Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yea because the states would have abolished slavery, Jim Crow, given everyone the right to vote. Oh my bad I was in fantasyland for a moment.The sky is falling the sky is falling!!! They are taking powers away from the Federal government it never should have had!!! Oh noooooooos!!
If Roe is overturned, the congress can pass federal law establishing national and rational standards for abortion. That’s what should have been done in the first place rather than legislating from the bench. Congress and the president will have nearly a year to accomplish this and until the mid-terms, the Democrats control both houses of the congress and the White House. If they have the will they can do it the right way; by legislation.
Nobody has an issue with interracial marriage. There is no way interracial marriage could ever be touched. There is nothing at all wrong with it.
Let’s avoid the problem completely.The Holocaust occurred with legal protections.
True.
Conservatives will also attack the rights of gay and transgender Americans, seek to allow the states to ban same-sex marriage, seek to allow the states to again criminalize being gay and transgender.
We’ll see the balkanization of our rights and protected liberties – indeed, our liberties will no longer be protected, one’s rights will be contingent upon his state of residence, where those in Republican-controlled states will have their rights in constant jeopardy, subject to the capricious whims of partisan politics, no longer safeguarded by the Constitution and rule of law.
Here we go.
Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade, leaked draft opinion shows: report
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe v. Wade, according to an unprecedented leak of a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico.www.foxnews.com
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,
I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
Supreme Court set to overturn Roe v. Wade, leaked draft opinion shows: report
The Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe v. Wade, according to an unprecedented leak of a draft opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico.
"We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Samuel Alito writes in the document,
I say that we hold that the Supreme Court is no longer legitimate. The Democrats need to RISE UP and start civil war to protect women and their right to privacy. This is unbelievable to see 5 people try and change 50 years of precedent. This will destroy the COUNTRY.
"It's not fair! Mom said it was the left's turn to be authoritarian and opppressive!"Correct.
Now that the Supreme Court has abandoned its role and responsibility as the means by which citizens can seek relief from rightwing authoritarianism and oppression, Americans will need to use the political process to defend their rights and protected liberties from attack by conservatives.
But you're okay with that when it's Muslim countries....seek to allow the states to again criminalize being gay and transgender.
Conservatives have no obligation to validate your hyper-emotional fear-mongering.Of course conservatives were lying – that’s all dishonest conservatives do.
And conservatives are lying now with they claim they won’t attack other rights and protected liberties.
Nobody tells you how to sit in your shithole country and draw dole checks.This is what you get when yu elect a liar and then h appoints liars.
The Supreme Court is broken and Biden needs to deal with the fact that liars sit there in very important roles making decisions on narrow political lines.
What that should look likeus probably a bigger court to nullify the liars influence.
How about people just stop having unprotected sex with pieces of shit?
OP is correct.“Republican senators are giving us a glimpse of the culture war clashes to come. There are already warning signs — including the Texas directive that prohibits parents from legally providing gender-affirming treatment and therapies to their children, as well as various state officials’ questioning whether the Constitution sanctions contraceptive use. Indeed, some Republican senators have gestured toward these future conflicts. In his questions to Jackson, Sen. John Cornyn (R-Tex.) repeatedly sought her views of Obergefell v. Hodges, the court’s 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage, pressing her as to whether the decision was properly decided. Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) took her turn at the microphone to criticize Griswold v. Connecticut, the 1965 case that legalized contraception use. It’s not a stretch to imagine this revisionism extending to Loving v. Virginia, the ruling that legalized interracial marriage. A Republican senator recently said he was open to overturning that ruling. He later walked back his comments.
All this underscores that abortion was never the conservatives’ endgame. It is merely a way station on the path to rolling back a wide range of rights — the rights that scaffold the most intimate aspects of our lives and protect the liberty and equality of marginalized groups.”
Republicans’ assault on citizens’ rights and protected liberties has just begun.
‘Justices who comprise the conservative majority on the Supreme Court have long been hostile to the right to privacy that was articulated in Griswold v. Connecticut, which protects the right to use contraception. Strict textualist justices claim the word “privacy” is not in the Constitution and thus the right to privacy does not exist.Link?
No one made such a claim
YOU are lying
www.vox.com
‘Lawrence v. Texas, a 2003 decision decriminalizing same-sex sodomy; Obergefell v. Hodges, a 2015 decision legalizing same-sex marriage; Griswold v. Connecticut, a 1965 decision that legalized contraceptive use; and Loving v. Virginia, the 1967 decision legalizing interracial marriage.Link?
No one made such a claim
YOU are lying
You might be interesting to talk to if you'd stop drama-queening for two minutes in a row.‘Justices who comprise the conservative majority on the Supreme Court have long been hostile to the right to privacy that was articulated in Griswold v. Connecticut, which protects the right to use contraception. Strict textualist justices claim the word “privacy” is not in the Constitution and thus the right to privacy does not exist.
This is the same rhetorical move that Justice Alito makes in his leaked opinion overturning Roe v. Wade. He claims that because the word “abortion” is not in the Constitution ... consequently the right to abortion does not exist.
The problem for our modern society is that many rights we care about have been protected as progeny of Griswold. This decision also gave us Loving v. Virginia, which invalidated an anti-miscegenation law, as well as Windsor and Obergefell, which articulated a right to marriage equality for same-sex couples.
After this [opinion], Loving, Windsor, and Obergefell are all on constitutionally thin ice. And the frustrating thing is Justice Alito’s ignoring the Ninth Amendment, which protects Americans’ unenumerated rights. As Roe recognized 49 years ago, the right to abortion is protected by the Ninth Amendment.
Or at least it did until this opinion becomes the law of the land.'
After Roe: 9 legal experts on what rights the Supreme Court might target next
Does Justice Alito’s draft opinion hint at future rollbacks on marriage equality, birth control, and other issues?
Pursuant to this extremist, wrongheaded rightwing judicial dogma, conservatives will continue their attack on the rights and civil liberties of the American people, allowing government to interfere in all manner of personal, private matters clearly not within the purview of the state.
