Rolling Stone Retracts Article on Rape at University of Virginia

Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid
24td3t.jpg
 
Progressives lie about everything


Rolling Stone is progressive? Oh right, everything you dont like is...sorry continue

Oh for God's sake...you can't even bring yourself to admit that Rolling Stone is a progressively tilted publication, can you? When you reach that level of self delusion, Closed...it's time for some serious self reflection about your own biases.
 
Rolling Stone won't fire anyone because the bottom line is that they're not sorry they published the story...they're only sorry that they were exposed as the "anti" journalists that they are. This kind of story is what you end up with when you start off with a premise and then alter the facts to fit your world view.
 
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid

Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:

"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."

It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.
 
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid

Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:

"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."

It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.

Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid
 
What bothers me about this story, is the concern for the woman that lied about the rape. And the disregard for the men she smeared. She should be going to jail for filing a false police report. Instead, her identity is being kept secret.
 
Wow, the Communist/Progressive Press takes another big hit. Can you believe anything it 'reports' anymore? Doesn't look like it. Didn't even fire the moron responsible. Even fellow Communists/Progressives should be demanding that. But then again, they are wingnuts who get their 'news information' from 'The Daily Show' and 'The View.' So go figure.
 
The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.

Nobody has to lose their jobs. You see, they had good intentions in running that story. It doesn't actually matter that it was completely made up bullshit. That's how it works with the Marxists.
 
The worst part is no one losing his job over this. WTF? Rolling Stone will lose all credibility if it does not fire those involved.

Nobody has to lose their jobs. You see, they had good intentions in running that story. It doesn't actually matter that it was completely made up bullshit. That's how it works with the Marxists.

Spot On. But who reads Rolling Stone anymore anyway? It's part of the old Communist dinosaur media. It's stale and irrelevant.
 
Spot On. But who reads Rolling Stone anymore anyway? It's part of the old Communist dinosaur media. It's stale and irrelevant.

They get quoted a lot.

That's how the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media works much of the time.

One outlet starts a lie, another media source quotes it, ten more quote it and analyze it, the Networks pick it up and do a story on it like it's the Gospel, etc, etc.

The whole thing is a lie. The entire dimocrap system is just one big lie made up of countless smaller lies.
 
Spot On. But who reads Rolling Stone anymore anyway? It's part of the old Communist dinosaur media. It's stale and irrelevant.

They get quoted a lot.

That's how the DISGUSTING FILTH in the Lame Stream Media works much of the time.

One outlet starts a lie, another media source quotes it, ten more quote it and analyze it, the Networks pick it up and do a story on it like it's the Gospel, etc, etc.

The whole thing is a lie. The entire dimocrap system is just one big lie made up of countless smaller lies.

Rolling Stone is only relevant to old pathetic fellow Communists/Progressives. Basically, old hippies who never grew up. Wingnuts who still read Rolling Stone are the people who get their 'news information' from Whoopie Goldberg's stanky butthole on 'The View.'...




 
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid

Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:

"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."

It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.

Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid

The original story is what made it "political" you putz! You had an activist writer with an agenda. She wrote a story based not on the facts but on that agenda. Rolling Stone took her story and ran it without fact checking it because it corresponded so closely with what THEY believed to be true!

To turn around now and say that people are trying to make this "political" is about as disingenuous as it gets...
 
Rolling stone should retract the story if theres any inconsistencies but to make this political is just stupid

Didn't read the link did ya? From the link:

"It has been clear for months that Rolling Stone committed journalistic malpractice in its discredited story about an alleged sexual assault at the University of Virginia. Sunday night brought additional details on the magazine's failures."

It was much more than inconsistencies and this story has been on this board for weeks, this is just the conclusion.

Uh ok, they should retract the story but to make this political is just stupid

The original story is what made it "political" you putz! You had an activist writer with an agenda. She wrote a story based not on the facts but on that agenda. Rolling Stone took her story and ran it without fact checking it because it corresponded so closely with what THEY believed to be true!

To turn around now and say that people are trying to make this "political" is about as disingenuous as it gets...

Thanks for supporting the political slant with anger and innuendo. That helped....you look like a fool.

"Someone had an agenda" - How you know? "BECAUSE I THINK IT!"

"Not based on facts" - Oh ok - "Which means its Democrat!"

"I said agenda twice" - what agenda? - "LIBERALS ARRGRGG!!"
 

Forum List

Back
Top