PubliusInfinitum
Rookie
- Aug 18, 2008
- 6,805
- 729
- 0
- Banned
- #141
It's AG-whats-her-name alright... let there be no doubt.
Of course fallacious conclusions aren't necessary... But that is nonetheless what ya advanced... thus your former failure... and i see you've returned to offer a brand NEW failure. Well that's SUPER, let's get right to it...
You already lost on this one sis... You projected that your flaccid little screed wasn't responded to, and that the reason for this absence of a response was due to the inadequacy of your opposition, in the face of your superior position. We've been over this... it's long since been discredited. So let's move on...
Your position is invalid... thus illegitimate...
Yeah that was good stuff and while brilliant, immutable fact; what we're lookig for here is a position which CONTESTS IT... and one which speaks ot the practical application of both fascism and socialism and decidely NOT the insipid ranting of leftwing advocactes espousing one discredited theory or another.
No there's not... you want to imply that various unstated pedantic theoretical distinctions represent vast gulfs of distinctions... when in fact, left-think rejects sustainable, valid human rights of the natural order... that's all there is sis... enthereal leftism and the cosmic complexity of all that represents and the natural order where people of good faith trade fair value for fair value... period.
No doubt you are afraid... but that IS the case. And your stating otherwise isn't going to change it.
Does anyone needs anything else to know that this IS AG-WHATS-HER-NAME ?
There is no more efficient use of labor, than where labor comes to the table to SOLVE THE PROBLEMS WHICH THAT RESPECTIVE LABOR SEEKS TO SOLVE... through exchanging the fair value of their labor for what THEY ACCEPT AS FAIR VALUE IN TRADE.
THEORIES on the issue which suggest otherwise have been DISPROVEN time and AGAIN where Socialism, Fascism and Communism HAVE FAILED...
An invalid theory is a BAD THEORY... and your need to reject their failure has NO BEARING ON THOSE FAILURES.
... but AGAIN AG... that was a great "TRY" comrade... ya FAILED MISERABLY... but 'lose' is what LOSERS DO... now isn't it?
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
Ya did the BEST ya could, Godbless ya.![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
Well that's what I suspected... you offered a position and when it wasn't contested, by virtue of the simple fact that it wasn't read, you erroneously concluded that the position was superior; and superior to the extent that you concluded that the opposition could not even mount a contest...
Such an assumption did not even need to be made.
Of course fallacious conclusions aren't necessary... But that is nonetheless what ya advanced... thus your former failure... and i see you've returned to offer a brand NEW failure. Well that's SUPER, let's get right to it...
Your prior inadequacies already indicated your woeful incompetence, and accordingly, I expected that you would be unable to provide a sufficient response.
You already lost on this one sis... You projected that your flaccid little screed wasn't responded to, and that the reason for this absence of a response was due to the inadequacy of your opposition, in the face of your superior position. We've been over this... it's long since been discredited. So let's move on...
You legitimize these expectations with drivel such as this:
Your position is invalid... thus illegitimate...
Facism is purely, wholly, solely, utterly, thoroughly and without exception a function of the ideological left... European fascism is American Progressivism... which is to say the US Progressive is the ideological equivilent to the European facist. The ONLY THING that separates the Fascist from the socialist is the "nationalist' bent which fascism (Progressivism) utilizes... where the Socialist rejects national sovereignty focusing it's loyalty upon Socialism itself.
Yeah that was good stuff and while brilliant, immutable fact; what we're lookig for here is a position which CONTESTS IT... and one which speaks ot the practical application of both fascism and socialism and decidely NOT the insipid ranting of leftwing advocactes espousing one discredited theory or another.
There are flagrantly obvious divergences between fascism, socialism, and liberal democratic capitalism.
No there's not... you want to imply that various unstated pedantic theoretical distinctions represent vast gulfs of distinctions... when in fact, left-think rejects sustainable, valid human rights of the natural order... that's all there is sis... enthereal leftism and the cosmic complexity of all that represents and the natural order where people of good faith trade fair value for fair value... period.
PubliusInfinitum said:ROFLMNAO... Capitalism is merely the natural order... to even believe that it CAN fail, forces one to redefine FAILURE...
That's not the case, I'm afraid!
No doubt you are afraid... but that IS the case. And your stating otherwise isn't going to change it.
The greatest failure of capitalism is embedded in the inefficient labor market that it promotes, which is plagued by the twin problems of influence and agency costs, those caused by the prevalence of information asymmetries between economic agents, resulting in the agency problems of adverse selection and moral hazard, just to illustrate an example.
Does anyone needs anything else to know that this IS AG-WHATS-HER-NAME ?
There is no more efficient use of labor, than where labor comes to the table to SOLVE THE PROBLEMS WHICH THAT RESPECTIVE LABOR SEEKS TO SOLVE... through exchanging the fair value of their labor for what THEY ACCEPT AS FAIR VALUE IN TRADE.
THEORIES on the issue which suggest otherwise have been DISPROVEN time and AGAIN where Socialism, Fascism and Communism HAVE FAILED...
An invalid theory is a BAD THEORY... and your need to reject their failure has NO BEARING ON THOSE FAILURES.
Super... Sadly... leftist policy failures are BAD PLANS... Leftism FAILS... it MUST FAIL... it cannot SUCCEED... meaning that the PLAN that left-think conjures, is absent sound financial PRINCIPLE... THUS IT IS DOOMED TO SUFFER THE CONSEQUENCES BORN UPON THE ATTEMPT TO PRACTICE ABSENCE SOUND, VIRTUOUS PRINCIPLE WHICH ASSURE SUCCESS... or at least gets as close to an assurance as humanity can get.The leftists thus feel that to spare the pain born of an ebbing economy, their solution is to maintain economy in an ethereal constant state of inadequacy... which is absurd because such will only feed the natural desire of the individual to excell beyond that state of inadequacy, promoting revolution, generating an imbalance and BAM... an ebbing fall back to balance; causing vastly MORE suffering through the UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES of failed leftist policy, than would otherwise have occurred.
This global meltdown that we're currently experiencing is a direct result of leftist manipulation of the financial markets, it is being EXTENDED due to leftist manaipulation of those markets and the PAIN AND SUFFERING IS BEING INTENSIFIED AND PROLONGED by the leftist policies which CREATED THE PAIN TO BEGIN WITH.
All existing capitalist markets are reliant on economic planning.
... but AGAIN AG... that was a great "TRY" comrade... ya FAILED MISERABLY... but 'lose' is what LOSERS DO... now isn't it?
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
![clap2 :clap2: :clap2:](/styles/smilies/clap2.gif)
Last edited: