eagleseven
Quod Erat Demonstrandum
Source?The WHO is the originator of it, as a matter of fact. What, you're surprised to hear that WHO is not viewed as the ultimate arbiter of all unbiased, objective wisdom?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Source?The WHO is the originator of it, as a matter of fact. What, you're surprised to hear that WHO is not viewed as the ultimate arbiter of all unbiased, objective wisdom?
I note with interest that you continue to think "Well, you're just stupid, you're crazy, I have lots of funny YouTube clips I can use to say you're stupid and crazy" is a valid refutation of anything.
I realize this probably works in the junior high circles you normally frequent. With me, it just confirms for me that you are unable to discuss the topic on any sort of facts, and therefore need to run, hide, ridicule, and attempt to silence to hide your lack of debating skill.
There is nothing to debate, you're insane. To actually say we would be debating to be saying your points have merit. Your points have the same merit to me as the Holocaust Deniers do.
It would make me feel very sad to know that you are so pathetic that you have to derive a sense of significance and meaning from people responding on a message board . . . if I cared enough about your existence on the planet to feel sad.
But good for you that my boredom has managed to provide you with some self-esteem. Consider that my charity work for the week.
People to Avoid QuestioningUh huh. "Everyone knows it", so there's no point in ever questioning what "everyone knows". Disagreeing is just insane, because "everyone knows" it's true. Therefore, it's never necessary to question what "everyone knows", because "everyone knows" it.
The difference, of course, is that Holocaust deniers are flying in the face of evidence. I, on the other hand, am presenting the evidence, and YOU are the one ignoring it to proclaim what you "know" to be true. And I'd bet good money that you "know" it without ever having reviewed a single piece of evidence supporting what you "know". You just "know".
On the other hand, a man contracting germs from a woman's body would pretty require that he have an open wound on his genitals for the germs to pass through. A man with an open wound on his genitals probably doesn't feel much like having sex, and the woman probably isn't going to be all that turned on by it, either.
is anyone gonna post proof their is or is not a gay gene?
put of shut up, both of y'all
Really?There is NO gay gene or genetic predisposition that makes a person a sodomite.
It is a choice.
Why Gays Don't Go Extinct | LiveScience Evidence for maternally inherited factors favouring male homosexuality and promoting female fecundity Proceedings B Gay Men in Twin Study - The New York Times Male sexuality may be decided in the womb - life - 26 June 2006 - New Scientist A linkage between DNA markers on the X chromosome and male sexual orientation -- Hamer et al. 261 (5119): 321 -- Science The Real Story on Gay Genes | Sex & Gender | DISCOVER Magazine
See also:
Homosexual Activity Among Animals Stirs Debate Homosexual behavior in animals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Homosexuality: Against Nature? Homosexuality in Nature Homosexuality: Nature or Nurture in AllPsych Journal Homosexuality: Nature, Nurture and Compassion Nature versus Nurture: Homosexuality's Link to Biology and Society | Serendip's Exchange Nature's Homosexuality - Homosexuality, as natural as heterosexual sex - Softpedia Origin of Homosexuality? Britons, Canadians Say Nature The Natural "Crime Against Nature": Homosexual Behaviors In Animals Understanding Homosexuality: "Nature Vs. Nurture" Revisited - Associated Content List of animals displaying homosexual behavior - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Evolution myths: Natural selection cannot explain homosexuality - life - 16 April 2008 - New Scientist
What do you ultimately conclude about these documents?
.That there is evidence supporting genetic and/or prenatal factors in the determination of sexual preference.What do you ultimately conclude about these documents?
It's already known that prenatal conditions can determine sex. XY females are an example of this. It follows, and the evidence also suggests, that more than simply physical sex may be determined or influenced by environmental factors in the womb, as well.
It seems women are getting aids predominently from heterosexual activities, and men are getting it more from homosexual activity.
I dont think aids is a gay or straight disease, and its misguided to blame gays for aids.
we need a cure, even if 99 our of 100 gays were getting the disease, because we should value human life, period
On a related noteSo your position is that since God didn't make us into mindless puppets and gave us the ability to make bad choices, that means that He must approve of any and every action we can take? You figure God is a big proponent of things like murder, rape, and child abuse, do you?
Have you always been a peabrained dumbfuck, or did you have a special operation just for this occasion?
Going for the gold tonight? Saying that Homosexuality is a bad choice. Comparing Homosexuality to Murder, Rape, and Child Abuse?
If one is a carrier, and they kiss shortly after that persons brushed his/her teeth, the small amounts of blood present (of which they might not even be aware) can allow transfer. Also, if one is a secretor. This is far less likely, but also possible.On the other hand, a man contracting germs from a woman's body would pretty require that he have an open wound on his genitals for the germs to pass through. A man with an open wound on his genitals probably doesn't feel much like having sex, and the woman probably isn't going to be all that turned on by it, either.
Shaving your pubic hair creates plenty of micro-cuts that are large enough to allow the transmission of HIV. If both partners regularly shave, they are putting themselves at a greater risk for all viral STIs.
People to Avoid QuestioningUh huh. "Everyone knows it", so there's no point in ever questioning what "everyone knows". Disagreeing is just insane, because "everyone knows" it's true. Therefore, it's never necessary to question what "everyone knows", because "everyone knows" it.
The difference, of course, is that Holocaust deniers are flying in the face of evidence. I, on the other hand, am presenting the evidence, and YOU are the one ignoring it to proclaim what you "know" to be true. And I'd bet good money that you "know" it without ever having reviewed a single piece of evidence supporting what you "know". You just "know".
1. The IRS
2. The kindly officer who says you were pushing 60 in a school zone.
3. The epidemiologists and microbiologists protecting your ass from lethal pathogens.
On the other hand, a man contracting germs from a woman's body would pretty require that he have an open wound on his genitals for the germs to pass through. A man with an open wound on his genitals probably doesn't feel much like having sex, and the woman probably isn't going to be all that turned on by it, either.
you forgot about that thing called the urethra.
you don't need an open cut to transmit hiv. it is just one of several mechanisms.
here's one, for example:
Langerhans cell - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I disagree, everything we do has an effect on others.
How we interact with family, friends, and even strangers, has an effect on us and them
How does Sunni Man receiving a sexual favor from another man effect your life?
It seems women are getting aids predominently from heterosexual activities, and men are getting it more from homosexual activity.
I dont think aids is a gay or straight disease, and its misguided to blame gays for aids.
we need a cure, even if 99 our of 100 gays were getting the disease, because we should value human life, period
They're working on it
Researchers identify compound that could prevent HIV transmission - Academic Health Center, University of Minnesota Researchers Induce HIV-neutralizing Antibodies That Recognize HIV-1 Envelop Study finds potential way to make an AIDS vaccine | Reuters For the First Time Ever, HIV Vaccines Show Promise in Preventing Infections | 80beats | Discover Magazine
do they know how you feel about their homosexuality?
does it cause any friction?
curious
I bet you're curious. It sure would explain this thread.
On the other hand, a man contracting germs from a woman's body would pretty require that he have an open wound on his genitals for the germs to pass through. A man with an open wound on his genitals probably doesn't feel much like having sex, and the woman probably isn't going to be all that turned on by it, either.
Shaving your pubic hair creates plenty of micro-cuts that are large enough to allow the transmission of HIV. If both partners regularly shave, they are putting themselves at a greater risk for all viral STIs.
Quite true, but very, VERY few men shave their pubic hair.