Right vs. Left is Logic vs. Emotion

[JonKoch]

Air pollution and climate change are closely related. The main sources of CO2 emissions – the extraction and burning of fossil fuels – are not only key drivers of climate change, but also major sources of air pollutants. Furthermore, many air pollutants that are harmful to human health and ecosystems also contribute to climate change by affecting the amount of incoming sunlight that is reflected or absorbed by the atmosphere, with some pollutants warming and others cooling the Earth. These so-called short-lived climate-forcing pollutants (SLCPs) include methane, black carbon, ground-level ozone, and sulfate aerosols. They have significant impacts on the climate; black carbon and methane in particular are among the top contributors to global warming after CO2.

Air Pollution and Climate Change | IASS Potsdam

What about volcanoes?

What about them? China has tons of pollution, haven't heard about any volcanoes. Hawaii has volcanoes.

Volcanoes put more pollution in the atmosphere than mankind does... you better go stop those volcanoes

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

How long has the industrial age been around? How long have volcanoes been spewing pollutants into the air?

Once more cupcake:

"Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

 

[JonKoch]

An obvious answer to that is because Americans most wealthy vote Republican, as that's who the GOP caters to.

/---- There's not enough wealthy to put Republicans in office . Sorry snowflakes but it's the working class the Dems ignore that put them in office

What an ignorant statement cupcake

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority



Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


...And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.



In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/08/28/study-citizens-united-elected-more-republicans/?utm_term=.7c61979d4351

/---- Senate Dems may have gotten more votes because they came from Blue States with larger populations. That proves nothing. Here's some facts Spanky:
In Eight Years Barack Obama Has Obliterated the Democrat Party in ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../eight-years-barack-obama-obliterated-democrat-party...
Nov 9, 2016 - In 2009 Democrats held 60 seats in the US Senate. ... Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 .... Many of those precious little snowflakes have never had to work a job in their life, parents ...
Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama | Fox News
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/.../democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.ht...
Dec 27, 2016 - The Democratic Party suffered huge losses at every level during Obama’s West Wing tenure. The grand total: a net loss of 1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency. ... Democratic U.S. Senate seats ...

Yes ignore the Cit United study as well as GOP gerrymandering memo cupcake. Typical righttard

Excuses excuses excuses

Socialism never has and never will make anyone's life better, but you can choose if you want. Just leave the rest of us out of it

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

 

[Rustic]

What about volcanoes?

What about them? China has tons of pollution, haven't heard about any volcanoes. Hawaii has volcanoes.

Volcanoes put more pollution in the atmosphere than mankind does... you better go stop those volcanoes

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

How long has the industrial age been around? How long have volcanoes been spewing pollutants into the air?

Once more cupcake:

"Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

Na, bad source.
So called "climate change" is a natural occurrence...

 

[Rustic]

/---- There's not enough wealthy to put Republicans in office . Sorry snowflakes but it's the working class the Dems ignore that put them in office

What an ignorant statement cupcake

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority



Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


...And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.



In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/08/28/study-citizens-united-elected-more-republicans/?utm_term=.7c61979d4351

/---- Senate Dems may have gotten more votes because they came from Blue States with larger populations. That proves nothing. Here's some facts Spanky:
In Eight Years Barack Obama Has Obliterated the Democrat Party in ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../eight-years-barack-obama-obliterated-democrat-party...
Nov 9, 2016 - In 2009 Democrats held 60 seats in the US Senate. ... Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 .... Many of those precious little snowflakes have never had to work a job in their life, parents ...
Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama | Fox News
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/.../democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.ht...
Dec 27, 2016 - The Democratic Party suffered huge losses at every level during Obama’s West Wing tenure. The grand total: a net loss of 1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency. ... Democratic U.S. Senate seats ...

Yes ignore the Cit United study as well as GOP gerrymandering memo cupcake. Typical righttard

Excuses excuses excuses

Socialism never has and never will make anyone's life better, but you can choose if you want. Just leave the rest of us out of it

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Na, but it is the reason this country is in so much debt… Socialism never can pay its own bills

 

[Rustic]

What about them? China has tons of pollution, haven't heard about any volcanoes. Hawaii has volcanoes.

Volcanoes put more pollution in the atmosphere than mankind does... you better go stop those volcanoes

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

How long has the industrial age been around? How long have volcanoes been spewing pollutants into the air?

Once more cupcake:

"Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

Na, bad source.
So called "climate change" is a natural occurrence...

You better check your site again, that site is up al gores butt eating dingleberries...

 

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

 

[JonKoch]

What about them? China has tons of pollution, haven't heard about any volcanoes. Hawaii has volcanoes.

Volcanoes put more pollution in the atmosphere than mankind does... you better go stop those volcanoes

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

How long has the industrial age been around? How long have volcanoes been spewing pollutants into the air?

Once more cupcake:

"Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

Na, bad source.
So called "climate change" is a natural occurrence...

LMAOROG

 

[Rustic]

Volcanoes put more pollution in the atmosphere than mankind does... you better go stop those volcanoes

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

How long has the industrial age been around? How long have volcanoes been spewing pollutants into the air?

Once more cupcake:

"Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors."
Are Volcanoes or Humans Harder on the Atmosphere?

Na, bad source.
So called "climate change" is a natural occurrence...

LMAOROG

 

[JonKoch]

What an ignorant statement cupcake

Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

We're the popular party: Senate Democrats won over 23 million more votes than Republicans

It's official: Clinton swamps Trump in popular vote
http://www.cnn.com/2016/12/21/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-popular-vote-final-count/


GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority
GOP Memo: Gerrymandering Won Us The House Majority



Study: Citizens United elected more Republicans


...And in six of the most affected states — Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, North Carolina, Ohio and Tennessee — the probability that a Republican would be elected to a state legislative seat increased by 10 percentage points or more.



In five other states — Colorado, Iowa, Texas, Wisconsin and Wyoming — Republican candidates were seven percentage points more likely to win.

WAPO
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/govbeat/wp/2014/08/28/study-citizens-united-elected-more-republicans/?utm_term=.7c61979d4351

/---- Senate Dems may have gotten more votes because they came from Blue States with larger populations. That proves nothing. Here's some facts Spanky:
In Eight Years Barack Obama Has Obliterated the Democrat Party in ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../eight-years-barack-obama-obliterated-democrat-party...
Nov 9, 2016 - In 2009 Democrats held 60 seats in the US Senate. ... Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 .... Many of those precious little snowflakes have never had to work a job in their life, parents ...
Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama | Fox News
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/.../democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.ht...
Dec 27, 2016 - The Democratic Party suffered huge losses at every level during Obama’s West Wing tenure. The grand total: a net loss of 1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency. ... Democratic U.S. Senate seats ...

Yes ignore the Cit United study as well as GOP gerrymandering memo cupcake. Typical righttard

Excuses excuses excuses

Socialism never has and never will make anyone's life better, but you can choose if you want. Just leave the rest of us out of it

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Na, but it is the reason this country is in so much debt… Socialism never can pay its own bills

True NOT when you GUT those "job creators" taxes Cupcake

...In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income.


WAPO

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

 

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

/---- Senate Dems may have gotten more votes because they came from Blue States with larger populations. That proves nothing. Here's some facts Spanky:
In Eight Years Barack Obama Has Obliterated the Democrat Party in ...
www.thegatewaypundit.com/.../eight-years-barack-obama-obliterated-democrat-party...
Nov 9, 2016 - In 2009 Democrats held 60 seats in the US Senate. ... Under President Obama, Democrats have lost 900+ state legislature seats, 12 .... Many of those precious little snowflakes have never had to work a job in their life, parents ...
Democrats lost over 1,000 seats under Obama | Fox News
www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/12/.../democrats-lost-over-1000-seats-under-obama.ht...
Dec 27, 2016 - The Democratic Party suffered huge losses at every level during Obama’s West Wing tenure. The grand total: a net loss of 1,042 state and federal Democratic posts, including congressional and state legislative seats, governorships and the presidency. ... Democratic U.S. Senate seats ...

Yes ignore the Cit United study as well as GOP gerrymandering memo cupcake. Typical righttard

Excuses excuses excuses

Socialism never has and never will make anyone's life better, but you can choose if you want. Just leave the rest of us out of it

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Na, but it is the reason this country is in so much debt… Socialism never can pay its own bills

True NOT when you GUT those "job creators" taxes Cupcake

...In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income.


WAPO

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

Who gives a shit what people make or how little they make... everyone should pay the same dollar amount in taxes… Because any type of progressive tax is taxation without representation

 

[P@triot]

The Bush recession was the worst in 80 years. Housing collapse, Massive debt. two quagmire wars.

When you have to cite non-economic items into a discussion about the economy, you know you've lost the argument.

By the way - as always - you can thank a Dumbocrat (Slick Willy Clinton) for the wars. Had Bill Clinton done his job as Commander in Chief and address Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, 9/11 would have never happened.

 

[Rustic]

 

[Rustic]

 

[P@triot]

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

As the ignorant (you and your left-wing pals) become super ignorant (you and your left-wing pals), you believe dumber and dumber things. For real.

The Top 1% in this nation earned 19% of all income, but paid 35% of all federal taxes. By contrast, the bottom 50% earned 12% of all income, but paid a paltry and offensive 3% of all federal taxes.

In other words, the bottom parasites earned 63% of the income of the top earners, but paid just 0.9% of the taxes that the top earners paid. That is repulsive and the type of ignorance that could only come from the left. They earn 63% of the what they wealthy earn but don't even pay 1% of what the wealthy pay in taxes.

If you earn 63% of what the wealthy earns, you should at least pay 63% of what the wealthy pays.

 

[Rustic]

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

As the ignorant (you and your left-wing pals) become super ignorant (you and your left-wing pals), you believe dumber and dumber things. For real.

The Top 1% in this nation earned 19% of all income, but paid 35% of all federal taxes. By contrast, the bottom 50% earned 12% of all income, but paid a paltry and offensive 3% of all federal taxes.

In other words, the bottom parasites earned 63% of the income of the top earners, but paid just 0.9% of the taxes that the top earners paid. That is repulsive and the type of ignorance that could only come from the left.

If you earn 63% of what the wealthy earns, you should at least pay 63% of what the wealthy pays.

View attachment 129916

...and they aren't even represented... taxation without representation

 

[P@triot]

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

As the ignorant (you and your left-wing pals) become super ignorant (you and your left-wing pals), you believe dumber and dumber things. For real.

The Top 1% in this nation earned 19% of all income, but paid 35% of all federal taxes. By contrast, the bottom 50% earned 12% of all income, but paid a paltry and offensive 3% of all federal taxes.

In other words, the bottom parasites earned 63% of the income of the top earners, but paid just 0.9% of the taxes that the top earners paid. That is repulsive and the type of ignorance that could only come from the left.

If you earn 63% of what the wealthy earns, you should at least pay 63% of what the wealthy pays.

View attachment 129916

...and they aren't even represented... taxation without representation

Well I don't know about that. Aside from those that reside in Washington D.C., I'm not aware of a single wealthy person who doesn't have a representative in Congress.

 

[JonKoch]

The Bush recession was the worst in 80 years. Housing collapse, Massive debt. two quagmire wars.

When you have to cite non-economic items into a discussion about the economy, you know you've lost the argument.

By the way - as always - you can thank a Dumbocrat (Slick Willy Clinton) for the wars. Had Bill Clinton done his job as Commander in Chief and address Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda, 9/11 would have never happened.

The party of ''personal responsibility" steps up again *shaking head*

Q: Did Bill Clinton pass up a chance to kill Osama bin Laden?

A: Probably not, and it would not have mattered anyway as there was no evidence at the time that bin Laden had committed any crimes against American citizens

Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden? - FactCheck.org




Ex-CIA director: White House ignored months of warnings about 9/11 to avoid leaving ‘paper trail’ of culpability
Ex-CIA director: White House ignored months of warnings about 9/11 to avoid leaving ‘paper trail’ of culpability


‘The Attacks Will Be Spectacular’

An exclusive look at how the Bush administration ignored this warning from the CIA months before 9/11, along with others that were far more detailed than previously revealed.

‘There will be significant terrorist attacks against the United States in the coming weeks or months. The attacks will be spectacular.


How the Bush administration ignored a significant warning from the CIA months before 9/11

 

[JonKoch]

Yes ignore the Cit United study as well as GOP gerrymandering memo cupcake. Typical righttard

Excuses excuses excuses

Socialism never has and never will make anyone's life better, but you can choose if you want. Just leave the rest of us out of it

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Na, but it is the reason this country is in so much debt… Socialism never can pay its own bills

True NOT when you GUT those "job creators" taxes Cupcake

...In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income.


WAPO

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

Who gives a shit what people make or how little they make... everyone should pay the same dollar amount in taxes… Because any type of progressive tax is taxation without representation

More of your right wing OPINION not based in history. Got it