CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 147,930
- 71,152
- 2,330
poor comparison, papa. Obama did not act on Wright's teachings, and Romney ignored his.
So you're saying Rev Wright is a radical?
What do you object to in Rev. Wrights sermons?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
poor comparison, papa. Obama did not act on Wright's teachings, and Romney ignored his.
FakeJakeStarkey said:The point is that some of the kids who were there confirming the story.
It has NOT been debunked you lying sack of shit
There are no witnesses to the event, dipstick.
Yeah, there are, and you are a liar.
poor comparison, papa. Obama did not act on Wright's teachings, and Romney ignored his.
1965? And this bulling incident is bigger than Obama as late as 2008 was a student of Jeremiah (God Damn America) Wright, who Obama claimed was his mentor for 20 years?
No one admitted to being a homosexual in 1965, I went through high school in the late 70's and no one admitted to being a homosexual, yet many were teased because that was the culture in school. It wasn't just bullies, it was a standard, right or wrong. There was no stopping others if the term was used, or you were called pussy, gay, queer and on and on. Today you are kicked out, back them the teachers told you to get over it.
There are no witnesses to the event, dipstick.
Yeah, there are, and you are a liar.
No there aren't, turd. All the "witnesses" admit they didn't see it happen.
common knowledge need not be sourced.
FakeJakeStarkey said:The point is that some of the kids who were there confirming the story.
Yeah, there are, and you are a liar.
No there aren't, turd. All the "witnesses" admit they didn't see it happen.
blogs don't count as sources, sonny;' you do know that?
Yeah, there are, and you are a liar.
No there aren't, turd. All the "witnesses" admit they didn't see it happen.
blogs don't count as sources, sonny;' you do know that?
a fucking blog?
REALLY?
Blogs were crucial to revealing that Dan Rather's slander against President Bush was based on forged documents.
a fucking blog?
REALLY?
Blogs were crucial to revealing that Dan Rather's slander against President Bush was based on forged documents.
There was no slander. President Bush got preferential treatment by his commander.
Blogs were crucial to revealing that Dan Rather's slander against President Bush was based on forged documents.
There was no slander. President Bush got preferential treatment by his commander.
In other words, you know it's true even though the supporting documents were proven to be forged?
There are democrats who still believe the Rather memo is true. Fortunately this time the democrats are going to lie themselves right into a loss.
There was no slander. President Bush got preferential treatment by his commander.
In other words, you know it's true even though the supporting documents were proven to be forged?
George W. Bush was an excellent pilot. Pilots were sorely needed in Vietnam. Bush said on many occasions he didn't want to go to Vietnam.
So why wasn't he sent?
We are talking about Romney and bullying, not Bush, Clinton, or George Washington.
I want to vote for Romney but he has to come clean on this issue. Millions and millions, I believe, feel the same as I do. My friends at the U, the school district, and work, etc, feel the same way.
The false narrative about Romney proves once and for all that Obama is nothing more then a corrupt and sleazy thug from from Chicago.
Romney stated clearly that he did not recall the incident- but it having been so long ago {47 years} that he had pulled pranks and that he was sorry if he had harmed anyone.
But Obama and his scabs have participated in grown up lying and bullying... He so dishonors the office and the American people.
The Washington Post is forced to edit its Mitt Romney gay bullying story because it contained false reporting.
It has been known for quite some time that the mainstream media is nothing more than a propaganda arm for the Democrat party, that is not new, but what is new is the way the mainstream media has thrown away its journalistic integrity in recent days. It used to just be the case that there was a liberal bias to most of what was seen and heard in the mainstream media, and that was easy enough to deal with, but lately they have stooped to lying and falsifying evidence to push the narrative they wish to see advanced. And that isn’t so easily dealt with.
We first saw the most glaring examples of this during the Zimmerman/Martin fiasco down in Florida when, in an attempt to push a hate crime and anti-gun agenda, NBC, CBS, and CNN all were caught altering the so-called evidence in the case. All three stations eventually had to backtrack from their outright false reporting.
more
FakeJakeStarkey said:Like I would believe you before the classmates who were there?
We are talking about Romney and bullying, not Bush, Clinton, or George Washington.
I want to vote for Romney but he has to come clean on this issue. Millions and millions, I believe, feel the same as I do. My friends at the U, the school district, and work, etc, feel the same way.