Russia threatens to turn U.S. into "radioactive dust" while Obama plays golf

I'm sure you're a leading authority on "shoving things up your ass" but the fact remains that weakness invites aggression.

Reagan made it very clear that nobody could kick our ass and the U.S.S.R. had a massive nuclear arsenal back then. What happened? Reagan's clear message that he would not tolerate the existence of communism or the "evil empire" had the Soviets peeing down their pants and ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

So now that I've humiliated you yet again, what kind of tantrum and vulgar language do you have for us now junior?
The Soviet Union collapsed because they ran out of money.

That's what's going to happen to us if people keep listening to war-mongering assholes like you.

Or elect another community organizer with his hands on our wallet

-Geaux
 
He should care. The Soviets and Chinese are going to execute all of our leaders first. That is Communism 101. They will be going straight to the marxist professors, hollywood crowd, all those who helped them they will be first to get lined up for a firing squad. Yuri Bezmenov said the reason the communists execute the leaders of a country is to disable it from getting back on its feet - they kill all the marxists because they don't know their brand of communism and would resist - the others who know soviet style communism - they will kill because they have no intention of giving them what they promised. Its the history of communism nations. Look up what the communists do first when the tanks roll in. It's all there - just google it.
 
Obama could care less if we get nuked. Obviously...

-Geaux

I would expect he will do what the Israelis do and send the navy to remove the Iranian warship off our coastline. It would be a very bad move to allow that ship to sit 14 miles off our coastline because it would be capable of launching a super EMP at 26 miles over the USA. Israel would never allow it. I know that. ( Maritime borders are 14 miles off coast ) Akula Class II Submarine which is undetectable - ( one off texas coast was there for a month ) is also far too close to our borders and we need to examine this now that the cold war is back on. ( as if it ever stopped )
 
Last edited:
I'm sure you're a leading authority on "shoving things up your ass" but the fact remains that weakness invites aggression.

Reagan made it very clear that nobody could kick our ass and the U.S.S.R. had a massive nuclear arsenal back then. What happened? Reagan's clear message that he would not tolerate the existence of communism or the "evil empire" had the Soviets peeing down their pants and ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

So now that I've humiliated you yet again, what kind of tantrum and vulgar language do you have for us now junior?
The Soviet Union collapsed because they ran out of money.

That's what's going to happen to us if people keep listening to war-mongering assholes like you.

Billy, according to the most valuable KGB Defector America laid hold of - Anatoli Galitsin - there was no colllapse. It was all a ruse. The Soviets held onto everything valuable and dumped what they didn't need. Perestroika means deception. We were duped. Sad but true. Listen James Angle warned the CIA so many times about it they finally fired him rather than listen. Turned out the soviet moles Galitsin identified were not defectors but disinfo guys sent after Galitson defected from Russia to discredit him. Galitson warned that the goal of the Soviets was to defeat America. Their second goal was to rule the world. Nothing has changed. NOTE*** With America sending Russia 1 billion dollars per day every single day for years you can see the incentive they had to "play the game".. Putin should thank us for bankrolling his military.
Indeed...and it looks to me that we spent the so-called "Peace Dividend" a bit prematurely.
 
Jane%20Fonda%20Liberal%20Foreign%20policy_thumb%5B1%5D.jpg


...although bent-over doggie-style would be more like it.
 
The Soviet Union collapsed because they ran out of money.

That's what's going to happen to us if people keep listening to war-mongering assholes like you.

Billy, according to the most valuable KGB Defector America laid hold of - Anatoli Galitsin - there was no colllapse. It was all a ruse. The Soviets held onto everything valuable and dumped what they didn't need. Perestroika means deception. We were duped. Sad but true. Listen James Angle warned the CIA so many times about it they finally fired him rather than listen. Turned out the soviet moles Galitsin identified were not defectors but disinfo guys sent after Galitson defected from Russia to discredit him. Galitson warned that the goal of the Soviets was to defeat America. Their second goal was to rule the world. Nothing has changed. NOTE*** With America sending Russia 1 billion dollars per day every single day for years you can see the incentive they had to "play the game".. Putin should thank us for bankrolling his military.
Indeed...and it looks to me that we spent the so-called "Peace Dividend" a bit prematurely.

No question about it. I agree. It is better to make no move then to make the wrong one.
 
I'm sure you're a leading authority on "shoving things up your ass" but the fact remains that weakness invites aggression.

Reagan made it very clear that nobody could kick our ass and the U.S.S.R. had a massive nuclear arsenal back then. What happened? Reagan's clear message that he would not tolerate the existence of communism or the "evil empire" had the Soviets peeing down their pants and ended with the collapse of the Soviet Union.

So now that I've humiliated you yet again, what kind of tantrum and vulgar language do you have for us now junior?
The Soviet Union collapsed because they ran out of money.

That's what's going to happen to us if people keep listening to war-mongering assholes like you.

Or elect another community organizer with his hands on our wallet

-Geaux

III: How Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan Pulled off one of the Greatest Frauds Ever Perpetrated against the American People

Ronald Reagan and Alan Greenspan pulled off one of the greatest frauds ever perpetrated against the American people in the history of this great nation, and the underlying scam is still alive and well, more than a quarter century later. It represents the very foundation upon which the economic malpractice that led the nation to the great economic collapse of 2008 was built. Ronald Reagan was a cunning politician, but he didn’t know much about economics. Alan Greenspan was an economist, who had no reluctance to work with a politician on a plan that would further the cause of the right-wing goals that both he and President Reagan shared….

Exactly what Reagan did, with the help of Alan Greenspan. Consider the following sequence of events:

1) President Reagan appointed Greenspan as chairman of the 1982 National Commission on Social Security Reform (aka The Greenspan Commission)

2) The Greenspan Commission recommended a major payroll tax hike to generate Social Security surpluses for the next 30 years, in order to build up a large reserve in the trust fund that could be drawn down during the years after Social Security began running deficits.

3) The 1983 Social Security amendments enacted hefty increases in the payroll tax in order to generate large future surpluses.

4) As soon as the first surpluses began to role in, in 1985, the money was put into the general revenue fund and spent on other government programs. None of the surplus was saved or invested in anything. The surplus Social Security revenue, that was paid by working Americans, was used to replace the lost revenue from Reagan’s big income tax cuts that went primarily to the rich.

5) In 1987, President Reagan nominated Greenspan as the successor to Paul Volker as chairman of the Federal Reserve Board. Greenspan continued as Fed Chairman until January 31, 2006. (One can only speculate on whether the coveted Fed Chairmanship represented, at least in part, a payback for Greenspan’s role in initiating the Social Security surplus revenue.)

6) In 1990, Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan of New York, a member of the Greenspan Commission, and one of the strongest advocates the the 1983 legislation, became outraged when he learned that first Reagan, and then President George H.W. Bush used the surplus Social Security revenue to pay for other government programs instead of saving and investing it for the baby boomers. Moynihan locked horns with President Bush and proposed repealing the 1983 payroll tax hike. Moynihan’s view was that if the government could not keep its hands out of the Social Security cookie jar, the cookie jar should be emptied, so there would be no surplus Social Security revenue for the government to loot. President Bush would have no part of repealing the payroll tax hike. The “read-my-lips-no-new-taxes” president was not about to give up his huge slush fund.
http://http://ampedstatus.org/how-your-social-security-money-was-stolen-where-did-the-2-5-trillion-surplus-go/

Con integrity.....
Quote:
kwc57 said.
I want EVERYONE to succeed in life. That is the Republican and conservative motto.
The cons don't even want their own president of the United States to succeed, and have done everything they could to make him fail. That's how low you are.
 
"...The cons don't even want their own president of the United States to succeed, and have done everything they could to make him fail. That's how low you are."
Untrue.

It's just that - by Conservative standards - come January 20, 2017 - the date of the next Presidential Inauguration - the Office of President will have been vacant for eight years.

With a poorly credentialed and rookie placeholder figurehead as a seat-warmer.

You know - the one who was 'shellacked' in 2010 and lost the House.

Just like he's going to lose the Senate in about eight months.
 
Last edited:
Mr Putin is making Mr Obama look like a fool. With very little effort on his part.
Makes me sad for our country and the office of the presidency.

Right, why don't you move to Russia, then? You can peruse the daily paper for shirtless pics of Putin and send him love letters telling him how great he is.

;)

I don't understand the profoundly embarrassing man-love for Putin, but regardless; what exactly would YOU have done different?
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top