Restaurant die-off is first course of California’s $15 minimum wage

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is all you have. The left is working on, fullsense.

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

He doesn't speak English, he speaks stoner.

 

[Papageorgio]

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

He doesn't speak English, he speaks stoner.

I think he was dropped on his head when he was a kid.

 

[Ame®icano]

Yeah, sole reason that business exists is to support people needs.

"Livable wage"... LOL.

I need around $150K annually. Are you ready to pay that up?

A livable wage is a salary that allows to eat and pay rent without government assistance or force to get a second job.

$8.25 doesn't allow for that.

I agree, it doesn't allow if you eat steaks or baby back ribs every day.

If you want to eat that anyways, you need be able to get career job that pays more.

Anyways, what's wrong with getting a second job?

Not always convenient.

Neither is having kids that you have to feed and clothe, but we do it anyways.

ok. some people advocate for equal protection of the law. money is not every thing.

What equal protection of the law has to do with what we discussing here?

 

[Ame®icano]

You know you could just get illegal Mexicans to do it, if you want it cheap. Then there'd be lots more food places. But for some reason you have a problem with Mexicans working illegally, but you don't have a problem with Americans working for too little money. Hmmm.

Boot 10 million illegal aliens, low skill Americans would earn more.

You new to our New World economy?

America has near record 5.8 million job openings

You need New World excuses not Old World excuses.

5.8 million job openings.

Why do we have so many on unemployment, welfare and food stamps?

The number on unemployment compensation is the lowest it has been since the 1970's. Most of the people on welfare and food stamps are working in crappy jobs that don't pay enough to feed a family. There is no shortage of jobs. We have plenty of crappy jobs. We just need jobs that pay s decent wage.

You new to our New World economy?

America has near record 5.8 million job openings

You need New World excuses not Old World excuses.

If we have so many job openings, and with official unemployment rate of 4.6%, why number of unemployed is still the same, around 90 million?

 

[Ame®icano]

You got no clue what "right to work" means.

Yes, I do. It is Congress that needs laws regarding, Truth in Legislative Advertising.

It doesn't mean what you think it means.

I know what, right to work, means; I also know, that is not what the legislative intent means.

By reading your gems, one after another, I don't think you do.

"Right to Work" means something. Legislation does not necessarily mean the same as those terms. Do we need, "Truth in legislative advertising" laws?

It means "something". LOL

You got no clue what "right to work" is.

 

[Ame®icano]

Not the problem,

All those illegals competing for the same jobs sure isn't the solution for low skilled Americans.

So you have just admitted that illegal aliens work, good for you,

And now they need to go back home and work there.

Except the US is intent on making sure there aren't any jobs for them there.

Except the US is intent on making sure there aren't any jobs for them there.

The US is supposed to make sure there are jobs for them in their home country?

Damn, that's hilarious!

Let's try explaining this in a way you should be able to grasp.

Ever heard of the Marshall Plan? Post WW2 and many countries were in serious need of rebuilding. The US helped certain allies to rebuild, like Japan, who had been an enemy, and the Japanese came strongly to the forefront of the Cold War in the Pacific. West Germany was also very strong along with France, they were staunch allies in the Cold War. They benefited the US greatly, it was money well spent for the US.

At the end of the Cold War the US again helped countries that had formerly been their enemies. Many Warsaw Pact countries, but not Russia. America still feared the power of Russia. So, during the 1990s while many Warsaw Pact countries were doing well, Russia wasn't. So Russia then went and elected Putin who has been a thorn in the side of America ever since. Had the US helped Russia, showed the Russians that democracy can work, then maybe someone like Putin wouldn't have found it easy to come to the fore in politics. But it didn't work like that.

For Mexico there seem to be a few problems, crime and drugs, and illegal workers. Neither of these are a problem for the US-Canadian border. There's no call for a wall on the US-Canadian border.

Canada has a GDP of $46,000 per capita, Mexico has $19,000 per capita.

The border is going to cost Americans billions of dollars all because of this. If Mexico has jobs, and Mexico increases its GDP then it's more able to fight the drugs and the crime, saving the US money, and the border will be less crossed, saving the US money.

Got it?

What a load of crap.

How many jobs left US for Mexico since NAFTA and how much that really help them?

Mexico GDP before NAFTA was cca $8000 per capita and today is around $9500 per capita. LINK
Counting inflation, nothing has changed. Except, we're hurting, since nice chunk of our production moved south.

By the way, some of the former Warshaw Pact countries are doing much better, not because of "our money" but because they got rid of communism, take Poland, Slovakia, Hungary. The others, with the same communist mindset as during the Pact, are still shitholes, take Romania, Bulgaria, Albania. They're doing bit better, only due to the charity money from EU.

Mexico is our third largest trading partner; but the right wing prefers to blame poor Mexicans for expatriating money, instead of the rich, who do it for tax evasion.

Great, lets stop building stuff there and bring it back here.

 

[Mr Natural]

Great, lets stop building stuff there and bring it back here.

Sorry, but greedy American workers want too much for their time and labor.

 

[Ame®icano]

Try to quit and collect unemployment in any at-will employment State in our Union.

Have you tried?

Why not jail employers who don't hire everybody that applies, in right to work States.

Because that would be nonsense.

Equal protection of the law, and National Thong Day, right wingers!

Nonsense.

It is all you have. The left is working on, fullsense.

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Just a clarification, posting on a message board for $0.02 per post is not a job. Neither is playing LOL and COD.

 

[Ame®icano]

Equal protection of the law, and National Thong Day, right wingers!

Nonsense.

It is all you have. The left is working on, fullsense.

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Get a job? It's easier to freeload and envy what others have.

 

[baileyn45]

Maybe they should not pass the wage increase on to the consumer. Sooner or later these business owners need to take the hit.

Kill the greedy kulaks, eh comrade?

No , just let them pay a decent wage. If they can't run a efficient restaurant they should close.

I find that attitude almost sickening. Think about it, you have a restaurant that's hanging in there, no one getting rich but everyone making a living. Enter the govt. Everyone loses their job. Watch the leftists celebrate.

So you want slave labor. Great, the truth is now known. Bad management, close the door.

Bad management? A 43% increase in labor costs? Do yourself a favor don't go into business, you'd last about 2 minutes.

 

[danielpalos]

Yes, I do. It is Congress that needs laws regarding, Truth in Legislative Advertising.

It doesn't mean what you think it means.

I know what, right to work, means; I also know, that is not what the legislative intent means.

By reading your gems, one after another, I don't think you do.

"Right to Work" means something. Legislation does not necessarily mean the same as those terms. Do we need, "Truth in legislative advertising" laws?

"Right to Work" means something.

Explain what it means.
Include links to relevant laws/regulations.
Thanks!

Right to work, right to keep and bear Arms; ring a bell, right wingers.

 

[danielpalos]

Only lousy capitalists makes excuses instead of try to understand the potential Contract.

Forcing firms to hire moron slackers like you is the best way to harm the economy.

Only lousy capitalists, say that.

Economics....lib morons just don't get it.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; only the right complains about a lack of capital opportunities; but blame the poor.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages

Why?

He was a Good capitalist, unlike the whiners on the right wing.

 

[danielpalos]

It is all you have. The left is working on, fullsense.

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

Why should Labor as the least wealthy in our Republic, be denied and disparaged equal protection of the law for the purposes of employment at will?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

He doesn't speak English, he speaks stoner.

I think he was dropped on his head when he was a kid.

He's still being dropped on his head.

 

[danielpalos]

That Only happens to lousy capitalists. Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages, not minimum wages, because he had a plan to achieve gains from efficiency; unlike the right wing.

No stupid, business models vary and Ford's business model then may not work today and in many places it doesn't.

Please learn before you post stupidity.

Only lousy Capitalists, say that, according to Herr Say.

No only stupid idiots like yourself post stupid nonsense that can't possibly fit every business model. You notice I don't accuse you of being left or right wing. Calling you either is an insult to the left or the right. Let me know when you have ran a successful business and get back to me on your silly comment.

Herr Say, says you don't know what you are talking about because you are full of fallacy.

Again, please apply your "Ford" theory to the fast food industry and tell be how that will work. Remembering that Ford needed specialized workers and training. Then explain why you don't own a business that practices what you preach.

Increasing the cost of labor requires capital to seek gains from efficiency; Henry Ford was, proactive, that was his, competitive advantage.

 

[danielpalos]

Keep working on it, because you're not doing a great job yet. Put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

He doesn't speak English, he speaks stoner.

With nothing but fallacies; even Uncensored2008 is more cogent; while communicating in Anglo-Saxon.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It doesn't mean what you think it means.

I know what, right to work, means; I also know, that is not what the legislative intent means.

By reading your gems, one after another, I don't think you do.

"Right to Work" means something. Legislation does not necessarily mean the same as those terms. Do we need, "Truth in legislative advertising" laws?

"Right to Work" means something.

Explain what it means.
Include links to relevant laws/regulations.
Thanks!

Right to work, right to keep and bear Arms; ring a bell, right wingers.

Explain what it means.
Include links to relevant laws/regulations.
Thanks!

 

[danielpalos]

Fallacy is all the right wing has; it is not very difficult to compete; no wonder y'all think I am a lousy socialist.

Oh, no, you're a great socialist, just not good at communicating coherent thoughts. Like I've advised you multiple times, put the bong down, get out of your mom's basement, and get a job.

y'all having nothing but fallacy, used to annoy me. Now, I know that means I am "winning".

That might be valid if I were posting fallacies. I am not. You are terrible at communicating coherent thoughts, at least in English.

He doesn't speak English, he speaks stoner.

I think he was dropped on his head when he was a kid.

I also smoke pot and don't make excuses; unlike the "dopeless wonders" on the "fantastical" right wing.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Forcing firms to hire moron slackers like you is the best way to harm the economy.

Only lousy capitalists, say that.

Economics....lib morons just don't get it.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages not minimum wages; only the right complains about a lack of capital opportunities; but blame the poor.

Henry Ford doubled autoworker wages

Why?

He was a Good capitalist, unlike the whiners on the right wing.

He was a Good capitalist

Why does doubling wages make him a good capitalist?

 

[danielpalos]

I know what, right to work, means; I also know, that is not what the legislative intent means.

By reading your gems, one after another, I don't think you do.

"Right to Work" means something. Legislation does not necessarily mean the same as those terms. Do we need, "Truth in legislative advertising" laws?

"Right to Work" means something.

Explain what it means.
Include links to relevant laws/regulations.
Thanks!

Right to work, right to keep and bear Arms; ring a bell, right wingers.

Explain what it means.
Include links to relevant laws/regulations.
Thanks!

Right equals right, right, right wingers?