Right Wing extremist nationalism

Was it "extreme right wing nationalsim" when liberals got us involved in the vietnam war too?

History 101, Eisenhower got us in Vietnam. JFK was assassinated because he planned to get us out. Johnson realized he was duped by the industrial military complex and declined to run again. Tricky Dick promised to get us out, but kept us there another seven years, for the profits of the military contractors. And almost started WWIII with his plan to nuke Vietnam.

History 101. Eisenhower sent advisors into S Vietnam. JFK greatly escalated the war efforts following the 61 white pages. Where he increased aid and sent even more advisors. Then, LBJ A DEMOCRAT, A LIBERAL, escalated the war to hot following the gulf of tonkin incident.


Why do all LOLberals try to rewrite history?
You are the one rewriting. You even admitted Eisenhower started it. And you omitted JFK's plan to end it. And you omitted Tricky Dick's escalation. You're really lame dude.
 
Shrub Jr. had all the faith in the world in the mission. "Mission accomplished", really?
Please explain the accomplishment. Just what did you brave heroes win?

A true military mission has no winners. Invariably, people die on both sides of the line.

But a well planned mission has accomplishments and its success is based on those accomplishments.....but that mission had no winners. No one said "we won the war".....

And no one came back saying they were winners.

But they all had pride in accomplishing their objectives.
Killing a million innocent women, children and elderly civilians is nothing to be proud of.
 
Why would someone holding a state of the art weapon care about what his commander "feels"?

just Asking that question makes it clear that the answer will not make any sense to you.

Humans are motivated by the belief in success.

Take it from there, Sparky.

When's the last time the US was interested in a military success?
Rumsfeld wasn't; he was ordered to bolster Cheney's off-bank accounts.

Really, how happy were troops when they were ordered to not shoot until they were killed first?

As for Rumsfeld.....he was a poor choice by Bush and the primary reason Bush did not get my vote for round 2.

As for Cheney....I will not respond to lame left wing propaganda.

As for your last line...

It is the current administration that is tying the hands of our men and women.

Just saying.
 
Eisenhower sent advisors. That's how diplomacy works following a world war. They were aiding S Vietnem diplomatically to curtail northern communism which was spreading. The HOT WAR, the violence involving american troops, came to be under LBJ, and JFK aided that significantly following the 61 white papers.

Eisnehower did not get the US into a hot conflict with North Veitnam. You either are deliberately trying to obscure history to make it appear to your world view, you're just lying (a typical LOLberal trait) or you are a moron. It could be all three.
 
Get real. They don't fear Obama, they sign up to go kill. Then they find out the consequences. Karma is a bitch.
For crying out loud...re-read the exchange booze breath

Gee Mr. Wizard, maybe you could explain why those brave heroes are afraid of Obama.

That's Madam Wizard to you booze breath

I'll help you out...the fear of the troops by some voters was the discussion.

It evolved....you didn't
 
So i ask again, was that extreme right wing nationalism?

Are you ready to answer the question yet, or do you need to take some time out, review history and recoup from that failure?
 
just Asking that question makes it clear that the answer will not make any sense to you.

Humans are motivated by the belief in success.

Take it from there, Sparky.

When's the last time the US was interested in a military success?
Rumsfeld wasn't; he was ordered to bolster Cheney's off-bank accounts.

Really, how happy were troops when they were ordered to not shoot until they were killed first?

As for Rumsfeld.....he was a poor choice by Bush and the primary reason Bush did not get my vote for round 2.

As for Cheney....I will not respond to lame left wing propaganda.

As for your last line...

It is the current administration that is tying the hands of our men and women.

Just saying.

"Just saying"...How lame.
I want facts proving our military is not equipped or how it is ordered to not go all out to preserve their lives.
 
Please explain the accomplishment. Just what did you brave heroes win?

A true military mission has no winners. Invariably, people die on both sides of the line.

But a well planned mission has accomplishments and its success is based on those accomplishments.....but that mission had no winners. No one said "we won the war".....

And no one came back saying they were winners.

But they all had pride in accomplishing their objectives.
Killing a million innocent women, children and elderly civilians is nothing to be proud of.

First of all...it was sadly about 200K INCLUSING the combatants.

Secondly, no one takes pride in killing innocent people.

Third....the reason the war lasted so long is because of the willingness of men and women in uniform to adhere to the directive to avoid collateral damage at all costs...INCLUDING THEIR OWN LIVES.....

So get the fuck off your high horse and stop belittling those that are there so you can say and od as you please.
 
When's the last time the US was interested in a military success?
Rumsfeld wasn't; he was ordered to bolster Cheney's off-bank accounts.

Really, how happy were troops when they were ordered to not shoot until they were killed first?

As for Rumsfeld.....he was a poor choice by Bush and the primary reason Bush did not get my vote for round 2.

As for Cheney....I will not respond to lame left wing propaganda.

As for your last line...

It is the current administration that is tying the hands of our men and women.

Just saying.

"Just saying"...How lame.
I want facts proving our military is not equipped or how it is ordered to not go all out to preserve their lives.

How often do you hear about US troops dropping 1000 lb bombs on schools and hospitals?

Or are you not aware that such facilities double as enemy strongholds.
 
And in vietnam, a war started by extreme Left Wing Nationalism, millions of innocent people, including children and women, were killed.

But of course, you can not blame a LOLberal for showing off raging hypocrsiy. They have no shame, so it's a waste of time. Hypocrisy is their default position on everything.
 
why are so many liberals mindless morons?

seriously i want to know. love the way the idiotic Left throws the fascism word around.

who is credited with basically inventing fascism? an Italian UNION MEMBER; MEMBER OF THE ITALIAN COMMUNIST PARTY, and SOCIALIST named MUSSOLINI.

the left; and i mean the Left all over the world; lives in denial of basic facts and realities


idiots and hypocrites
 
So i ask again, was that extreme right wing nationalism?

Are you ready to answer the question yet, or do you need to take some time out, review history and recoup from that failure?

Was what extreme right wing nationalism? The effort to militarize the country? yes Raygun's tripling of the defense budget? yes Raygun's STAR WARS? yes Raygun's selling chemical weapons to Saddam? yes Raygun's Iran/contra crimes? yes Shrub daddy's DESERT STORM? yes Shrub Jr.'s yellow cake lie? yes His invasion of Iraq? yes

That's Madam Wizard to you booze breath

I'll help you out...the fear of the troops by some voters was the discussion.

It evolved....you didn't

Yo R.etarded D.ipshit, the discussion was right wing extremism. Try to stay on topic.
 
I want to thank all the war mongering cons for proving the point of this thread.
 
So i ask again, was that extreme right wing nationalism?

Are you ready to answer the question yet, or do you need to take some time out, review history and recoup from that failure?

Was what extreme right wing nationalism? The effort to militarize the country? yes Raygun's tripling of the defense budget? yes Raygun's STAR WARS? yes Raygun's selling chemical weapons to Saddam? yes Raygun's Iran/contra crimes? yes Shrub daddy's DESERT STORM? yes Shrub Jr.'s yellow cake lie? yes His invasion of Iraq? yes

That's Madam Wizard to you booze breath

I'll help you out...the fear of the troops by some voters was the discussion.

It evolved....you didn't

Yo R.etarded D.ipshit, the discussion was right wing extremism. Try to stay on topic.

Good lord you're stupid. Yes it was, boozebreath, but you still managed to screw the pooch and eff up your own thread.

Good job!
 
why is it you don't know that there is a difference between pure democracy and democracy?



do you deny dictionaries are correct?
 
poor left-wing idiots..

North Korea is a LEFT-WING PARADISE


NO MEAN OL CORPORATIONS; and the most "fair" income equality ratio on planet Earth!!

EVERYBODY IS EQUALLY POOR


why are libs such morons?
 
So i ask again, was that extreme right wing nationalism?

Are you ready to answer the question yet, or do you need to take some time out, review history and recoup from that failure?

Was what extreme right wing nationalism? The effort to militarize the country? yes Raygun's tripling of the defense budget? yes Raygun's STAR WARS? yes Raygun's selling chemical weapons to Saddam? yes Raygun's Iran/contra crimes? yes Shrub daddy's DESERT STORM? yes Shrub Jr.'s yellow cake lie? yes His invasion of Iraq? yes

That's Madam Wizard to you booze breath

I'll help you out...the fear of the troops by some voters was the discussion.

It evolved....you didn't

Yo R.etarded D.ipshit, the discussion was right wing extremism. Try to stay on topic.

yes left-wing moron; the discussion is right-wing extremism and the loser left-wing idiots projecting their own intolerance and EXTREMISM onto others.. like you che guevara wannabe leftard
 

Forum List

Back
Top