"Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal"

Bottom line is this, Kiddies...the efforts to stonewall the investigations into Benghazi by the Obama White House may have helped Barry get reelected in 2012 but with information like the Ben Rhodes email coming out after through Freedom of Information law suits years later all that stonewalling has done is to prolong the investigations until right before Hillary makes her run for President. Not the brightest political move on her part. She would have been better to simply come clean...admit that she misjudged the security situation in Libya badly...take the blame and move on. The whole "YouTube" thing simply makes her look dishonest as well as incompetent and the public is getting rather tired of that combination in the White House.
 
Sigh. The GOP committee is clear that the far right neo-cons are full of crap.
 

The people that have "no shame" are people like you, R-Derp...who continue to attempt to pass blame on Benghazi to GOP budget cuts when the State Department's Charlene Lamb testified under oath that budget cuts had nothing to do with security personnel being drawn down prior to the Benghazi attacks.
So what? What is proves is Republicans don't give a shit unless they can play politics with it. Why? Because so many of the GOP are "tics". They put the "tics" into "Politics".

So what? Since Lamb's testimony made it crystal clear that the budget had NOTHING to do with the security draw down in Libya...then you know as well as I do that those proposed budget increases that were cut by the GOP had nothing to do with what happened in Benghazi...yet you're here making that charge! Who's playing politics? Who's distorting what happened with a false narrative? That would be YOU!
 
Saying a committee that was led by Democrats is a "GOP committee" is laughable. Almost as laughable as R-Derps claim that GOP budget cuts were to blame or Joey's claim that more security wouldn't have mattered because "thousands" attacked our consulate!
 
Do you think a "decent" person would look the mother of a murdered man in the eye as they were unloading his casket from the plane and tell that grieving mother that they will make the man who made the terrible video who caused the death of her son pay for what he's done... all the time KNOWING that the video had nothing to do with the attack and that THEY are the person who (next to the actual attackers) is the person who's policies caused that death!

Hillary Clinton did exactly that. Think about that long and hard. What kind of cold-hearted bitch does that?

Sorry, man, they really were upset about the video. and that guy should have gone to prison for it.

Well yes they were, but no he should not go to prison for it. Not in this country.
 
Bwahahahahaaaaaa.....

You airhead righties often post links to HotAir.com as fact.

Now what do you have to say? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!


Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal
Republicans finally admit there is no Benghazi scandal Hot Air Headlines


Oh, wait! Just to corroborate your beloved blog, your beloved Washington Examiner says it ain't so either, TOOLS.

House Benghazi report delivers mixed story of heroism, policy failures

"""A two-year congressional investigation into the deadly 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic post in Benghazi, Libya, found that while the State Department ignored warnings of terrorist threats, Obama administration appointees weren’t directly to blame.
The report, conducted by the Republican-run House Intelligence Committee and declassified Friday, debunks several conspiracies regarding the administration’s involvement in the attacks that killed U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other Americans.""

House Benghazi report delivers mixed story of heroism policy failures WashingtonExaminer.com

What idiots, chasing shiny things that the GOP throws in your path.

9 fuggin fools.

:D

The Gowdy Hearings will be the definitive word on the matter.

Chill til then.
 
Bengeezer has lost it.

stonewalling the investigation, all 13 of them .... riiiiiiiiiiiiight.
 
Let's stop the Leftist insanity.


Ted Cruz Wants Answers to These 4 Questions on Benghazi

Ted Cruz Wants Answers to These 4 Questions on Benghazi
Rob Bluey

May 6, 2014 at 9:30 am

(58)


Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, is frustrated by the Obama administration’s “stonewalling” on the Benghazi investigation – and he wants answers about the 2012 terrorist attack.

Speaking to Fox News’ Neil Cavuto yesterday, Cruz said: “We have four dead Americans. We have the first dead U.S. Ambassador killed in service since 1979. In the 19 months that have followed, we don’t have a single dead terrorist or a single terrorist apprehended, and what we have seen from the president and Senate Democrats has been stonewalling.”

Here are the four questions Cruz wants the Obama administration to answer:

  1. Why did the State Department repeatedly refuse to provide additional security as was requested by personnel on the ground?

  2. Why did the United States not have military assets in place to protect American men and women on Sept. 11, 2012, when there was increased terrorist activity in the region?

  3. During the Benghazi attack, why didn’t the United States send in forces to protect the four men who lost their lives?

  4. In the 19 months that have followed, why has no one been apprehended, and no one been brought to justice?
Last year, Cruz introduced a Senate resolution calling for a joint select committee to investigate the Benghazi attacks. The House of Representatives is moving forward with its own select committee, which will be led by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C.

>>> Q&A: Does a Benghazi Select Committee Matter?

“The truth shouldn’t be partisan,” Cruz said. “Finding out what happened, finding out how we could have prevented it, and acting to actually apprehend these guys, should not be partisan.”

This story was produced by The Foundry’s news team. Nothing here should be construed as necessarily reflecting the views of The Heritage Foundation.
 
Oldstyle, don't play silly games.

Your body of posting clearly shows you don't get "just once more."

The GOP committee has clearly refuted the nonsense from the far right haters.

Oh, about Cruz and his 'questions'?: tell him to read the report.
 
Oldstyle, don't play silly games.

Your body of posting clearly shows you don't get "just once more."

The GOP committee has clearly refuted the nonsense from the far right haters.

Oh, about Cruz and his 'questions'?: tell him to read the report.

Okay, MY bad for posting a piece from last May.

Does the current report answer Cruz's 3rd Question?

"During the Benghazi attack, why didn’t the United States send in forces to protect the four men who lost their lives?"
 
I dont get the point of this thread at all. Is the OP mad at the media for not reporting what the republicans are not putting out there?

Is the OP mad about Drone Strikes and torture? Or mad about just one?

Bengeezer has lost it.

stonewalling the investigation, all 13 of them .... riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

None of those other investigations had subpoena powers.

The Gowdy committee does.


yada yada yada ... Gowdy SAID he had hard evidence 6 months before Issa threw in the towel .. so why didn' t Issa use it ?

because there wasn't any ...

LOL

Next.
 
Oldstyle, don't play silly games.

Your body of posting clearly shows you don't get "just once more."

The GOP committee has clearly refuted the nonsense from the far right haters.

Oh, about Cruz and his 'questions'?: tell him to read the report.

Okay, MY bad for posting a piece from last May.

Does the current report answer Cruz's 3rd Question?

"During the Benghazi attack, why didn’t the United States send in forces to protect the four men who lost their lives?"

Be like Pelosi, read it and find out.
 
Senator Lindsey Graham: Is there a saying in the military, “When you go into harm’s way, we’ve got your back?”
General Martin Dempsey: Of course, yes, sir.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Don’t you think that saying has been undermined here? That, how can people in the military or the foreign service believe we’ve got their back when after over seven – What – did you know how long the attack was going to last, Secretary Panetta?

Secretary Leon Panetta: No idea.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Well, it could have lasted for two days. Now, my question is, was one airplane anywhere in the world deployed in the aid of the consulate? Did anybody launch an airplane? Was any airplane launched anywhere in the world to help these people?

Secretary Leon Panetta: Well, we ultimately did launch 130′s to go in and rescue the people.

Senator Lindsey Graham: When were they launched?

Secretary Leon Panetta: They were launched at – in the period of time when the team went in there and when we, concluded, the attack was concluded, we said we’ve got to get the people out of there and that’s when -

Senator Lindsey Graham: Was there any airplane launched anywhere in the world before the attack was concluded?

General Martin Dempsey: If you’re talking about a strike aircraft, no, Senator.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Okay. Was any soldier en route to help these people before the attack was concluded?

Secretary Leon Panetta: Well, we had deployed these FAST teams, and they were on orders to move.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Were they on – was anybody in motion before the attack concluded to help these people? Anybody?

General Martin Dempsey: Only the personnel that were in Tripoli.

Senator Lindsey Graham: Okay, was any DoD asset ever deployed to help these people before the end of the attack?

General Martin Dempsey: Would you rephrase – would you repeat -

Senator Lindsey Graham: Was any DoD asset, aircraft or individual soldier, ever sent, put in motion to help these people before the attack was over?

General Martin Dempsey: Let, if I could, the, as soon as we knew there was an attack, the National Mission Force and the FAST teams began preparing to deploy.

Senator Lindsey Graham: My question is, did anybody leave any base anywhere to go to the aid of the people under attack in Benghazi, Libya, before the attack ended?

Secretary Leon Panetta: No, because the attack ended before they could get off the ground.


Senator Lindsey Graham: Thank you, thank you. Okay, and we didn’t know how long it would last.

Benghazi Testimony with Panetta and Dempsey - Shocking Revelations
 
the only shocking going on is the RW's ability to keep slobbering about Benghazi.
 

Forum List

Back
Top