Oldstyle
Platinum Member
- Jul 19, 2011
- 31,206
- 4,935
You'd better read up. What you believe to be true isn't. He and his small team decided it was safe enough to go there. How long before you acknowledge that? And how long before you acknowledge that the embassy was, on the very same day, safe? He had more people, and he didn't take them with him, You won't get around his decisions.1. The embassy was stable and their mission was over.Explain one thing to me, Paint...
Why would you shrink that security force THAT drastically with everything that was going on in Libya? Why would anyone do that?
2. Would they have been with Stevens that night regardless? He had more people so why did he go, during that timeframe, with such a small group?
Like it or not, it was his call, period.
Their mission was over? How is it possible that a security team's mission would be "over" when security threats were increasing by leaps and bounds in Libya? Nothing in Libya was "stable"...that was simply the narrative that the Clinton State Department was putting out to put a good face on things! In reality it was becoming so dangerous that Great Britain had pulled it's diplomats out and the Red Cross had pulled it's people out.
How is it Christopher Steven's "call"? He obviously wanted more security BUT HE'S NOT IN CHARGE!!! He had to request security from Washington...WHICH HE DOES REPEATEDLY!!! They turn those requests down...REPEATEDLY!!! Then you try and blame it on Stevens? Say that it was his call, period? That's absurd!
He only had 9 you flaming idiot! Some would have had to stay to guard the embassy! So how many do you think that leaves him for his trip to Benghazi?