Edgetho
Platinum Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 15,830
- 7,094
- 390
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
![24td3t.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Ftheflypaper.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F02%2F24td3t.jpg&hash=a0f131776c7b450ba620e0408f242e64)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
Progressives lie about everything
Rolling Stone is progressive? Oh right, everything you dont like is...sorry continue
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:
"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."
It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.
Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid
The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.
The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.
Nobody has to lose their jobs. You see, they had good intentions in running that story. It doesn't actually matter that it was completely made up bullshit. That's how it works with the Marxists.
Spot On. But who reads Rolling Stone anymore anyway? It's part of the old Communist dinosaur media. It's stale and irrelevant.
Spot On. But who reads Rolling Stone anymore anyway? It's part of the old Communist dinosaur media. It's stale and irrelevant.
They get quoted a lot.
That's how the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media works much of the time.
One outlet starts a lie, another media source quotes it, ten more quote it and analyze it, the Networks pick it up and do a story on it like it's the Gospel, etc, etc.
The whole thing is a lie. The entire dimocrap system is just one big lie made up of countless smaller lies.
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:
"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."
It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.
Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:
"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."
It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.
Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid
The original story is what made it "political" you putz! You had an activist writer with an agenda. She wrote a story based not on the facts but on that agenda. Rolling Stone took her story and ran it without fact checking it because it corresponded so closely with what THEY believed to be true!
To turn around now and say that people are trying to make this "political" is about as disingenuous as it gets...
The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.
It just shows, either way, that the media is fucked.Who the hell do they think they are?
Fox??
Recall they published the interview with McChrystal. So yeah they have more credibility than, say, Rachel Maddow.The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.
Rolling Stone had credibility? REALLY?!