOL as usual, nothing of substance and the usual ad hominem.
You proved that you were clueless, all I did was point it out.
No you did not. To do so you would have needed to explain why I was wrong, something you are incapable of doing. Why not find another hobby, one in which you might have some competence? You do a good job of parroting right wing propaganda, but therein is the full measure of your ability (so to speak).
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.

The Mission was Accomplished... and Combat operations were over. THEN the Ideological Left kicked in, ignited a media frenzy over a naked Islamic pyramid and the insuregency of Al Qaeda in Iraq began.

Which required that anti-insurgency tactics be instituted; which are wholly distinct from 'Combat Operations' relative to the invasion of Iraq and the first to dismantle the Iraqi Islamic-Socialist government.

But, in fairness to you, as a relativist, there is no way you could have known that.

Another spin that won't turn. As a realist I can walk in any US Cemetery and read the names of those who fell after Major Combat Operations succeeded. Bush's Crusade was an abject failure, measured by its cost in blood and treasure, and the current state of world affairs. Point fingers all you please, the rewrite of history is all you and your kind have; don't expect anyone to buy your bull shit.
 
Let's turn off the kgb/iran talking points, the US did not "overthrow" anyone or anything, so lets keep the nonsense out of the thread.

Oil nationalization and the 1953 coup

https://en.wikipedia.org

Under the direction of Kermit Roosevelt, Jr., a senior Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer and grandson of former U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt, the American CIA and British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS) funded and led a covert operation to depose Mossaddegh with the help of military forces disloyal to the democratically elected government..
 
[...] Why are leftists so totally non credible, whining about what the US allegedly did in 1953, but silent on iran doing 1000 times worse in iraq in 2003 forward?
I bet some people warned of the consequences of deposing Saddam. What did they know, eh?
 
You proved that you were clueless, all I did was point it out.
No you did not. To do so you would have needed to explain why I was wrong, something you are incapable of doing. Why not find another hobby, one in which you might have some competence? You do a good job of parroting right wing propaganda, but therein is the full measure of your ability (so to speak).
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.

The Mission was Accomplished... and Combat operations were over. THEN the Ideological Left kicked in, ignited a media frenzy over a naked Islamic pyramid and the insuregency of Al Qaeda in Iraq began.

Which required that anti-insurgency tactics be instituted; which are wholly distinct from 'Combat Operations' relative to the invasion of Iraq and the first to dismantle the Iraqi Islamic-Socialist government.

But, in fairness to you, as a relativist, there is no way you could have known that.

Another spin that won't turn. As a realist I can walk in any US Cemetery and read the names of those who fell after Major Combat Operations 'succeeded'. Bush's Crusade was an abject failure, measured by its cost in blood and treasure, and the current state of world affairs. Point fingers all you please, the rewrite of history is all you and you kind have, but don't expect anyone to buy your bull shit.

(The Reader should note that the use of 'spin' is a substitution for 'truth', which as you know, is a concept with which the lowly Relativists are not familiar. So they use phrasing which better fits within the Relativist bent, wherein 'truth' is whatever the individual 'feels' it is... 'relative' or 'subject' to their own personal needs, wants and desires... .

Suffice it to say that casualties incurred in the wake of major combat operations closing, in no way determines that major combat, relevant to the invasion of Iraq and the removal of the Iraqi-Islamic/Socialist Government, had closed.)

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.
 
[...] Why are leftists so totally non credible, whining about what the US allegedly did in 1953, but silent on iran doing 1000 times worse in iraq in 2003 forward?
I bet some people warned of the consequences of deposing Saddam. What did they know, eh?

Well you can't hide a Saddam supporter!

And what a shocker that such is nearly exclusively found in the ranks of the Ideological LEFT!

LOL! Yet another demonstration of Relativism: ON PARADE!
 
It is not true that they have never been in compliance. Their nuclear program dates back to the days of the Shaw. Before they started enriching uranium, they were in compliance. No, they are not currently in compliance. That is the issue that the UN Security Council members, including the U.S., are trying to address with these negotiations.
As a matter of interest, in what area is Iran non-compliant with the NNPT?
 
Actually idiot, I know it better than anyone on this forum. The US gave iranians some money to overthrow a PM who had tried to take the powers of the shah, according to the iranian constitution. Mossadegh was never elected, he was appointed by the shah to his position. Go read the de-classified CIA papers - all of them. I have, did you? The US did not overthrow any government, it is a KGB lie, and low information obama voters like you love to lap it up.
Fair point, Mosaddegh was appointed, it was his government that was elected.

Oil nationalization and the 1953 coup

https://en.wikipedia.org

Under the leadership of Mossaddegh's democratically elected nationalist movement, the Iranian parliament unanimously voted to nationalize the oil industry – thus shutting out the immensely profitable AIOC, which was a pillar of Britain's economy and provided it political clout in the region.[16]
 
No you did not. To do so you would have needed to explain why I was wrong, something you are incapable of doing. Why not find another hobby, one in which you might have some competence? You do a good job of parroting right wing propaganda, but therein is the full measure of your ability (so to speak).
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.

The Mission was Accomplished... and Combat operations were over. THEN the Ideological Left kicked in, ignited a media frenzy over a naked Islamic pyramid and the insuregency of Al Qaeda in Iraq began.

Which required that anti-insurgency tactics be instituted; which are wholly distinct from 'Combat Operations' relative to the invasion of Iraq and the first to dismantle the Iraqi Islamic-Socialist government.

But, in fairness to you, as a relativist, there is no way you could have known that.

Another spin that won't turn. As a realist I can walk in any US Cemetery and read the names of those who fell after Major Combat Operations 'succeeded'. Bush's Crusade was an abject failure, measured by its cost in blood and treasure, and the current state of world affairs. Point fingers all you please, the rewrite of history is all you and you kind have, but don't expect anyone to buy your bull shit.

(The Reader should note that the use of 'spin' is a substitution for 'truth', which as you know, is a concept with which the lowly Relativists are not familiar. So they use phrasing which better fits within the Relativist bent, wherein 'truth' is whatever the individual 'feels' it is... 'relative' or 'subject' to their own personal needs, wants and desires... .

Suffice it to say that casualties incurred in the wake of major combat operations closing, in no way determines that major combat, relevant to the invasion of Iraq and the removal of the Iraqi-Islamic/Socialist Government, had closed.)

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

The Jury is out: is keys

a. a liar

b. a narcissist

c. a liar and a narcissist

d. a liar, a narcissist and challenged by reality
 
They have been out of compliance since 2002.
I'd still like to know where this matter of non-compliance is centred.

Iran’s Nuclear Program: Tehran’s Compliance
with International Obligations

http://fas.org/sgp/crs/nuke/R40094.pdf

In 2002, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) began investigating allegations thatIran had conducted clandestine nuclear activities. Ultimately, the agency reported that some of these activities had violated Tehran’s IAEA safeguards agreement. The IAEA has not stated definitively that Iran has pursued nuclear weapons, but has also not yet been able to conclude that the country’s nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes. The IAEA Board of Governors referred the matter to the U.N. Security Council in February 2006. Since then, the council has adopted six resolutions, the most recent of which (Resolution 1929) was adopted in June 2010
 
You smary stupid asshole. You threw out the mission accomplished line like the 20 year of comedy skit that it was. You are fucking clueless and too ignorant about American politics to be here pontificating. Don't know it was General Franks idea and I think the head of the middle east operations knew more about it than some retard that tries to impress people on the internet by throwing out tired worn out leftist talking points and accusing others to hide his tactics.

Don't lecture others about knowledge, you have NONE.

Thanks for proving my points. It is called the Mission Accomplished Speech, and Bush did say what I posted and below is a link to evidence:

"Defense.gov News Article President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq"

President Bush Proclaims End to Major Combat Ops in Iraq
By Kathleen T. Rhem
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, May 1, 2003 – Major combat operations in Iraq are over, and America and her allies have prevailed, President Bush said this evening on the flight deck of a U.S. Navy aircraft carrier.

You are now free to cut and run, the usual tactic of right wing loudmouths who don't have a clue.

The Mission was Accomplished... and Combat operations were over. THEN the Ideological Left kicked in, ignited a media frenzy over a naked Islamic pyramid and the insuregency of Al Qaeda in Iraq began.

Which required that anti-insurgency tactics be instituted; which are wholly distinct from 'Combat Operations' relative to the invasion of Iraq and the first to dismantle the Iraqi Islamic-Socialist government.

But, in fairness to you, as a relativist, there is no way you could have known that.

Another spin that won't turn. As a realist I can walk in any US Cemetery and read the names of those who fell after Major Combat Operations 'succeeded'. Bush's Crusade was an abject failure, measured by its cost in blood and treasure, and the current state of world affairs. Point fingers all you please, the rewrite of history is all you and you kind have, but don't expect anyone to buy your bull shit.

(The Reader should note that the use of 'spin' is a substitution for 'truth', which as you know, is a concept with which the lowly Relativists are not familiar. So they use phrasing which better fits within the Relativist bent, wherein 'truth' is whatever the individual 'feels' it is... 'relative' or 'subject' to their own personal needs, wants and desires... .

Suffice it to say that casualties incurred in the wake of major combat operations closing, in no way determines that major combat, relevant to the invasion of Iraq and the removal of the Iraqi-Islamic/Socialist Government, had closed.)

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

The Jury is out: is keys

a. a liar

b. a narcissist

c. a liar and a narcissist

d. a liar, a narcissist and challenged by reality

LOL! A desperate grope for popularity...


(The Reader should recognize this as the fallacious appeal, wherein the popularity of a given position is used to determine the validity of that position. Such is axiomatic in Relativism, despite in reality, there being absolutely no potential correlation between popularity and validity.

Yes, it's all quite sad, but this is what happens when a culture allows the mentally disordered to freely associate with the general population.)
 

Forum List

Back
Top