Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So, the liberal answer to a nuclear Iran is just go along with it. Ha-ha!They know nothing of some of the nasty things the United States has had to do and will continue to do in the name of world security.
That does not mean they cannot express their disagreement on the matter and to let Iran know that most American citizens do not agree with Mr. Obama.
. The majority of Americans favor a potential nuclear deal with Iran, according to a new survey by Shibley Telhami and Steven Kull in the Program for Public Consultation and the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland. More than 60 percent of respondents support a deal that would limit Iran’s enrichment capacity and impose inspections in exchange for lifting some sanctions. The poll was conducted Feb. 19-25, 2015, with a sample of 710 adults.The following are excerpted key findings from the poll.
"In this survey a representative sample of Americans were presented the two primary options that have dominated this debate:
·For the US to continue to pursue an agreement that would accept some enrichment by Iran, but with substantial limits that would preclude Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, and intrusive inspections to ensure those limits are met, in exchange for the lifting of some sanctions.
·For the US to not accept any Iranian enrichment. Instead, the US would continue trying to get other nations to impose new economic sanctions in an effort to persuade Iran to cease enrichment completely.
While majorities found arguments for both options at least somewhat convincing, when asked to make their final recommendation, a clear majority of 61% recommended making a deal with Iran that would include a limited enrichment capacity for Iran. This included 61% of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 54% of independents. The alternative of increasing sanctions in an effort to get Iran to stop all uranium enrichment was endorsed by 36%."
"Majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents all made this same judgment. Republicans chose continuing negotiations by 61 to 35%, while Democrats favored it by 66 to 32%. A relatively more modest majority of Independents favored a deal by 54 to 42%.
This response was essentially the same as when PPC took respondents through the exact same process and found 61% favored a deal and 35% favored pursuing sanctions. Partisan variations were not significantly different. In the current survey, among the 9% of the sample who identified themselves as very sympathetic to the Tea Party, a plurality of 46% favored pursuing a deal with 41% opposed. Those somewhat sympathetic to the Tea Party were no different from the sample as a whole.
So, the liberal answer to a nuclear Iran is just go along with it. Ha-ha!They know nothing of some of the nasty things the United States has had to do and will continue to do in the name of world security.
No they want an agreement. The right has no plan. They want Iran to continue down the to a nuke.
"a clear majority of 61% recommended making a deal with Iran that would include a limited enrichment capacity for Iran. This included 61% of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 54% of independents." University of Maryland Poll taken February 2015.
And:
Americans back Iran deal by 2-to-1 margin: Reuters/Ipsos poll. BY MATT SPETALNICK. WASHINGTON Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:49pm EST
AP-GfK Poll. Jan. 17-21, 2014. Do you approve, disapprove, or neither approve nor disapprove of the interim agreement reached between Iran and six world powers that is designed to curb Iran’s nuclear program?
Total approve: 60 percent. Total disapprove: 36 percent
It's been very consistent since the negotiations bean in 2013:
ChrL 10956880That does not mean they cannot express their disagreement on the matter and to let Iran know that most American citizens do not agree with Mr. Obama.
This University of Maryland Poll says you are wrong:
Poll Majority of Americans Back Nuke Deal The Iran Primer
Poll: Majority of Americans Back Nuke Deal
March 3, 2015 | 12:30pm
. The majority of Americans favor a potential nuclear deal with Iran, according to a new survey by Shibley Telhami and Steven Kull in the Program for Public Consultation and the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland. More than 60 percent of respondents support a deal that would limit Iran’s enrichment capacity and impose inspections in exchange for lifting some sanctions. The poll was conducted Feb. 19-25, 2015, with a sample of 710 adults.The following are excerpted key findings from the poll.
"In this survey a representative sample of Americans were presented the two primary options that have dominated this debate:
·For the US to continue to pursue an agreement that would accept some enrichment by Iran, but with substantial limits that would preclude Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, and intrusive inspections to ensure those limits are met, in exchange for the lifting of some sanctions.
·For the US to not accept any Iranian enrichment. Instead, the US would continue trying to get other nations to impose new economic sanctions in an effort to persuade Iran to cease enrichment completely.
While majorities found arguments for both options at least somewhat convincing, when asked to make their final recommendation, a clear majority of 61% recommended making a deal with Iran that would include a limited enrichment capacity for Iran. This included 61% of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 54% of independents. The alternative of increasing sanctions in an effort to get Iran to stop all uranium enrichment was endorsed by 36%."
"Majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents all made this same judgment. Republicans chose continuing negotiations by 61 to 35%, while Democrats favored it by 66 to 32%. A relatively more modest majority of Independents favored a deal by 54 to 42%.
This response was essentially the same as when PPC took respondents through the exact same process and found 61% favored a deal and 35% favored pursuing sanctions. Partisan variations were not significantly different. In the current survey, among the 9% of the sample who identified themselves as very sympathetic to the Tea Party, a plurality of 46% favored pursuing a deal with 41% opposed. Those somewhat sympathetic to the Tea Party were no different from the sample as a whole.
Do you believe in subscribing to facts?
Pakistan has a much more secular type of governing body than does Iran. There are big differences, but obviously you have no idea what you're babbling on about.
Does Iran have Taliban inside their country fighting the military?
Some of the younger more educated people of Iran were trying to fight the military. Most of them have disappeared.
So no they don't. Thank you.
What does the Taliban have to do with Iran and the crazy mullahs obtaining nuclear power? Please elaborate because you aren't making any sense and you are jumping all over the place, just like you do when your ass has been handed to you on any of the gun threads.![]()
My point is that Pakistan is Moslem and much less stable.
"a clear majority of 61% recommended making a deal with Iran that would include a limited enrichment capacity for Iran. This included 61% of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 54% of independents." University of Maryland Poll taken February 2015.
And:
Americans back Iran deal by 2-to-1 margin: Reuters/Ipsos poll. BY MATT SPETALNICK. WASHINGTON Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:49pm EST
AP-GfK Poll. Jan. 17-21, 2014. Do you approve, disapprove, or neither approve nor disapprove of the interim agreement reached between Iran and six world powers that is designed to curb Iran’s nuclear program?
Total approve: 60 percent. Total disapprove: 36 percent
It's been very consistent since the negotiations began in 2013:
ChrL 10956880That does not mean they cannot express their disagreement on the matter and to let Iran know that most American citizens do not agree with Mr. Obama.
This University of Maryland Poll says you are wrong:
Poll Majority of Americans Back Nuke Deal The Iran Primer
Poll: Majority of Americans Back Nuke Deal
March 3, 2015 | 12:30pm
. The majority of Americans favor a potential nuclear deal with Iran, according to a new survey by Shibley Telhami and Steven Kull in the Program for Public Consultation and the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland. More than 60 percent of respondents support a deal that would limit Iran’s enrichment capacity and impose inspections in exchange for lifting some sanctions. The poll was conducted Feb. 19-25, 2015, with a sample of 710 adults.The following are excerpted key findings from the poll.
"In this survey a representative sample of Americans were presented the two primary options that have dominated this debate:
·For the US to continue to pursue an agreement that would accept some enrichment by Iran, but with substantial limits that would preclude Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, and intrusive inspections to ensure those limits are met, in exchange for the lifting of some sanctions.
·For the US to not accept any Iranian enrichment. Instead, the US would continue trying to get other nations to impose new economic sanctions in an effort to persuade Iran to cease enrichment completely.
While majorities found arguments for both options at least somewhat convincing, when asked to make their final recommendation, a clear majority of 61% recommended making a deal with Iran that would include a limited enrichment capacity for Iran. This included 61% of Republicans, 66% of Democrats and 54% of independents. The alternative of increasing sanctions in an effort to get Iran to stop all uranium enrichment was endorsed by 36%."
"Majorities of Republicans, Democrats and independents all made this same judgment. Republicans chose continuing negotiations by 61 to 35%, while Democrats favored it by 66 to 32%. A relatively more modest majority of Independents favored a deal by 54 to 42%.
This response was essentially the same as when PPC took respondents through the exact same process and found 61% favored a deal and 35% favored pursuing sanctions. Partisan variations were not significantly different. In the current survey, among the 9% of the sample who identified themselves as very sympathetic to the Tea Party, a plurality of 46% favored pursuing a deal with 41% opposed. Those somewhat sympathetic to the Tea Party were no different from the sample as a whole.
Do you believe in subscribing to facts?
Does Iran have Taliban inside their country fighting the military?
Some of the younger more educated people of Iran were trying to fight the military. Most of them have disappeared.
So no they don't. Thank you.
What does the Taliban have to do with Iran and the crazy mullahs obtaining nuclear power? Please elaborate because you aren't making any sense and you are jumping all over the place, just like you do when your ass has been handed to you on any of the gun threads.![]()
My point is that Pakistan is Moslem and much less stable.
I agree, with the strength of the Taliban presence in Pakistan, Pakistan is much more volatile. It's a very scary scenario being as Pakistan isn't working on a nuclear program, they already has nuclear weapons,
Does Iran have Taliban inside their country fighting the military?
Some of the younger more educated people of Iran were trying to fight the military. Most of them have disappeared.
So no they don't. Thank you.
What does the Taliban have to do with Iran and the crazy mullahs obtaining nuclear power? Please elaborate because you aren't making any sense and you are jumping all over the place, just like you do when your ass has been handed to you on any of the gun threads.![]()
My point is that Pakistan is Moslem and much less stable.
I agree, with the strength of the Taliban presence in Pakistan, Pakistan is much more volatile. It's a very scary scenario being as Pakistan isn't working on a nuclear program, they already has nuclear weapons. The Taliban have been proven to have friends within the Pakistani government.
BS......the right plan is to deal with a bully using tactics only a lying bully understands....none of this soft-serve idiocy that BO is promoting...So, the liberal answer to a nuclear Iran is just go along with it. Ha-ha!They know nothing of some of the nasty things the United States has had to do and will continue to do in the name of world security.
No they want an agreement. The right has no plan. They want Iran to continue down the to a nuke.
So what? All the Republicans did was make the U.S. appear weak and divisive. The message we just sent to the world, not just Iran, is don't make deals with the U.S., we don't keep them.
With all the complaints about Iran not being trustworthy to keep up their end of any deal, we just advertised that it's us who don't keep deals. We're now the ones who can't be trusted.
So what? All the Republicans did was make the U.S. appear weak and divisive. The message we just sent to the world, not just Iran, is don't make deals with the U.S., we don't keep them.
With obama infuriating and abandoning so many allies, who on earth trusts the US anymore? Is is an accident that Japan is ramping up its military?
With all the complaints about Iran not being trustworthy to keep up their end of any deal, we just advertised that it's us who don't keep deals. We're now the ones who can't be trusted.
Trusting the US is not the issue, it is that the obama team of failures and amateurs has conceded everything in these pointless talks - why don't you describe exactly what concessions iran has made?
Given that obama has tried to shut out congress completely on this issue, that every leak on what is being worked on simply amounts to more concessions by the dreadfully incompetent Kerry, and that it is obvious to all how desperate obama is to strike a deal no matter what the cost is to America's deterrence, standing in the world and its national security, it is hardly surprising that the senators are informing iran that this sweetheart deal obama is gifting them will not stand.
What we need is an agreement so they realize they don't need and shouldn't want one. No agreement and they feel they need one.
Yes elected in a state, not nationally. The whole country elected Obama. Speak out yes, send a letter to a foreign country no. They are an embarrassment.
with the price of oil down right now we could really put the screws to Iran....Oh, I do have some ideas. We need to buckle down on these other trouble-making countries. To all the countries that will not go along with sanctions, then we need to cut them off from our aid money and write them off as an enemy to the US and the world security.
US gives billions in foreign aid to world s richest countries then asks to borrow it back Daily Mail Online
Somebody needs to step up and make us look like weak morons to the rest of the world? No I don't think we needed that.
By not abiding by Iran's wishes, we look weak?Figures a weak little scaredy cat like yourself would think so.
Abiding by Iran's wishes? And what are those wishes?
What the hell do you think we've been talking about all this time? Duh. Try and follow along.
I am asking you what YOU think those wishes are.
Now I am asking you, do you trust Iran with nuclear capabilities? Are they just a harmless misunderstood country in your opinion?What do you think will happen if they ever obtained nuclear weapons?
Does any one else wonder why Reagan and company were sooooo damn trusting of the Iranians during the Iran-Contra scandal??
Just asking........
They actually sold arms to Iran right?