That the federal government equally protects the negative liberties of individuals from illegitimate aggression by the states is not federalism , it is individualism
That is what states rights are under the 10th amendment.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That the federal government equally protects the negative liberties of individuals from illegitimate aggression by the states is not federalism , it is individualism
You are off in some kind of la-la land probably due to your own misunderstanding of what you think I said or meant. No, I don't follow this thread or what you are saying to people. It is not that interesting. You seemed to want to know my thought process. I tried my best to explain in; you did your best to make turn it into something convoluted to serve your point...introducing the "Meriweather in NotfooledbyW head", which is not even close to my own reality.NFBW: But you do contradict yourself @Meriweather unless you can tell me that every given state government is not at all a government. Think about that and get back to me.
Sweetheart, it is not that difficult.NFBW: I am going by exactly what you write and meant. You contradict yourself in the very same sentence. You say you are opposed to government dictating abortion policy and then turn around and say you vote for politicians who will dictate abortion policy if enough of them get elected into public office. Tell me where I am misrepresenting what you have eternalized in writing.
Are you saying you care a lot, but it is possible for you to care less than you do? Sweet!NFBW: I could care less i
By principles of non violence and individualism , the normative rites of a state under us 10th amendment are to equally protect the negative liberties of individuals entitled by live birth to receive them and limited to safety and or security by eisegesis of us 9th amendment .That is what states rights are under the 10th amendment.
NFBW: That is exactly what all the celebrants of the Dobbs decision are for - the tyranny of the majority over pregnant women - it is simply a matter of that fact.which protects the individual from populism of democracy as tyranny by majority
“Tyranny of the majority?”NFBW: That is exactly what all the celebrants of the Dobbs decision are for - the tyranny of the majority over pregnant women - it is simply a matter of that fact.
END2212262053
Blah blah blah....10th says its up to the individual states to create law regarding abortion...........supported by SCOTUS." Advocates For Traitors Against Us Republic Barking Up An Empty Tree "
* Us 9th Amendment Rigorous Dispatch Of Tyranny By Majority Against Individualism Through Us 10th Amendment Conjectures *
By principles of non violence and individualism , the normative rites of a state under us 10th amendment are to equally protect the negative liberties of individuals entitled by live birth to receive them and limited to safety and or security by eisegesis of us 9th amendment .
When one or more individuals is are violating the negative liberties of one or more other individuals and the violations are against safety and or security , a state interest exists and is not prohibited under us 10th amendment ,
The roe v wade decision ruled that in the first trimester abortion was between a doctor and a patient , as the procedures complied with safety and security constraints , whereas in the second trimester states could prescribe laws to ensure that abortion procedures were safe - from which trap laws arose , while in the third trimester post natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement for equal protection - given an ability to survive an imminent live birth , the roe v wade court made reference to a " potential life " and ruled that a state interest could begin and that states could proscribe abortion in the third trimester except to protect the life of the mother .
Clearly the roe v wade decision is an application of state rites to provision safety and or security for equal protection of negative liberties among individuals entitled by live birth to receive them as prescribed by us 9th , 10th and 14th amendments .
The us 9th amendment stipulates equal protection of negative liberty constraints upon state interests in us 10th amendment , which protects the individual from populism of democracy as tyranny by majority , whether at a federal or at a state level , and such is the basis of this us republic from its credo of e pluribus unum that includes principles of non violence and individualism .
You do recognize this as government involvement? Government making the decision? My position is that the government should not care about abortion one way or another. I have said this ad nauseum.NFBW: What rulings? ROE V Wade began when a private citizen who was pregnant sued the state of Texas and won when it made it to the Supreme Court.
You may finally have it! Government should not care one way or the other! It should not be in their purview AT ALL. It is not government business or interest the government at all, any more than it is government business to decide what color I paint my bathroom.There are only elected officials who pass laws that require a woman to carry a pregnancy full term unless