rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 285,199
- 157,986
That is a very interesting pointI don't understand the OP
Nobody was killed but he is not satisfied unless there is a shootout
He thinks people are only safe with a gun. When he sees people are safe without guns he gets mad. He is only interested in selling more guns.
He just won't accept....give them the freaking money and send them on their way
Cameras stop more crime than our 300 million guns
Except for the motel clerk...who gave them the money...and they shot him anyway....or the bank President...woken up at 3 a.m. by three men in masks, make him open his bank vault then duct taped him to a chair and a cinder block and drowned him in a river....that case was highlighted on "The New Detectives" or Forensic Files.....then there was the nurse.....raped by two teens in her own car.....they thought she might have heard one of their names...and after the rape put her in her own car trunk and drove it into a river....it took her at least 5 minutes to die....that is what the coroner said..........
You can always cherry pick incidents....but they don't make your point
I'll tell you what. Take 100 robberies
I will just give them the money and even offer an order of fries to go
You arm the waiters and all the patrons. We will see who ends up with more dead bodies
The first year our side will have a lot of dead bodies. Then the second year there will be none, and there will be a further benefit to the rest of society in that those perps will be dead so unable to harm others not in the restaurants.
Why is it you anti gun people are so uninformed and think so one dimensionally?
Thanks for posting