francoHFW
Diamond Member
- Sep 5, 2011
- 79,271
- 9,399
The secretary of state is allowed to delete personal emails. Clinton had five lawyers decide which ones were personal. there is no evidence of any wrongdoing that she would be trying to cover up. The whole thing is a joke, super duper.Yes actually. It’s standard operating procedure. The government doesn’t employ people to go through your personal records and pluck out what they think is relevant. Every employee is responsible for submitting this to the government. That’s how Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump do it.
So you are saying it is SOP that if the court orders you to turn over your computer for an investigation, it is perfectly ok to go to the trouble of permanently deleting all the data on the computer before turning it over? Why don't you try destroying evidence after it has been subpoenaed by the court and see what happens.
There was no court order. There was a congressional subpoena. The only person that deleted anything after the subpoena was issued stated they did so as their own decision. It had nothing to do with Clinton.
The smashing of phones and all the other deletions occurred before the subpoena was issued.
You really believe it had nothing to do with Clinton?
Is the smashing of phones considered an admission of guilt? Trump's actions have been seen as such.
What guilt would be admitted by smashing phones?
If Clinton had obstructed any attempt to investigate her, I would be making the same adverse inference (not guilt) that I make of Trump.
You don't consider deleting emails and smashing phones that could be used a evidence against her obstructing? Wow...not sure what to say.