Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
not only did that 47% have things MUCH BETTER UNDER BUSH AND REPUBS; but 93% of American households are WORSE OFF UNDER OBAMA.
in fact the top 7% of the RICHEST Americans and ONLY that 7%; has seen an increase in Household Income
libs are losers who lie to themselves
Poor people can't succeed unless they are suffering.
Sister Simone Campbell called out Ryan on his budget."Though they spoke forcefully against the Ryan budget, House Democrats are, no doubt, privately pleased that nearly the entire Republican conference is on the record supporting a measure that would bump up defense spending by hundreds of billions of dollars over the next decade while simultaneously cutting the funding available for virtually everything else the federal government does, including Medicare, Medicaid, and a host of programs that support the poor.
The budget eliminates the federal deficit within 10 years through proposals that Ryan says would cut more than $5 trillion in spending over a decade. The single biggest cost savings that Ryan identifies is $2.1 trillion from the complete repeal of the Affordable Care Act."
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/gop-approves-ryan-budget-dems-182700767.html
Q. How can Paul Ryan, a good and devout Catholic, be so unchristian?
A.
You leftists need to stop saying that you are helping the poor.not only did that 47% have things MUCH BETTER UNDER BUSH AND REPUBS; but 93% of American households are WORSE OFF UNDER OBAMA.
in fact the top 7% of the RICHEST Americans and ONLY that 7%; has seen an increase in Household Income
libs are losers who lie to themselves
And you cons still believe that the reason things aren't better is because we are taxing the wealthy too much. You act as if Obama put an end to "trickle down" economics by massively increasing taxes on the wealthy. And then on top of that, you blame poor people for getting a little help because despite working a full-time job and a part-time job, they still aren't making enough to feed their kids.
Back to the ignore list for you. You are literally, too stupid to interact with.LOl, look at the desperate lefties
now we are STARVING KIDS
I've been paying to welfare, food stamps, wic, gawd I'm sure I have forget a few all my 40 years of my working life
but it's the same dirty politics every election...hell with Obama re-election campaign we were pushing grandmas over cliffs in wheelchairs....are they pathetic? we know they are desperate...but it's the same ole same ole...every election...dirt, smears, lies, they have no record to run on, the people can't stand Obama and his party...
You dumb shit. The rich have been stealing your money, not the poor.
You leftists need to stop saying that you are helping the poor.not only did that 47% have things MUCH BETTER UNDER BUSH AND REPUBS; but 93% of American households are WORSE OFF UNDER OBAMA.
in fact the top 7% of the RICHEST Americans and ONLY that 7%; has seen an increase in Household Income
libs are losers who lie to themselves
And you cons still believe that the reason things aren't better is because we are taxing the wealthy too much. You act as if Obama put an end to "trickle down" economics by massively increasing taxes on the wealthy. And then on top of that, you blame poor people for getting a little help because despite working a full-time job and a part-time job, they still aren't making enough to feed their kids.
You are not. Government assistance in any form but that which helps people become self sustaining is not help and is in fact, the worst form of cruelty.
In the upside down world of right wing loons, people are worse off for accepting government assistance as if the assistance came before the need.
Ignore why people need assistance, just mention they are worse off than before they accepted assistance. DO not question why they need assistance
YOU POOR BABBLING IDIOT. people are worse off because THINGS ARE WORSE under obama. and because obama has loosened welfare restrictions. we're not living in an upside down world leftard; you're living in DENIAL. THE TWO items are not mutually exclusive. ....... under obama there are more needy AND more people gaming the system
Indeed and disability
-Geaux
SSA: Disability Recipients Soar, Funding Nearly Depleted Under Obama
Tuesday, 17 Dec 2013 05:37 PM
By Jennifer G. Hickey
The number of Americans receiving Social Security disability payments has increased 20 percent since President Barack Obama took office and the influx of new recipients has pushed the program close to insolvency.
The annual deficit in the Social Security Disability Trust Fund hit $31.49 billion in fiscal 2013 and the remaining balance of $100.49 billion in the fund will be depleted by 2016, the Social Security Administration predicts.
SSA: Disability Recipients Soar, Funding Nearly Depleted Under Obama
I've been reading along, taking notes, and highlighting text of Ryan's "War of Poverty" document. I was going to wait until I got through the whole thing before posting a summary. The first part is a page or two on each safety net program; short description, pros and cons, and total cost. I just got to page 85, National School Lunch Program. The document states that, "The academic literature suggests that the NSLP contributes to childhood obesity, but overall findings are inconclusive." The titles of the two comments in the pros and cons are "NSPL contributes to obesity among schoolchildren." and "Participating low-income girls see an increase in body mass index." As someone who got one filling meal a day that I ate with relish thanks to NSLP I would like to say something to a certain someone who supports tax cuts for the top tax bracket, I am not saying who, I do hope he does not take this the wrong way. I would like to say, "Please go fuck yourself."
The right just loves starving kids though. LyinRyan considers hunger a good thing - even though he was also helped by public programs.
The good news is that every time that that serial liar opens his mouth, the R loses votes.
The bad news is their gerrymandering and stealing votes will probably give them some wins.
I've been reading along, taking notes, and highlighting text of Ryan's "War of Poverty" document. I was going to wait until I got through the whole thing before posting a summary. The first part is a page or two on each safety net program; short description, pros and cons, and total cost. I just got to page 85, National School Lunch Program. The document states that, "The academic literature suggests that the NSLP contributes to childhood obesity, but overall findings are inconclusive." The titles of the two comments in the pros and cons are "NSPL contributes to obesity among schoolchildren." and "Participating low-income girls see an increase in body mass index." As someone who got one filling meal a day that I ate with relish thanks to NSLP I would like to say something to a certain someone who supports tax cuts for the top tax bracket, I am not saying who, I do hope he does not take this the wrong way. I would like to say, "Please go fuck yourself."
The right just loves starving kids though. LyinRyan considers hunger a good thing - even though he was also helped by public programs.
The good news is that every time that that serial liar opens his mouth, the R loses votes.
The bad news is their gerrymandering and stealing votes will probably give them some wins.
oh shut, I was poor in my childhood, we got charity boxes of government rations, like cheese, bread, flour, etc....and we survived (which we were frikken grateful for) and at others times we had to cut back on some things..THAT'S CALL LIFE
no you were probably born with a silver spoon in your mouth it's no wonder you accuse people of wanting to stave people..it's about a low as you can crawl
being a liberal is easy, you can stand on a soap box and say and post thread like this, because if any on you had any honor you know we are not looking to starve people...but as for one penny be cut from any entitlement and this is YOUr UGLY SPEW
from the conservative Heritage Foundation
Why I do not trust conservatives when it comes to criticism of Obamacare
Heritage Foundation: 'Mandate All Households To Obtain Adequate Insurance' | ThinkProgress