Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
Gay penguins in Kent zoo are 'the best parents' - BBC News
You are wrong.
You are wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
False!Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
Nonsense.
When stripped of all bullshit, the goal of life is to procreate. Species evolve in a manner to ensure the survival of the species, to pass on the genetic material to the next generation. Homosexuality ensures that the genetic code of the inflicted ends with that person.
It's natures little way of saying "get the fuck out of the gene pool."
It's a genetic kill switch to weed out genes that are undesirable to the species.
False!
If homosexuality was not a viable survival strategy in nature, natural selection would have stopped producing animals that had that so called defect millions of years ago.
Btw gay people do procreate and raise children.
So as always your "theory"is a steaming pile of non sense.
Speaking of ignorant, cancers are the model of survival strategies they reproduces rapidly and exponentially, are hard it kill.False!
If homosexuality was not a viable survival strategy in nature, natural selection would have stopped producing animals that had that so called defect millions of years ago.
Btw gay people do procreate and raise children.
So as always your "theory"is a steaming pile of non sense.
ROFL
You are an ignorant fool.
If cancer was not a viable survival strategy in nature, natural selection would have stopped producing animals that had that so called defect millions of years ago.
Retard.
Speaking of ignorant, cancers are the model of survival strategies they reproduces rapidly and exponentially, are hard it kill.
They can lie dormant for extended periods.
And you say I'm ignorant.
ROFL!
Since I'm not by any measure ignorant, your observation is as always false.Speaking of ignorant, cancers are the model of survival strategies they reproduces rapidly and exponentially, are hard it kill.
They can lie dormant for extended periods.
And you say I'm ignorant.
ROFL!
I see, so you view your ignorance as a virtue.
You are one dumb motherfucker, truly.
Why do you assholes need to misrepresent others? Is it possible you know you're full of shit? Because if your weren't there would be no need to bother. So the bodies of identical twins are the same but their brains are different, and you buy that?Yes, I said it was from a while ago. That's not a big sampling, it sounds like they were trying to confirm what they believed. Like i said, there are twins with different desires. Human sexuality is complex, I don't care what people do, neither do most people. They just don't like getting sued for shying away from things that make them feel uncomfortable.A "gay gene" is much different than brain structure.
You DO realize that there is no such thing as a true "identical twin", because their fingerprints and eye irises (2 modern methods for ID), will be different? If something like that can be different, then why not brain structure? Too bad they didn't have twins they could study as well who had different sexual preferences.
And, since it truly does appear that people are born that way, is it right to discriminate against them for it?
If so, then we should discriminate against anyone who isn't formed perfect and straight, meaning discriminate against those with Down's syndrome as well?
Or, do we simply accept them as being different and allow them to exist peacefully in our society, with all the benefits that everyone else gets?
Which is it?
The ones not letting others live in peace are those trying to destroy the life of those that disagree with them, that would be the Gaystapo, not the people minding their own business.
Male and female brains are hardwired differently. If you believe a male can have a female brain that goes against evolution, homosexuality doesn't lend itself to reproduction. It makes no sense. Life depends on reproduction, it wouldn't evolve into same sex attraction.Why do you assholes need to misrepresent others? Is it possible you know you're full of shit? Because if your weren't there would be no need to bother. So the bodies of identical twins are the same but their brains are different, and you buy that?Yes, I said it was from a while ago. That's not a big sampling, it sounds like they were trying to confirm what they believed. Like i said, there are twins with different desires. Human sexuality is complex, I don't care what people do, neither do most people. They just don't like getting sued for shying away from things that make them feel uncomfortable.A "gay gene" is much different than brain structure.
You DO realize that there is no such thing as a true "identical twin", because their fingerprints and eye irises (2 modern methods for ID), will be different? If something like that can be different, then why not brain structure? Too bad they didn't have twins they could study as well who had different sexual preferences.
And, since it truly does appear that people are born that way, is it right to discriminate against them for it?
If so, then we should discriminate against anyone who isn't formed perfect and straight, meaning discriminate against those with Down's syndrome as well?
Or, do we simply accept them as being different and allow them to exist peacefully in our society, with all the benefits that everyone else gets?
Which is it?
The ones not letting others live in peace are those trying to destroy the life of those that disagree with them, that would be the Gaystapo, not the people minding their own business.
Identical twins still have different fingerprints and iris patterns than their twin, so yeah, I do think that it is possible for their brains to be structured slightly differently.
All ready addressed and debunked.Male and female brains are hardwired differently. If you believe a male can have a female brain that goes against evolution, homosexuality doesn't lend itself to reproduction. It makes no sense. Life depends on reproduction, it wouldn't evolve into same sex attraction.Why do you assholes need to misrepresent others? Is it possible you know you're full of shit? Because if your weren't there would be no need to bother. So the bodies of identical twins are the same but their brains are different, and you buy that?Yes, I said it was from a while ago. That's not a big sampling, it sounds like they were trying to confirm what they believed. Like i said, there are twins with different desires. Human sexuality is complex, I don't care what people do, neither do most people. They just don't like getting sued for shying away from things that make them feel uncomfortable.A "gay gene" is much different than brain structure.
You DO realize that there is no such thing as a true "identical twin", because their fingerprints and eye irises (2 modern methods for ID), will be different? If something like that can be different, then why not brain structure? Too bad they didn't have twins they could study as well who had different sexual preferences.
And, since it truly does appear that people are born that way, is it right to discriminate against them for it?
If so, then we should discriminate against anyone who isn't formed perfect and straight, meaning discriminate against those with Down's syndrome as well?
Or, do we simply accept them as being different and allow them to exist peacefully in our society, with all the benefits that everyone else gets?
Which is it?
The ones not letting others live in peace are those trying to destroy the life of those that disagree with them, that would be the Gaystapo, not the people minding their own business.
Identical twins still have different fingerprints and iris patterns than their twin, so yeah, I do think that it is possible for their brains to be structured slightly differently.
I don't recall advocating killing homosexuals. Would you kindly point that post out? Perhaps I was drunk.the right to love who they want and to commit to that person for live. The right to be happy and not have others judge him because he is himself.
You don't have join, just let them live and let live.
>>And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him: And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked. (Mark 14:51-52, KJV<<
Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
No, homosexuals don't exist in animals, that's not how nature designed genders. There are reasons less dominant males would groom each other but they aren't having anal sex. Male mammals prefer females in the real world. So much of the gay agenda is based on lies and distortions, that's the real problem, not so much what they do in private, most folks don't care.
And yes, I am well familiar with the militant gay twist to Mark 14. It's laughable.
Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
Nonsense.
When stripped of all bullshit, the goal of life is to procreate. Species evolve in a manner to ensure the survival of the species, to pass on the genetic material to the next generation. Homosexuality ensures that the genetic code of the inflicted ends with that person.
It's natures little way of saying "get the fuck out of the gene pool."
It's a genetic kill switch to weed out genes that are undesirable to the species.
Bravo!I don't recall advocating killing homosexuals. Would you kindly point that post out? Perhaps I was drunk.the right to love who they want and to commit to that person for live. The right to be happy and not have others judge him because he is himself.
You don't have join, just let them live and let live.
>>And there followed him a certain young man, having a linen cloth cast about his naked body; and the young men laid hold on him: And he left the linen cloth, and fled from them naked. (Mark 14:51-52, KJV<<
Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
No, homosexuals don't exist in animals, that's not how nature designed genders. There are reasons less dominant males would groom each other but they aren't having anal sex. Male mammals prefer females in the real world. So much of the gay agenda is based on lies and distortions, that's the real problem, not so much what they do in private, most folks don't care.
And yes, I am well familiar with the militant gay twist to Mark 14. It's laughable.
~~~~~~
1,500 animal species practice homosexuality
~~~~
Mammals
Main article: List of mammals displaying homosexual behavior
Selected mammals from the full list:
Birds
- Bison[13]
- Brown bear[14]
- Brown rat[15]
- Cavy[15]
- Caribou[16]
- Cat (domestic)[17]
- Cattle (domestic)[18]
- Chimpanzee[19][20][21][22]
- Common dolphin[23]
- Common marmoset[24]
- Dog[25]
- Elephant[26]
- Fox[27]
- Giraffe[3][28][29]
- Goat[13]
- Horse (domestic)[30]
- Human[31][32][33]
- Koala[34]
- Lion[31]
- Orca[23]
- Raccoon[35]
Main article: List of birds displaying homosexual behavior
Selected birds from the full list:
Fish
- Barn owl[36]
- Chicken[37]
- Common gull[38]
- Emu[39]
- House sparrow[40]
- Kestrel[36]
- King penguin[41]
- Mallard[42]
- Ostrich[39]
- Raven[43]
- Rock dove[44]
- Seagull[45]
Arctic grayling (Thymallus arcticus) leaping for a fly fisherman's bait. Research going back to the 1950s has shown both male and female graylings exhibit homosexual behavior.[46]
Reptiles
- Amazon molly[47]
- Blackstripe topminnow[48]
- Bluegill sunfish[48]
- Char[46]
- Grayling[46]
- European bitterling[49]
- Green swordtail[49]
- Guiana leaffish[50]
- Houting whitefish[46]
- Jewel fish[51]
- Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[49]
- Mouthbreeding fish sp.[48]
- Salmon spp.[52]
- Southern platyfish[49]
- Ten-spined stickleback[49]
- Three-spined stickleback[49]
Three species of Cnemidophorus.
The all-female Whiptail lizard species Cnemidophorus neomexicanus (center), which reproduces via parthenogenesis, is shown flanked by two sexual species having males, C. inornatus (left) and C. tigris (right). Research has shown that simulated mating behavior increases fertility for Cnemidophorus neomexicanus. One female lies on top of another, playing the role of the male, the lizard that was on bottom has larger eggs. The lizards switch off this role each mating season.[53]
Amphibians
- Anole sp.[54]
- Bearded dragon[55]
- Blue-tailed day gecko (Phelsuma cepediana)[56]
- Broad-headed skink[49]
- Checkered whiptail lizard[55]
- Chihuahuan spotted whiptail lizard[55]
- Common ameiva[55]
- Common garter snake[49]
- Cuban green anole[54]
- Desert grassland whiptail lizard[55]
- Desert tortoise[57]
- Fence lizard[disambiguation needed][55]
- Five-lined skink[49]
- Gold dust day gecko (Phelsuma laticauda)[56]
- Gopher (pine) snake[48]
- Green anole[54]
- Inagua curlytail lizard[55]
- Jamaican giant anole[54]
- Laredo striped whiptail lizard[55]
- Largehead anole[54]
- Mourning gecko[58]
- Plateau striped whiptail lizard[55]
- Red diamond rattlesnake[49]
- Red-tailed skink[49]
- Side-blotched lizard[55]
- Speckled rattlesnake[49]
- Water moccasin[49]
- Western rattlesnake (Crotalus viridis)[49]
- Western banded gecko[58]
- Whiptail lizard spp.[55]
- Wood turtle[54]
Insects
- Appalachian woodland salamander[59]
- Black-spotted frog[60]
- Mountain dusky salamander[59]
- Tengger desert toad[54]
The head of a darner dragonfly (Basiaeschna janata).
Male homosexuality has been inferred in several species of dragonflies. A survey of damsel and dragonflies reveals characteristic cloacal pincher mating damage in 20–80 percent of the males, indicating a fairly high occurrence of sexual coupling between males.[61][62]
Male flour beetles are believed by scientists to engage in same-sex coupling to practice mating and to rid themselves of "old, less effective" sperm.[63]
Other invertebrates
- Alfalfa weevil[64]
- Australian parasitic wasp sp.[64]
- Bean weevil sp.[64]
- Bedbug and other bug spp.[65][66]
- Blister beetle spp.[67]
- Blowfly[67]
- Broadwinged damselfly sp.[68]
- Cabbage (small) white (butterfly)[69]
- Checkerspot butterfly[69]
- Club-tailed dragonfly spp.[70]
- Cockroach spp.[71]
- Common skimmer dragonfly spp.[70]
- Creeping water bug sp.[72]
- Cutworm[73]
- Digger bee[74]
- Dragonfly spp.[70]
- Eastern giant ichneumon wasp[64]
- Eucalyptus longhorned borer[72]
- Field cricket sp.[75]
- Flour beetle[63]
- Fruit fly spp.[76]
- Glasswing butterfly[69]
- Hypoponera opacior ant[77]
- Grape berry moth[78]
- Grape borer[72]
- Green lacewing[79]
- Hen flea[79]
- House fly[80]
- Ichneumon wasp sp.[64]
- Japanese scarab beetle[81]
- Larch bud moth[78]
- Large milkweed bug[66]
- Large white[66]
- Long-legged fly spp.[82]
- Mazarine blue[66]
- Mexican white (butterfly)[66]
- Midge sp.[82]
- Migratory locust[83]
- Monarch butterfly[69]
- Narrow-winged damselfly spp.[68]
- Parsnip leaf miner[82]
- Pomace fly[82]
- Queen butterfly[69]
- Red ant sp.[82]
- Red flour beetle[66]
- Reindeer warble fly (Hypoderma tarandi)[82]
- Rose chafer[disambiguation needed][82]
- Rove beetle spp.[66]
- Scarab beetle (melolonthine)[84]
- Screwworm fly[82]
- Silkworm moth[78]
- Southeastern blueberry bee[74]
- Southern green stink bug[66]
- Southern masked chafer[82]
- Southern one-year canegrub[82]
- Spreadwinged damselfly spp.[68]
- Spruce budworm moth[78]
- Stable fly sp.[82]
- Stag beetle spp.[66]
- Tsetse fly[82]
- Water boatman bug[66]
- Water strider spp.[66]
- Blood-fluke[85]
- Box crab[86]
- Harvest spider sp.[87]
- Hawaiian orb-weaver (spider)[87]
- Incirrate octopus spp.[86]
- Jumping spiders[87]
- Mite sp.[82]
- Spiny-headed worm[88]
Time to get over the fact, homosexuality exists, and has for a very long time.
Dinosaurs, animals and man........ nature/god made
Maybe you should be asking - "why shouldn't wo/man be homosexual or bisexual?"
Nature created wiring. Just different, or unique wiring.
Homosexual behavior have existed since dinosaurs and today in most animals species.
It might not be the majority, but it is not unnatural or sinful.
Nonsense.
When stripped of all bullshit, the goal of life is to procreate. Species evolve in a manner to ensure the survival of the species, to pass on the genetic material to the next generation. Homosexuality ensures that the genetic code of the inflicted ends with that person.
It's natures little way of saying "get the fuck out of the gene pool."
It's a genetic kill switch to weed out genes that are undesirable to the species.
Sex is fun. Sex is healthy and necessary part of life for mankind and animals.
It does not matter if you are in a reproductive age or beyond. If sex was just for procreation we would loose the drive after a certain age. If it was just for procreation we would not want sex during pregnancy or while nursing. Women who cannot have children enjoy the benefits of sex.
Not is not just for procreation. Not for man and not for animals.
Good for the brain, for the heart, for the body, for the mental well being.... good, good, good.
Yanno, I thought the only "sin" was to disobey the 10 Commandments, or the 7 Noahide Commandments.
And...................btw............there is nothing in the Bible about lesbians being sinful.
yes there is.
Romans makes it very clear
So what if Jesus did? I'm not a Christian, the US is not a theocracy, and if two dudes want to get down and dirty in the privacy of their own house, it neither s picks my pocket nor breaks my leg.
The whole US Government is based on morals and principals.
You meant to say the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, but you fell off your horse on the way to Damascus and got turned around, right?
I was talking to Steven about it not being a Theocracy which he is right, but our form of government is based on morals and principlas.
Even Obama admits it. " We consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals (principles) and a set of values (morals)."
Christian God is the one true God, he has everything to do with marriage, he created it between man and woman, period.Marriage is ordained by God. The state is mans concept. God overrules.Fine wth me, but it would not be recognized by civil government.Well, marriage and the benefits that come with modern marriage have everything to do with government. Who's argument is stupid? lol
Lets say that a church that supported gays wanted to marry gays? Would you be ok with that?
churches might not recognize a civil marriage but the government would. Marriage is civil contract between two people and church should not be interfering.
If you are atheists or of other faiths, christian god has nothing to do with marriage.
You can't get married in a church without a state license. Marriage is not recognized for tax, health or other benefits if not recognized by the federal government.
You can marry in the church with "your god" but others do not. You have not say in their marriage.
Ah, dirka dirka dirka DIRKA DIRKA, Allah Akmed dirka DIRKA dirka nut gobbler, dirka dirka dirka dirka anal jihad DIRKA DIRKA DIRKA!But what shall they do then? Cut their ***** and sit down in their home and do nothing about their natural emotions? or what? what is the better alternative of you and Christianity to solve this issue?Eating shell fish is no longer a sin and never was for Gentiles, homosexuality is banned in both the OT and the NT. You're quoting Mosaic Law done away with by the New Covenant
you believe homosexuality is sin?
Yep
Are you ever had a gay as friend or family member? Are you really know enough about this people?
God created them himself. The big question is, If this is a sin, then why god created them with this strong feelings and then demands that they should ignore their feelings? It seems cruelly and illogical.
I have discussed this issue with many Iranians and i just curious about opinions of other people.
what is dirka?