Right vs. Left is Logic vs. Emotion

[P@triot]

Taxation is based on ability to pay; are you advocating for a guaranteed income?

No shit. That's why we use a percentage. A person who made $1 has the ability to pay $0.35 of that $1.

 

[JonKoch]

One of the US Founders first socialized federal projects? FIRST NATIONAL HIGHWAY CUPCAKE

A highway is not "socialism", snowflake. Neither is a police force. Neither is a fire department. Neither is any of the other desperate examples that you dimwits attempt to use as propaganda.

Weird you have such a tiny brain cupcake


1. The Military/Defense - The United States military is the largest and most funded socialist program in the world. It operates thanks to our taxpayer dollars and protects the country as a whole. From the richest citizens to the homeless who sleep under the bridge. We are all protected by our military whether we pay taxes or not. This is complete socialism.

2. Highways/Roads - Those roads and highways you drive on every single day are completely taxpayer funded. Your tax dollars are used to maintain, expand, and preserve our highways and roads for every one's use. President Eisenhower was inspired by Germany's autobahn and implemented the idea right here in America. That's right, a republican president created our taxpayer funded, national highway system. This was a different time, before the republican party came down with a vicious case of rabies that never went away.



75 Ways Socialism Has Improved America

 

[danielpalos]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Na, but it is the reason this country is in so much debt… Socialism never can pay its own bills

True NOT when you GUT those "job creators" taxes Cupcake

...In other words, a person in the top 0.001 percent income bracket -- who would have an adjusted gross income of at least $62,000,000 -- pays the nearly same effective tax rate as somebody in the top 20 percent bracket who makes $85,000 in adjusted gross income.


WAPO

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

Who gives a shit what people make or how little they make... everyone should pay the same dollar amount in taxes… Because any type of progressive tax is taxation without representation

More of your right wing OPINION not based in history. Got it

Progressive taxes only appeals to spineless weasel's… envy is a weak emotion

Only in right wing fantasy is being fiscally tough on Only Taxes, "brave".

 

[danielpalos]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

How Socialists Built America

Socialists cannot build anything they're too busy panhandling and ripping other people that really work off

Socialism beat capitalism to Space.

 

[P@triot]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Too lazy to come up with a valid argument, right wingers?

There is no argument required for something that absurd. It's like claiming that the world isn't round and then demanding an argument otherwise.

 

[danielpalos]

As the rich become super-rich, they pay lower taxes. For real.

As the ignorant (you and your left-wing pals) become super ignorant (you and your left-wing pals), you believe dumber and dumber things. For real.

The Top 1% in this nation earned 19% of all income, but paid 35% of all federal taxes. By contrast, the bottom 50% earned 12% of all income, but paid a paltry and offensive 3% of all federal taxes.

In other words, the bottom parasites earned 63% of the income of the top earners, but paid just 0.9% of the taxes that the top earners paid. That is repulsive and the type of ignorance that could only come from the left. They earn 63% of the what they wealthy earn but don't even pay 1% of what the wealthy pay in taxes.

If you earn 63% of what the wealthy earns, you should at least pay 63% of what the wealthy pays.

View attachment 129916

Another right winger who doesn't understand INCOME taxes are only 25% of ALL US taxes?

Nobody said "all U.S. taxes" snowflake. Why do you have to create a straw man? Oh yeah, that's right, because I'm kicking your ass from one side of this board to the other.

I specifically stated federal taxes about, snowflake. The more your ego forces you down this path, the uglier it gets for you. You were wrong. Dead wrong. Like all left-wing snowflakes, you bought into the emotion of the propaganda instead of buying into the rational facts.

End the drug war, right wingers; don't "hate on the poor".

 

[P@triot]

Socialism beat capitalism to Space.

No it didn't. Capitalism had no demand to go to space, so it didn't try. One thing cannot "beat" something else if there was no competition and nobody showed up.

 

[danielpalos]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

How Socialists Built America

Snowflake....adding a link to propaganda opinion piece doesn't help your case. At all.

He already "raised you a substantiated opinion"; you need one too, to "stay in the game".

 

[P@triot]

End the drug war, right wingers; don't "hate on the poor".

End the parasite class, left-wingers. Don't hate law and order.

 

[JonKoch]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

Too lazy to come up with a valid argument, right wingers?

There is no argument required for something that absurd. It's like claiming that the world isn't round and then demanding an argument otherwise.

Plymouth Colony - Wikipedia

 

[Rustic]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

How Socialists Built America

Socialists cannot build anything they're too busy panhandling and ripping other people that really work off

Socialism beat capitalism to Space.

Socialism has only beat anything else to the free food table…

 

[P@triot]

He already "raised you a substantiated opinion"; you need one too, to "stay in the game".

I deal in facts. Opinions are for you emotional, irrational progressives who reject facts, science, data, etc.

 

[JonKoch]

End the drug war, right wingers; don't "hate on the poor".

End the parasite class, left-wingers. Don't hate law and order.

 

[JonKoch]

He already "raised you a substantiated opinion"; you need one too, to "stay in the game".

I deal in facts. Opinions are for you emotional, irrational progressives who reject facts, science, data, etc.

You deal is distortions, lies and misinformation Cupcake, learn the difference

 

[P@triot]

He already "raised you a substantiated opinion"; you need one too, to "stay in the game".

I deal in facts. Opinions are for you emotional, irrational progressives who reject facts, science, data, etc.

You deal is distortions, lies and misinformation Cupcake, learn the difference

Look at Jon bringing it strong with the old "I'm rubber, you're glue defense"

 

[JonKoch]

He already "raised you a substantiated opinion"; you need one too, to "stay in the game".

I deal in facts. Opinions are for you emotional, irrational progressives who reject facts, science, data, etc.

You deal is distortions, lies and misinformation Cupcake, learn the difference

Look at Jon bringing it strong with the old "I'm rubber, you're glue defense"

Sorry cupcake, pointing out your lies isn't pulling a 4th grade level Cheeto's move

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:
Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

It's logical for Repugs to support the traitor Trump who loves Russia more than his own country? That's a head-scratcher.

The real head scratcher is how we can run three independent investigations, believe in the significance of establishing a senate judiciary and house intelligence committee to handle investigations impartially by demanding an independent investigation, all because democrats trust a news story to be honest in its conclusions over the lack of any evidence producing a crime in the first place.

I believe most of us are familiar with the consequences in starting search parties and using state resources over intensionally, misleading, or false information, I can easily see the same accountability parallel being concluded here surrounding certain newspaper publications. The same penalties ought to apply in the case of intentionally piecing together, reporting falsified or misleading claims, and allowing such strong accusations to be published resulting in the waste of taxpayer dollars. Let these media sources be held responsible for such actions. Flip the investigation around that places the newspaper or media outlet in the hot seat, if such reporting is deemed to have occurred.

Ex-CIA chief John Brennan: Russians contacted Trump campaign
Ex-CIA chief John Brennan: Russians contacted Trump campaign - CNNPolitics.com


CIA director alerted FBI to pattern of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign associates


“I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons,” Brennan said, adding that he did not see proof of collusion before he left office on Jan. 20, but “felt as though the FBI investigation was certainly well-founded and needed to look into those issues.”





WAPO
CIA director alerted FBI to pattern of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign associates

No evidence of collusion or efforts to alter an election, in fact Hillary's acceptance of finances into her "foundation" from foreign government demonstrates a clear actual physical trail that goes well beyond just a face to face encounter with a foreign official. Financial contributions have a way of producing actual evidence, physical evidence that liberal democrats can't seem to find beyond having "met" someone. Likewise Obama must have been in collusion for simply facing foreign officials prior to his presidency. At least produce some actual evidence that places Trump in a different category from others who ran for the executive office, because these constant assumptions to conspire that is being produced are really pathetic. This is why I will get laughing emojis instead because they can't really say what makes Trump's case different from Hillary or any other politician, as well as the lack of a trail of physical evidence that was clearly evident through Mrs Clintons financial contributions from foreign nations which indictates actual conflict of interest to HER political position..

Actually, there is evidence that Russia interfered in our elections.

The Clinton Foundation is a charity & the Clintons take o money from it. Agent Orange does get foreign monies in his pocket every day from his business interests overseas.

Neither Obama nor Clinton had people lying about Russian contacts.

In response to your reply regarding Clinton "lying", Mrs Clinton only needed to meet privately at a tarmac regarding her investigation in seeking to get herself cleared.

Regarding Russia collusion:
As quoted among those involved in the investigation.

SOURCE 1
CNN’S WOLF BLITZER: “The last time we spoke, Senator, I asked you if you had actually seen evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russians, and you said to me -- and I am quoting you now -- you said, ‘not at this time.’ Has anything changed since we spoke last?”


SEN. FEINSTEIN: “Well, no -- no, it hasn't. …”


BLITZER: “But, I just want to be precise, Senator. In all of the -- you have had access from the Intelligence Committee, from the Judiciary Committee, all of the access you have had to very sensitive information, so far you have not seen any evidence of collusion, is that right?”


SEN. FEINSTEIN: “Well, evidence that would establish that there's collusion. There are all kinds of rumors around, there are newspaper stories, but that's not necessarily evidence.”


Feinstein: Still No Evidence Of Trump Camp-Russia Collusion


SOURCE 2 There Remains No Evidence Of Trump-Russia Collusion


SOURCE 3
"President Obama's former director of national intelligence and his former acting CIA director have both said they have seen no evidence of collusion," the official said. "Clapper repeated his assertion today."

The official also pointed to statements from some Democrats who said they had not seen evidence of collusion either.

White House highlights Clapper's lack of evidence on Trump-Russia collusion - CNNPolitics.com

After nearly 5 months of looking into this, it seems rather apparent that these are the only resulting Facts.

 

[danielpalos]

End the drug war, right wingers; don't "hate on the poor".

End the parasite class, left-wingers. Don't hate law and order.

What law and order; we don't have a drug war clause.

 

[ShaklesOfBigGov]

Jimmy Kimmel's recent viral monologue is a prime example of how the left values irrational emotions over logic and reason. That is why the left supports failed ideologies such as socialism, communism, etc. Because it feels good to them. They could care less that it ends in poverty, misery, and collapse.

Jimmy Kimmel illustrated this universal truth once again when he cried during his monologue about his baby (who is ok now) and proclaimed how nobody should have to decide between saving their child's life and money (as if anyone has ever had to make that "choice"). Life saving procedures cannot be denied regardless of a person's ability to pay. In addition to that inconvenient little fact, there is this gem:
Jimmy Kimmel’s Moving Story Shows Why Private Charity Trumps Government

It's logical for Repugs to support the traitor Trump who loves Russia more than his own country? That's a head-scratcher.

The real head scratcher is how we can run three independent investigations, believe in the significance of establishing a senate judiciary and house intelligence committee to handle investigations impartially by demanding an independent investigation, all because democrats trust a news story to be honest in its conclusions over the lack of any evidence producing a crime in the first place.

I believe most of us are familiar with the consequences in starting search parties and using state resources over intensionally, misleading, or false information, I can easily see the same accountability parallel being concluded here surrounding certain newspaper publications. The same penalties ought to apply in the case of intentionally piecing together, reporting falsified or misleading claims, and allowing such strong accusations to be published resulting in the waste of taxpayer dollars. Let these media sources be held responsible for such actions. Flip the investigation around that places the newspaper or media outlet in the hot seat, if such reporting is deemed to have occurred.

Ex-CIA chief John Brennan: Russians contacted Trump campaign
Ex-CIA chief John Brennan: Russians contacted Trump campaign - CNNPolitics.com


CIA director alerted FBI to pattern of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign associates


“I was worried by a number of the contacts that the Russians had with U.S. persons,” Brennan said, adding that he did not see proof of collusion before he left office on Jan. 20, but “felt as though the FBI investigation was certainly well-founded and needed to look into those issues.”





WAPO
CIA director alerted FBI to pattern of contacts between Russian officials and Trump campaign associates

No evidence of collusion or efforts to alter an election, in fact Hillary's acceptance of finances into her "foundation" from foreign government demonstrates a clear actual physical trail that goes well beyond just a face to face encounter with a foreign official. Financial contributions have a way of producing actual evidence, physical evidence that liberal democrats can't seem to find beyond having "met" someone. Likewise Obama must have been in collusion for simply facing foreign officials prior to his presidency. At least produce some actual evidence that places Trump in a different category from others who ran for the executive office, because these constant assumptions to conspire that is being produced are really pathetic. This is why I will get laughing emojis instead because they can't really say what makes Trump's case different from Hillary or any other politician, as well as the lack of a trail of physical evidence that was clearly evident through Mrs Clintons financial contributions from foreign nations which indictates actual conflict of interest to HER political position..

God thing there are investigations going on right cupcake?

Really I see no difference than the birther movements seeking Obama's impeachment, you can always find a fruit cake.

 

[danielpalos]

US was Founded on socialism cupcake.....

How Socialists Built America

Socialists cannot build anything they're too busy panhandling and ripping other people that really work off

Socialism beat capitalism to Space.

Socialism has only beat anything else to the free food table…

Capitalism died 1929; socialism has been bailing out capitalism, ever since.