Republicans are afraid to propose spending cuts!

Yeah, right. Goldman Sachs has never received any benefits from the Obama administration, have they? What possible ulterior motive could they have for brown nosing the president?

Sure. But only for a short while. Paulson's Treasury (the department) was a Goldman branch office.


ROFL! Aren't you forgetting that little Timothy Ghietner is a former Goldman Sachs employee? How much TARP money did Goldman Sachs receive?

Shit head, no doubt. But nowhere near the Paulson sucker of Satan dick level. You read the wiki on Hank? More than a mere employee and surrounded himself with Goldman executive over at Treasury. Quite a windfall for Goldman. Seems Bush 43's Wall Street bailout made for some sweet Xmas bonuses, while Goldman rivals didn't fare so well.

Imagine that.
 
the CEO of Goldman Sacks..

now not only are they talking orders from billionaires (Buffet) now they are taking advice from Goldman Sacks

the Democrat party of the LITTLE people...like hell
Buffet actually runs Bershire Hathaway, not Goldman Sachs. but thanks for trying.

and Wall Street has long been a GOP safe haven.
 
the CEO of Goldman Sacks..

now not only are they talking orders from billionaires (Buffet) now they are taking advice from Goldman Sacks

the Democrat party of the LITTLE people...like hell
Buffet actually runs Bershire Hathaway, not Goldman Sachs. but thanks for trying.

and Wall Street has long been a GOP safe haven.

Buffet runs a lot of things, including Obama and the Democrat party.

got to love it..
 
the CEO of Goldman Sacks..

now not only are they talking orders from billionaires (Buffet) now they are taking advice from Goldman Sacks

the Democrat party of the LITTLE people...like hell
Buffet actually runs Bershire Hathaway, not Goldman Sachs. but thanks for trying.

and Wall Street has long been a GOP safe haven.

Copy that. In fact Buffett is known for being Mr. Squeaky Clean. Investment firms caught doing wrong, and fearing capital flight, brought Warren in to calm the natives. And like Birkshires other holdings, the Omaha Oracle made them into bigger and more profitable companies, employing tons of folks.

Sorta the contra-Romney, which is why the Righties are so prickly on the subject of Buffett.
 
Yeah, right. Goldman Sachs has never received any benefits from the Obama administration, have they? What possible ulterior motive could they have for brown nosing the president?

Sure. But only for a short while. Paulson's Treasury (the department) was a Goldman branch office.


ROFL! Aren't you forgetting that little Timothy Ghietner is a former Goldman Sachs employee? How much TARP money did Goldman Sachs receive?

Another post showing just how bad a "socialist/communist", Obama is..

:lol:
 
the CEO of Goldman Sacks..

now not only are they talking orders from billionaires (Buffet) now they are taking advice from Goldman Sacks

the Democrat party of the LITTLE people...like hell
Buffet actually runs Bershire Hathaway, not Goldman Sachs. but thanks for trying.

and Wall Street has long been a GOP safe haven.

Buffet runs a lot of things, including Obama and the Democrat party.

Yup -- he does it so his own taxes get raised. Gotta love it, indeed.
 
the CEO of Goldman Sacks..

now not only are they talking orders from billionaires (Buffet) now they are taking advice from Goldman Sacks

the Democrat party of the LITTLE people...like hell
Buffet actually runs Bershire Hathaway, not Goldman Sachs. but thanks for trying.

and Wall Street has long been a GOP safe haven.

Buffet runs a lot of things, including Obama and the Democrat party.

got to love it..

Buffett "runs" Berkshire-Hathaway.

Berkshire Hathaway - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.: NYSE:BRK.A quotes & news - Google Finance
 
youre a moron. you deride the presidents plans, but are more than willing to accept that fact the GOP doesnt have a plan at all.

wingnut logic from a wingnut.

Sorry, but there's no logical connection between those to claims. Whether the GOP has a plan or not has no bearing on whether the president's plans are idiotic. Obama claimed he had a "balanced" plan, so he's on the hook for one. Where's the balance? Where are the spending cuts to balance his revenue increases?

The Republicans never claimed to have a plan, so they aren't on the hook for one. I know that Obama fluffers like you are wishing desperately for the Republicans to fall on their sword and offer up a pile of spending cuts that you can use to paint them as "mean" and "callous" with, but they just aren't going to do it.
the CEO of Goldman Sach calls Obama's plan credible. pretty sure he's about 1000x more intelligent than you are.

Blankfein Calls Obama's Fiscal Cliff Plan "Credible" - Business Insider


According to CNBC's Katie Little, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein characterized Obama's fiscal cliff plan as "very credible" and expressed optimism about a deal getting done.
Right....Good for all the 1%-ers at Goldman Sachs. :rolleyes:

Prolly a bunch of loot in there to keep the securities bubble pumped up for awhile longer.
 
Sorry, but there's no logical connection between those to claims. Whether the GOP has a plan or not has no bearing on whether the president's plans are idiotic. Obama claimed he had a "balanced" plan, so he's on the hook for one. Where's the balance? Where are the spending cuts to balance his revenue increases?

The Republicans never claimed to have a plan, so they aren't on the hook for one. I know that Obama fluffers like you are wishing desperately for the Republicans to fall on their sword and offer up a pile of spending cuts that you can use to paint them as "mean" and "callous" with, but they just aren't going to do it.
the CEO of Goldman Sach calls Obama's plan credible. pretty sure he's about 1000x more intelligent than you are.

Blankfein Calls Obama's Fiscal Cliff Plan "Credible" - Business Insider


According to CNBC's Katie Little, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein characterized Obama's fiscal cliff plan as "very credible" and expressed optimism about a deal getting done.
Right....Good for all the 1%-ers at Goldman Sachs. :rolleyes:

Prolly a bunch of loot in there to keep the securities bubble pumped up for awhile longer.
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
 
the CEO of Goldman Sach calls Obama's plan credible. pretty sure he's about 1000x more intelligent than you are.

Blankfein Calls Obama's Fiscal Cliff Plan "Credible" - Business Insider


According to CNBC's Katie Little, Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein characterized Obama's fiscal cliff plan as "very credible" and expressed optimism about a deal getting done.
Right....Good for all the 1%-ers at Goldman Sachs. :rolleyes:

Prolly a bunch of loot in there to keep the securities bubble pumped up for awhile longer.
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
I'm saying that there's most likely some big fat spending and/or special tax sops in there for a Wall Street buttboy like Blankfein, to come out in support of the alleged plan of Boiking, which nobody else seems to have seen.
 
Right....Good for all the 1%-ers at Goldman Sachs. :rolleyes:

Prolly a bunch of loot in there to keep the securities bubble pumped up for awhile longer.
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
I'm saying that there's most likely some big fat spending and/or special tax sops in there for a Wall Street buttboy like Blankfein, to come out in support of the alleged plan of Boiking, which nobody else seems to have seen.
historically wall street has been a mainstay of the GOP. they were the ones who came running to the Bush administration when the financial markets collapsed. the GOP also used to use the stock market as an indicator as to where the economy was growing or contracting. since Obama has taken office they have abandoned this philosophy, this is probably due to the fact the under Obama the stock market went from 6500 to 13,025 (as of today). a 100% increase aint bad.....
 
Right....Good for all the 1%-ers at Goldman Sachs. :rolleyes:

Prolly a bunch of loot in there to keep the securities bubble pumped up for awhile longer.
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
I'm saying that there's most likely some big fat spending and/or special tax sops

If you really want to be cynical, there are much more likely motives. Like Wall Street trying to improve relations with the White House after betting heavily on Romney.

Especially in the light of more financial regulations coming from the Administration.
 
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
I'm saying that there's most likely some big fat spending and/or special tax sops

If you really want to be cynical, there are much more likely motives. Like Wall Street trying to improve relations with the White House after betting heavily on Romney.

Especially in the light of more financial regulations coming from the Administration.
They don't have to improve relations with people who are in their hip pocket.

You did notice that GS was one of the big beneficiaries of TARP, didn't you?
 
I believe neither party wants to cut spending to any of their own programs.

So you think Republicans don't want to detail how they would like to cut entitlement spending because they own those programs?

Not necessarily.

I just believe that if the Republicans bite the bullet and concede to cut defense spending along with raising taxes for the wealthy first, democrats won't have to compromise anything and we could avoid the fiscal cliff.

I also think you're right in the sense that them advocating to cut entitlements would open the door for the dems to continue painting them as selfish, greedy, un-caring, ect.. So proposals to cut entitlements would have to come from the Democrats. Plus, that's their bread and butter. Why shouldn't they get to decide how to cut spending to them?
The bully pulpit from the left. Cutiting defense spending is stupid. The idiot in the wh and other dimwits are the bullies.
 
so are you saying the 1% are actually ok with the taxes going up? Great then the GOP should have no other issues in approving the plan.
I'm saying that there's most likely some big fat spending and/or special tax sops in there for a Wall Street buttboy like Blankfein, to come out in support of the alleged plan of Boiking, which nobody else seems to have seen.
historically wall street has been a mainstay of the GOP. they were the ones who came running to the Bush administration when the financial markets collapsed. the GOP also used to use the stock market as an indicator as to where the economy was growing or contracting. since Obama has taken office they have abandoned this philosophy, this is probably due to the fact the under Obama the stock market went from 6500 to 13,025 (as of today). a 100% increase aint bad.....
You're so full of shit the your eyes are brown.

Wall Street has always played both sides of the fence, if for no better reason that it's good for bidness.

Oh, and I don't suppose that the Fed printing up trillions of dollars and keeping interest rates ridiculously low has had any effect on money flooding into securities, huh?...And you wonder why the GS CEO supports the mythical plan of the Boiking?

Damn, you are one naïve dude, aintcha?
 

Forum List

Back
Top