NotfooledbyW
Gold Member
- Jul 9, 2014
- 25,122
- 4,991
- 245
beautress221116-#5,640 “I don't recall seeing the words "fetus which has not met a birth requirement" in the Constitution. What article of the Constitution did you see those words in?”
NFBW: Monk-Eye didn’t tell you that the words "fetus which has not met a birth requirement" are actually written in the Constitution.
Monk-Eye is saying that ….
He is correct. You suffer a misunderstanding of what a woman’s right to reproductive freedom actually is.
END22111616438 Carmel by the Sea
NFBW: Monk-Eye didn’t tell you that the words "fetus which has not met a birth requirement" are actually written in the Constitution.
Monk-Eye is saying that ….
NFBW: he is saying as I interpret it, that the Catholic Trump Justices on the Supreme Court inserted and actually moved the citizenship requirement in the Constitution from actual birth to the religious Catholic moment of conception to allow states to ban the procedure of abortion based on the rediculous concept that a majority can vote to stop a pregnant woman from having a medical procedure to end it.The only thing inserted into the constitution a failed understanding that a state interest is prohibited in protecting a wright to life of a zygote , or embryo , or fetus which has not met a birth requirement to receive it .
He is correct. You suffer a misunderstanding of what a woman’s right to reproductive freedom actually is.
END22111616438 Carmel by the Sea