MAGA Macho Man
Diamond Member
- Apr 19, 2022
- 8,987
- 20,854
- Thread starter
- #101
None thanks to the preemptive move by the heroic marine in the face of threatening individual, a negro.What people did he hurt on the subway?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
None thanks to the preemptive move by the heroic marine in the face of threatening individual, a negro.What people did he hurt on the subway?
They were fearful the rabid negro would harm them due to his threatening rants and gestures. They had no choice but to take preemptive measures against once again, a rabid negro!You don't know his rap sheet so it's not reasonable for a jury to conclude that that was a motivating factor.
I dont care enough. I said it again so you got the message regardless. Stop being a little bitch.
I dont care. Feel free to fuck around and find out. I'm not here to educate you, I'm here to point and laugh at you for me and other people's amusement.
No. Accomplices doesn't make your actions justified. That's stupid.
No they will not because having been violent previously doesn't justify violence now. That is another stupid argument. What matters in deciding whether any instance of self defense is justified are the particulars of that incident, nit previously unrelated events.1. His long rap sheet says he was a violent street thug. The jury will factor that in.
2. Can't prove your lie. fine.
It's you who hasn't proven your case.3. Can't prove your lie. fine.
One of them gets to try to argue that in court and he better have a better reason for why he took another man's life beyond, "Well two other people helped me do it." .....4. Innocent passengers together by chance protected themselves from a vicious street thug threatening to kill them. (not "accomplices")
He should use that defense in court. A hate crime modifier would certainly help....They were fearful the rabid negro would harm them due to his threatening rants and gestures. They had no choice but to take preemptive measures against once again, a rabid negro!
By the way, would you happen to be a negro yourself?
Would you by any chance happen to be a sub-human called a negro? If so, are you proud of your race?He should use that defense in court. A hate crime modifier would certainly help....
You Bingos are you own worst enemies.
So why did the ex-Marine fell he needed to choke him so? I guess that's a question for the jury.
You talk like a “sub-human” fascist or totally uncivilized racist pig. Go back to whatever zoo or tribal reservation you came from. Even MAGA politicians don’t speak your language. Your kind are not welcome among civilized citizens of our multi-ethnic and racially mixed Republic. Our country has enough problems as is. Most of us grew up pledging allegiance to “one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” You and your type are just poisonous trolls here.Would you by any chance happen to be a sub-human called a negro? If so, are you proud of your race?
1. Violent criminals do violence, its what they do. Mr. Neely has a long record of violence. He threatened violence, and was stopped by people protecting themselves.No they will not because having been violent previously doesn't justify violence now. That is another stupid argument. What matters in deciding whether any instance of self defense is justified are the particulars of that incident, not previously unrelated events.
One of them gets to try to argue that in court and he better have a better reason for why he took another man's life beyond, "Well two other people helped me do it." .....
I am proud and amused at your own ignorance.Would you by any chance happen to be a sub-human called a negro? If so, are you proud of your race?
If Penny is convicted he'll be the one with the violent criminal record. I guess that would make it OK for anyone to kill after he gets out is so much as shouts in public....1. Violent criminals do violence, its what they do. Mr. Neely has a long record of violence. He threatened violence, and was stopped by people protecting themselves.
It's those same witnesses who's statements landed Penny his charges.2. Mr. Penny has a train car full of witnesses who will say his actions were justified, to the point where two other men helped restrain the violent perp.
1. Penny won't be convicted. If he is he'll win on appeal. His defense fund will be way over $2,000,000, plus his best selling book tour. Its criminals vs Marines, no contest.If Penny is convicted he'll be the one with the violent criminal record. I guess that would make it OK for anyone to kill after he gets out is so much as shouts in public....
It's those same witnesses who's statements landed Penny his charges.
How many people have you claimed will win on appeal only for that to never actually happen?1. Penny won't be convicted. If he is he'll win on appeal. His defense fund will be way over $2,000,000, plus his best selling book tour. Its criminals vs Marines, no contest.
2. There was no grand jury, just that POS Bragg filing bullshit charges.
No clue. I'm blanking on who I supported that was found guilty.How many people have you claimed will win on appeal only for that to never actually happen?
If Mr. Penny believed Neely was an imminent threat his actions were justified.
You don't know how long it was held or how long it was needed.
I'd put the passengers in that train car on the jury. Their opinions are the ones that matter, they were there.
Neely was a POS thug who's live mattered to no one. Including himself. Until someone attached some $$$$ to his name.
No, he was strangled because some macho idiot decided to be a tough guy.He wasn't strangled because he didn't get help. He was subdued because he was scaring the passengers on the subway and wouldn't calm TF down.
You are free to eliminate or restrain a threat, that's why its called "self-defense". There are no rules, its life or death.Nope, you have to prove he was still a threat for the whole 15 minutes he was being strangled.
I'll use an analogy. If you attack me and I hit you, that's justified. If I keep hitting you after you are down, that is not. This is what got the cops who beat Rodney King in trouble, this is what got Jason van Dyke in Chicago in trouble.
They have it on videotape, and it was 15 minutes.
On the tape, you can hear some of the passengers say he was holding the guy too long. So I'm not sure he'd want them on the jury... or as witnesses, as some of them will be.
You are free to eliminate or restrain a threat, that's why its called "self-defense". There are no rules, its life or death.
I don't care if it was 30-minutes, the attacker was still attacking, the two other guys had to help restrain him. They couldn't release him. He was violent.
Clear self-defense. Let the lawyers hash it out in court. Mr. Penny has a lot of money to hire the best lawyers.
Nope. Not if he gets a change of venue.Dream on, this guy's going to prison for a long, long time.
Nope. Not if he gets a change of venue.
He defended himself and the other passengers from a violent criminal.No reason why he should. We learned from Simi Valley that you don't give racists all white juries.
And even if he did, if the evidence showed he strangled this man to death, then that is what the jury will find.