Curried Goats
Platinum Member
- Aug 28, 2021
- 26,061
- 9,612
There are no reports of him specifically threatening to kill anyone. Or any reports of him threatening everyone generally. He yelled loudly about not caring about going to prison. But even if he did threaten to kill people while that would be an assault (a verbal threat) that could possibly land him some criminal penalty, it is not a physical threat and therefore not a reasonable justification for Penny's own physical assault. Your own link states that self defense is only reasonable in the face of physical violence.1. The threat wasn't "being loud" the threat was saying that he was going to kill people
His history has no bearing on whether he physically assaulted Penny which is the only thing that would justify Penny's use of force.2. The self-defense defense should be easy to prove against a criminal with a long history of violent assaults
That's the differnce between manslaughter and murder.3. The choke hold was NOT intended to kill, it was intended to restrain.
They aren't physical assaults, they're verbal assaults. Feel free to shout back in self defense.4. As I proved above verbal threats are assaults. Mr. Neely's death threats were "specific and unambiguous".
Even physical assaults aren't equal. If someone simply pushes you while that is a physical assault it isn't one that justifies you pulling your gun and shooting that person as a result. Your actions wouldn't be considered reasonable to the threat you faced.5. Deadly force was used to stop threats of death from a violent criminal with a long rap sheet of violence.
Last edited: