Seawytch
Information isnt Advocacy
Only one person can put all this speculation to rest...and his wife has already said that they've given all "you people " need to understand.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Show your papers Willard!
Show your sources Harry.
SFTU Black Fabel
What is Romney afraid of? He should release the records.
I think this is more serious for Mittens than the CONservatives are letting on.
I can tell by Rush Limbaugh's panicked reaction to this LOL!
Despicable Dingy Harry Reid Executes Obama/Axelrod Smear on Mitt Romney - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Show your sources Harry.
SFTU Black Fabel
What is Romney afraid of? He should release the records.
I think this is more serious for Mittens than the CONservatives are letting on.
I can tell by Rush Limbaugh's panicked reaction to this LOL!
Despicable Dingy Harry Reid Executes Obama/Axelrod Smear on Mitt Romney - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Whatever is in there must be worse than all the speculation. It's all so deliciously political...
Show your sources Harry.
SFTU Black Fabel
What is Romney afraid of? He should release the records.
I think this is more serious for Mittens than the CONservatives are letting on.
I can tell by Rush Limbaugh's panicked reaction to this LOL!
Despicable Dingy Harry Reid Executes Obama/Axelrod Smear on Mitt Romney - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Whatever is in there must be worse than all the speculation. It's all so deliciously political...
What is Romney afraid of? He should release the records.
I think this is more serious for Mittens than the CONservatives are letting on.
I can tell by Rush Limbaugh's panicked reaction to this LOL!
Despicable Dingy Harry Reid Executes Obama/Axelrod Smear on Mitt Romney - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Whatever is in there must be worse than all the speculation. It's all so deliciously political...
No. What Harry Reid did was not "deliciously political", it was a corrupt use of power by an agent of the government against someone who is still a private American citizen. It is disgraceful and anyone with any semblance of decency recognizes that.
What is Romney afraid of? He should release the records.
I think this is more serious for Mittens than the CONservatives are letting on.
I can tell by Rush Limbaugh's panicked reaction to this LOL!
Despicable Dingy Harry Reid Executes Obama/Axelrod Smear on Mitt Romney - The Rush Limbaugh Show
Whatever is in there must be worse than all the speculation. It's all so deliciously political...
No. What Harry Reid did was not "deliciously political", it was a corrupt use of power by an agent of the government against someone who is still a private American citizen. It is disgraceful and anyone with any semblance of decency recognizes that.
wait ... Wait ... Do i have this right?
Romney: I refuse to release any more tax returns.
Reid: That's because you didn't pay any taxes!
Romney: Yeah? Prove it!
Whatever is in there must be worse than all the speculation. It's all so deliciously political...
No. What Harry Reid did was not "deliciously political", it was a corrupt use of power by an agent of the government against someone who is still a private American citizen. It is disgraceful and anyone with any semblance of decency recognizes that.
I love hyperbole in the morning. It goes great with coffee.
Romney could put it all to rest by letting us see his tax returns. What's he hiding?
No. What Harry Reid did was not "deliciously political", it was a corrupt use of power by an agent of the government against someone who is still a private American citizen. It is disgraceful and anyone with any semblance of decency recognizes that.
I love hyperbole in the morning. It goes great with coffee.
Romney could put it all to rest by letting us see his tax returns. What's he hiding?
Chick Fil A goes even better. Romney doesn't owe ewe anything. He's smart enough to know he's being baited.. deal with it asswipe.
Interesting that after all these years in public life and different offices
this non issue is being pursed by the left
The law is pretty clear - reread it
no disclosure of any information
So lets set the record straight-
you firmly believe that disclosure of tax payer
information on the Senate floor by a Senator is perfectly legal?
So Reid could disclose your tax information tomorrow
on the Senate floor and that would be legal
Interesting that after all these years in public life and different offices
this non issue is being pursed by the left
The law is pretty clear - reread it
no disclosure of any information
So lets set the record straight-
you firmly believe that disclosure of tax payer
information on the Senate floor by a Senator is perfectly legal?
So Reid could disclose your tax information tomorrow
on the Senate floor and that would be legal
I have read the relevant portions of the law (including those you declined to provide) multiple times and made several points related to my reading. It seems to me that the way for us to move forward is for you to address the points I have made and which are currently uncontested rather than for me to read through the law again.
Let us set the record straight: the key here is the origin of the Senator's information. If he disclosed information that appears on my tax return (such as my name or my income level) but that he obtained from another, non-tax source (such as a public document or, say, talking to me) then his act would not be a violation of the law you cited. That is not to say that such an act would necessarily be advisable, ethical, non-actionable, or even possible-- but it would not be a violation of the law you cited.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities.
I think Reid is probably correct. The ultra rich can easily avoid paying taxes so it isn't a stretch to believe that Mitten went ten years without paying them.
How to Pay No Taxes: 10 Strategies Used by the Rich - Businessweek
Interesting that after all these years in public life and different offices
this non issue is being pursed by the left
The law is pretty clear - reread it
no disclosure of any information
So lets set the record straight-
you firmly believe that disclosure of tax payer
information on the Senate floor by a Senator is perfectly legal?
So Reid could disclose your tax information tomorrow
on the Senate floor and that would be legal
I have read the relevant portions of the law (including those you declined to provide) multiple times and made several points related to my reading. It seems to me that the way for us to move forward is for you to address the points I have made and which are currently uncontested rather than for me to read through the law again.
Let us set the record straight: the key here is the origin of the Senator's information. If he disclosed information that appears on my tax return (such as my name or my income level) but that he obtained from another, non-tax source (such as a public document or, say, talking to me) then his act would not be a violation of the law you cited. That is not to say that such an act would necessarily be advisable, ethical, non-actionable, or even possible-- but it would not be a violation of the law you cited.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities.
then why doesn't the slimey mother fucker realease Romneys taxes?
Interesting that after all these years in public life and different offices
this non issue is being pursed by the left
The law is pretty clear - reread it
no disclosure of any information
So lets set the record straight-
you firmly believe that disclosure of tax payer
information on the Senate floor by a Senator is perfectly legal?
So Reid could disclose your tax information tomorrow
on the Senate floor and that would be legal
I have read the relevant portions of the law (including those you declined to provide) multiple times and made several points related to my reading. It seems to me that the way for us to move forward is for you to address the points I have made and which are currently uncontested rather than for me to read through the law again.
Let us set the record straight: the key here is the origin of the Senator's information. If he disclosed information that appears on my tax return (such as my name or my income level) but that he obtained from another, non-tax source (such as a public document or, say, talking to me) then his act would not be a violation of the law you cited. That is not to say that such an act would necessarily be advisable, ethical, non-actionable, or even possible-- but it would not be a violation of the law you cited.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities.
then why doesn't the slimey mother fucker realease Romneys taxes?
I have read the relevant portions of the law (including those you declined to provide) multiple times and made several points related to my reading. It seems to me that the way for us to move forward is for you to address the points I have made and which are currently uncontested rather than for me to read through the law again.
Let us set the record straight: the key here is the origin of the Senator's information. If he disclosed information that appears on my tax return (such as my name or my income level) but that he obtained from another, non-tax source (such as a public document or, say, talking to me) then his act would not be a violation of the law you cited. That is not to say that such an act would necessarily be advisable, ethical, non-actionable, or even possible-- but it would not be a violation of the law you cited.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities.
then why doesn't the slimey mother fucker realease Romneys taxes?
Assuming "slimey mother fucker [sic]" refers to Reid, I'm not even sure whether he has access to Romney's tax returns. If he does and he did release them he would probably be prosecuted (if caught). I believe there are laws against improperly obtaining tax returns, so his Senatorial immunity for speech would not necessarily protect him. And Reid might well be morally opposed to such an act anyway.
Reid has never released his taxes maybe he's speaking from experience. He's never paid his taxes.
then why doesn't the slimey mother fucker realease Romneys taxes?
Assuming "slimey mother fucker [sic]" refers to Reid, I'm not even sure whether he has access to Romney's tax returns. If he does and he did release them he would probably be prosecuted (if caught). I believe there are laws against improperly obtaining tax returns, so his Senatorial immunity for speech would not necessarily protect him. And Reid might well be morally opposed to such an act anyway.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities. these were your words.
you seem to be talking out of both sides of your mouth as well as your ass.
Interesting that after all these years in public life and different offices
this non issue is being pursed by the left
The law is pretty clear - reread it
no disclosure of any information
So lets set the record straight-
you firmly believe that disclosure of tax payer
information on the Senate floor by a Senator is perfectly legal?
So Reid could disclose your tax information tomorrow
on the Senate floor and that would be legal
I have read the relevant portions of the law (including those you declined to provide) multiple times and made several points related to my reading. It seems to me that the way for us to move forward is for you to address the points I have made and which are currently uncontested rather than for me to read through the law again.
Let us set the record straight: the key here is the origin of the Senator's information. If he disclosed information that appears on my tax return (such as my name or my income level) but that he obtained from another, non-tax source (such as a public document or, say, talking to me) then his act would not be a violation of the law you cited. That is not to say that such an act would necessarily be advisable, ethical, non-actionable, or even possible-- but it would not be a violation of the law you cited.
And as I noted in this thread, a Senator speaking on the Senate floor could escape prosecution even for reading directly from a confidential IRS document due to his constitutional immunities.