Rick Perry - Handicapping the GOP Hopefuls

[Statistikhengst]

Do you speak unga bunga, really?

 

[martybegan]

As long as you refuse to do business with Mormons, you are as big of a hypocrite.

Not really. Gays don't choose to be gay. Mormons not only choose to be Mormons, but they actually have to actively ignore evidence that Joseph Smith was a lying sack of crap who just wanted to fuck little girls.

There is a whole branch of Radical Feminism that disagrees with you on that.

 

[JoeB131]

I asked for specifics, you gave me the standard Bush bad unga bunga.

figures.

You mean other than appointing Cronies to the SEC who were watching porn instead of the banks?

 

[JoeB131]

Do you speak unga bunga, really?

It's his native language.

 

[JoeB131]

As long as you refuse to do business with Mormons, you are as big of a hypocrite.

Not really. Gays don't choose to be gay. Mormons not only choose to be Mormons, but they actually have to actively ignore evidence that Joseph Smith was a lying sack of crap who just wanted to fuck little girls.

There is a whole branch of Radical Feminism that disagrees with you on that.

Radical Feminists? DO they even still make those?

 

[martybegan]

I asked for specifics, you gave me the standard Bush bad unga bunga.

figures.

You mean other than appointing Cronies to the SEC who were watching porn instead of the banks?

My 401k is just fine, don't know what happened to yours.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Do you speak unga bunga, really?

It's his native language.

Aha. Is that a series of unitelligible grunts and wheezes and such?

 

[martybegan]

As long as you refuse to do business with Mormons, you are as big of a hypocrite.

Not really. Gays don't choose to be gay. Mormons not only choose to be Mormons, but they actually have to actively ignore evidence that Joseph Smith was a lying sack of crap who just wanted to fuck little girls.

There is a whole branch of Radical Feminism that disagrees with you on that.

Radical Feminists? DO they even still make those?

Just look under the cover of SJW's.

 

[martybegan]

Do you speak unga bunga, really?

your point?

 

[JoeB131]

It was probably closer than expected because Obama fucked up the first debate and lost probably 2% right there. But polling had him consistently over 300 EV for more than one year on end.

EV's are misleading. a small shift in a few states would have swung it.

The fact that Romney came as close as he did, because no one really challenged his crazy beliefs, is truly frightening.

 

[Toro]

Because regardless of one's race, religion or sexuality, you treat and judge people as individuals, not ascribing negative aspects based on a pre-determined bias, which is what you do.

That's why you are a bigot.

But as long as you're not a conservative, you'll have some spineless leftist who'll support you no matter what. So, there's that.

Sorry, guy, I don't put religion in the same class as race, gender and sexual orientation. Religion, you have to make a special effort to continue to believe in utter nonsense about sky pixies. And Mormonism I put in it's own special class, because it's a fucking scam, the scam was documented, and Mormons make a special effort to ignore the fact it's a scam.

But do you know what really makes me hate the fuck out of Mormons? The fact that when you decide as a young Mormon that Joseph Smith was full of shit, your family is required to SHUN you. That makes them especially contemptable.

That YOU don't put religion in there is to be expected, so that is how you rationalize your bigotry. Nazis thought they were doing the world a favor by exterminating the Jews. No doubt, if a few black people screwed you over, you'd hate all black people too.

You throw everyone from a group in the same boat if a few people made you mad.

That's why you are a bigot.

 

[JoeB131]

I asked for specifics, you gave me the standard Bush bad unga bunga.

figures.

You mean other than appointing Cronies to the SEC who were watching porn instead of the banks?

My 401k is just fine, don't know what happened to yours.

It lost 50% of its value in 2008. SOme of it came back under Obama (Not that you'd give him credit for that. YOu know, because he's black.)

 

[martybegan]

I asked for specifics, you gave me the standard Bush bad unga bunga.

figures.

You mean other than appointing Cronies to the SEC who were watching porn instead of the banks?

My 401k is just fine, don't know what happened to yours.

It lost 50% of its value in 2008. SOme of it came back under Obama (Not that you'd give him credit for that. YOu know, because he's black.)

1) how old were you. If under 40 losing 1/2 its value is a transient, and means you buy shares at a lower value while it recovers.
2) If you were older, you should have had more in bonds and MM's, not stock funds.

 

[JoeB131]

That YOU don't put religion in there is to be expected, so that is how you rationalize your bigotry. Nazis thought they were doing the world a favor by exterminating the Jews. No doubt, if a few black people screwed you over, you'd hate all black people too.

You throw everyone from a group in the same boat if a few people made you mad.

That's why you are a bigot.

well, no, guy, Mormons aren't Jews or Blacks.

Mormons also think black skin is a curse from God, but I don't see you calling their religion on that. Or that they didn't let black folks join until 1978.

 

[Statistikhengst]

It was probably closer than expected because Obama fucked up the first debate and lost probably 2% right there. But polling had him consistently over 300 EV for more than one year on end.

EV's are misleading. a small shift in a few states would have swung it.

The fact that Romney came as close as he did, because no one really challenged his crazy beliefs, is truly frightening.

No, false.

Even if the vote had shifted to Romney in all states that Obama won with less than +5, he would still have won with 272 EV. Any state with more than +5 means that a considerable shift in voting would have been necessary. That stats prove you wrong in this case. Obama won FL, OH and VA with less than +5. 332-29-18-13=272.

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/...1&off=0&year=2012&sort_dir=desc&submit=Submit

Compare that with 2004:

http://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/...1&off=0&year=2004&sort_dir=desc&submit=Submit

Had Bush 43 lost the states that he won with less than +5, using exactly the same criteria as I used for Obama 2012, the Bush would have lost CO (9 EV), NV (5 EV), OH (20 EV), NM (5 EV), and IA (7 EV) and ended up with 240 EV.


In order to get an Obama loss, you would have to swing at least one state that he won with over +5. That is statistically not even a battleground statistic, +5 and above. Just to be clear.

 

[JoeB131]

1) how old were you. If under 40 losing 1/2 its value is a transient, and means you buy shares at a lower value while it recovers.
2) If you were older, you should have had more in bonds and MM's, not stock funds.

Guy, I shouldn't have to be an expert on the Stock Market to not get screwed. 401K is the biggest scam every pulled off on working folks.

 

[JoeB131]

No, false.

Even if the vote had shifted to Romney in all states that Obama won with less than +5, he would still have won with 272 EV.

Guy, I'm not going to rehash the election with you. Point is, Romney came way too close to winning, given how absolutely scary his cult is.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Bigot.

But hey, don't worry, Dot Com supports you! That's the advent of the spineless left.

The one time I made the mistake of trusting Mormons, I paid a very steep price for it.

What compelling reason would I have to ever trust one again?

Because regardless of one's race, religion or sexuality, you treat and judge people as individuals, not ascribing negative aspects based on a pre-determined bias, which is what you do.

That's why you are a bigot.

But as long as you're not a conservative, you'll have some spineless leftist who'll support you no matter what. So, there's that.

Well, my spine is in good shape. And I am mostly from the Left. But I support no-one's bigotry.

 

[Statistikhengst]

No, false.

Even if the vote had shifted to Romney in all states that Obama won with less than +5, he would still have won with 272 EV.

Guy, I'm not going to rehash the election with you. Point is, Romney came way too close to winning, given how absolutely scary his cult is.

Statistically, no, he didn't. +4 is not as close as people think. Obama's win in 2012 is still considerably LARGER than Bush 2004, Gore 2000 (in the PV), Carter 1976, Nixon 1968, Kennedy 1960. The only relatively close election in the 20th century when the winner did better in the margin was Truman 1948.

 

[rightwinger]

Damn...has this thread ever turned into a pissing contest