Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This stupid shit again?...It didn't fly the first time around. It wont now either. Shut it.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
Who said anything about government?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.So being pregnant makes you wrong, or a bad employee? Tell me more.
No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.
Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.This may sound cold but employers should be able to fire anyone and being pregnant shouldn't excuse the other reasons for firing. So are woman somehow so special that they shouldn't be fired???? Men get fired all the time for doing wrong or being a bad employee and in some cases they have to support a family too...
So being pregnant makes you wrong, or a bad employee? Tell me more.
No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.
Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This stupid shit again?...It didn't fly the first time around. It wont now either. Shut it.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
You people support Muslims. This is a misogynistic patriarchal religion that in it's very teachings, women are treated as mere chattel
Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.So being pregnant makes you wrong, or a bad employee? Tell me more.
No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.
Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
Shouldn't require a bill in the first place.Who said anything about government?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.
Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
It's a house bill that would allow employers to fire single pregnant women. The house is a big part of the government dummy.
Lots of companies have morals clauses, etc. If they realize that single mom families are bad for society then good for them for not endorsing them.Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.No,,,doing something fireable makes you wrong....Being pregnant shouldn't justify different treatment. Yes this is cold but I don't think a employer should have to treat someone different for any reason.
Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
It's based on republicans wanting to be able to fire women for nothing more than being single and pregnant. It has nothing to do with how well they do their job.
Conservative "men" only love women they can control.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
Conservative men love women. Your side is the queer brigade that hates women so much you want to marry men.
Lots of companies have morals clauses, etc. If they realize that single mom families are bad for society then good for them for not endorsing them.Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
It's based on republicans wanting to be able to fire women for nothing more than being single and pregnant. It has nothing to do with how well they do their job.
I'd say 1330'sBecause only women get to choose. That's the lefty way.Where is this war on woman????
Did you even read the OP? Can you even read? That is the war on women.........filing a bill that literally gives employers the right to fire pregnant single women is a war on women. Why not the men that got them pregnant? And, aren't they going against their own belief's? Won't this open the door for single women to want to get abortions? I thought you all were against abortion? And, won't this make single pregnant women qualify for welfare? I thought you all were against welfare? Isn't it a stupid decision? Hopefully there is enough Democrats to derail this bill.......but kudos to you all for winning the House and the Senate.....now you can wreck the country without interference. Well, maybe not, we still have a damn smart President......he'll veto the hell out of such stupidity.
Oh, and men get to choose to fire women that get pregnant and are not married....how quaint. That's like so 1930's......where you cons want to take the country.
Lots of companies have morals clauses, etc. If they realize that single mom families are bad for society then good for them for not endorsing them.Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.Did you even read the OP? They want to be able to fire women for being pregnant, but just the ones who aren't married. Do you really think an employer should have that ability?
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
It's based on republicans wanting to be able to fire women for nothing more than being single and pregnant. It has nothing to do with how well they do their job.
Like Bill Clinton.Conservative "men" only love women they can control.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
Conservative men love women. Your side is the queer brigade that hates women so much you want to marry men.
False l need do nothing but state the facts. All anyone needs to do is read your selfrightious shit to see I'm correct.You need to itemize your charge. Otherwise you're just a troll.Says the Lord of sheepleI live in a bubble all right. It's a bunch of white left wingers in the middle of a black county. They love talking about diversity and they all go gray. Gray sheeple.She dyes the gray out of her hair because she's very honest about her sexuality as opposed to lefty women who aren't and who dye their hair gray.There is no need for her to dye her hair she's barely legal.
You really do live in a bubble. Because some women dye their hair gray doesn't mean every one does. I don't need to dye my hair.....I don't have but a few gray hairs and it really adds highlights to my dark brown hair. Many women dye their hair ash blond......which looks gray, and I know some Republican women that do that. What has that got to do with the stupid filing of a bill by the GOP that literally gives employers the right to fire a woman for getting pregnant out of wedlock?
When you say you want to take the country back.....does it mean to the dark ages? It appears so.
You ever run or watch a 3200 meter race? You have to cross a place you've already been eight times. Lefties don't realize they've been lapped and then some.I'd say 1330'sBecause only women get to choose. That's the lefty way.Where is this war on woman????
Did you even read the OP? Can you even read? That is the war on women.........filing a bill that literally gives employers the right to fire pregnant single women is a war on women. Why not the men that got them pregnant? And, aren't they going against their own belief's? Won't this open the door for single women to want to get abortions? I thought you all were against abortion? And, won't this make single pregnant women qualify for welfare? I thought you all were against welfare? Isn't it a stupid decision? Hopefully there is enough Democrats to derail this bill.......but kudos to you all for winning the House and the Senate.....now you can wreck the country without interference. Well, maybe not, we still have a damn smart President......he'll veto the hell out of such stupidity.
Oh, and men get to choose to fire women that get pregnant and are not married....how quaint. That's like so 1930's......where you cons want to take the country.
FalseLike Bill Clinton.Conservative "men" only love women they can control.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
Conservative men love women. Your side is the queer brigade that hates women so much you want to marry men.
If the clause says the employer has the right to terminate single mothers then there you go. This is a very simple issue.Lots of companies have morals clauses, etc. If they realize that single mom families are bad for society then good for them for not endorsing them.Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
It's based on republicans wanting to be able to fire women for nothing more than being single and pregnant. It has nothing to do with how well they do their job.
If they signed a morals clause, they are governed by the terms of that clause. This has nothing to do with morals clauses.
Absolute bullshit.Lots of companies have morals clauses, etc. If they realize that single mom families are bad for society then good for them for not endorsing them.Hey there Dawg…. wassaup?Sure. If they intentionally create children devoid of the necessary two parents then they are contributing to social demise. Like if they sell drugs. Good policy.
Does that mean you want government to poke it's nose in people's most personal decisions? Don't answer that. I already know.
This whole thing assumes that people are entitled to the job working for somebody else. As soon as they get hired, they are entitled to the job. Is this the premise the whole argument is based on?
It's based on republicans wanting to be able to fire women for nothing more than being single and pregnant. It has nothing to do with how well they do their job.
One of the main arguments the left uses for black failure is that black children are economically disadvantaged. Why? Mostly because most black families are single mom. A strong father/mother family is always best but somehow the left see's that as evil.
You just repeated more pointless troll shit. List your concerns. Can't have a discussion if you can't make a point.False l need do nothing but state the facts. All anyone needs to do is read your selfrightious shit to see I'm correct.You need to itemize your charge. Otherwise you're just a troll.Says the Lord of sheepleI live in a bubble all right. It's a bunch of white left wingers in the middle of a black county. They love talking about diversity and they all go gray. Gray sheeple.She dyes the gray out of her hair because she's very honest about her sexuality as opposed to lefty women who aren't and who dye their hair gray.
You really do live in a bubble. Because some women dye their hair gray doesn't mean every one does. I don't need to dye my hair.....I don't have but a few gray hairs and it really adds highlights to my dark brown hair. Many women dye their hair ash blond......which looks gray, and I know some Republican women that do that. What has that got to do with the stupid filing of a bill by the GOP that literally gives employers the right to fire a woman for getting pregnant out of wedlock?
When you say you want to take the country back.....does it mean to the dark ages? It appears so.
Clinton didn't use his power to control women? I thought that was established in the investigation and hearing.FalseLike Bill Clinton.Conservative "men" only love women they can control.Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
Conservative men love women. Your side is the queer brigade that hates women so much you want to marry men.
Republicans deny the claim that there is a Republican's war on women......but they keep taking actions that prove they hate women. Filing a bill that allows employers to fire single women that get pregnant! What about the men that got them pregnant? And, won't this encourage abortions? Welfare? What are they thinking? Oops, they are not thinking.
Where are the Republican women on this? Why do they think it is okay? Stepford wives, anyone?
Well, it’s happened. Republicans have become so desperate in their attempts to allow bigots to discriminate freely against the LGBT community that they have crafted a bill with language so loose that would allow “Christians” to fire single women for getting pregnant…just like Jesus would. H.R. 2802, or the First Amendment Defense Act, “prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person — which is defined to include for-profit corporations — acting in accordance with a religious belief that favors so-called traditional marriage,” the Huffington Post reports. “This means the feds can’t revoke a nonprofit’s tax-exempt status or end a company’s federal contract over this issue.”
The bill includes protections for people who believe marriage is between “one man and one woman” and “sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.” If that’s not awful enough, American Civil Liberties Union legislative representative Ian Thompson points out that the legalized discrimination within the bill extends to other groups conservatives regularly attempt to deprive of equal treatment — single mothers.
House GOP Files Bill That Allows Employers To Fire Single Pregnant Women
