Papageorgio
The Ultimate Winner
- May 18, 2010
- 61,401
- 18,628
What a mess in your response, when you educate yourself on how to use the board let us know.RvW was reversed because white extremist Christians want it reversed and they have a majority on the USSC that is sympathetic to letting states decide if they want to force full term gestation on women by banning a safe medical procedure based upon tyranny of the majority in control of a state.
Do you live in one of the states that make up the United States of America? Why does a state government have a right to
force full term gestation in a woman’s body by banning access to a safe medical procedure where she lives.
When I was told I am going to be a father I believed what made my wife’s belly bigger was a baby.
When my daughters told me they were expecting to have a baby I followed their lead and called it a baby.
I thought you said you agree what a woman does with her body is none of our business; but then you make it your business with the white religious right wanting to know what every woman who gets pregnant calls the living human organism beginning the earliest stages of life in her body.
No. It’s none of our business what goes on inside a woman’s body when we are not involved with them,
No pregnant woman is obligated to refer to a part of her body by sone standard you and the extremist religious right want set. If she wants to have a baby it’s a baby. If she does not want to have a baby it’s a terminated pregnancy or whatever she want’s to call it.
USSC can declare a state law unconstitutional when when it needlessly deprives a pregnant of her right to privacy when chiising to terminate an unwanted pregnancy.
No, She does no harm when she has an abortion to the public. She was born with the privilege that is having autonomy over her body.
It can strike down laws that needlessly restrict individual’s human right.
What about them? You wrote this: