San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...

[theDoctorisIn]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

You seem to be very hung up on the words "assault rifle".

The guns were modified to remove California's weird mandated magazine lock - both guns used, even with their modifications, would have been completely legal in any state other than California

 

[M14 Shooter]

Another example of your ignorance and/or dishonesty.
You have no idea if those guns are 'assault weapons' or not

 

[theDoctorisIn]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

Those weapons weren't legal. They were full-auto.....banned as far as I know.

NFA weapons are indeed illgeal in CA.
I did not hear that they were full-auto, however.

From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.

Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.

 

[M14 Shooter]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

You seem to be very hung up on the words "assault rifle".

I haven't used the words 'assault rifle'.

The guns were modified to remove California's weird mandated magazine lock

Yes, These rifles, when purchased, had fixed magazines, and thus were not 'assault weapons'
Once modified, they had detachable magazines, and thus illegal 'assault weapons' under CA law.

Again: betting you wont hear this in the news.

 

[depotoo]

Assault rifles cannot legally be given/transferred to another owner in Ca. Also, from the huff-

The rifles were both illegally modified, Meredith Davis, a spokeswoman for the ATF, told The Huffington Post on Friday.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

You seem to be very hung up on the words "assault rifle".

I haven't used the words 'assault rifle'.

The guns were modified to remove California's weird mandated magazine lock

Yes, These rifles, when purchased, had fixed magazines, and thus were not 'assault weapons'
Once modified, they had detachable magazines, and thus illegal 'assault weapons' under CA law.

Again: betting you wont hear this in the news.

How do you think I found out about it?

It's already all over the news.

 

[Ravi]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

 

[mudwhistle]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

Those weapons weren't legal. They were full-auto.....banned as far as I know.

Neither rifle was "full-auto".

 

[M14 Shooter]

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

You seem to be very hung up on the words "assault rifle".

I haven't used the words 'assault rifle'.

The guns were modified to remove California's weird mandated magazine lock

Yes, These rifles, when purchased, had fixed magazines, and thus were not 'assault weapons'
Once modified, they had detachable magazines, and thus illegal 'assault weapons' under CA law.
Again: betting you wont hear this in the news.

How do you think I found out about it?
It's already all over the news.

I searched it as soon as you mentioned it.
Have a link?

 

[M14 Shooter]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Probably legally purchased also. If they were modified to only hold one magazine and not take it out that would require removing something not adding something.

 

[mudwhistle]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

Those weapons weren't legal. They were full-auto.....banned as far as I know.

NFA weapons are indeed illgeal in CA.
I did not hear that they were full-auto, however.

From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.

Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.

I don't use Google.

I'd rather Bing.

Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Another example of your ignorance and/or dishonesty.
You have no idea if those guns are 'assault weapons' or not

Well, you are supposed to fill us in on how much of that on the wall is supposedly banned in CA? They sure as hell don't look banned now do they?

You could start a war with that shit so, do tell?

 

[depotoo]

"The rifles were both illegally modified, Meredith Davis, a spokeswoman for the ATF, told The Huffington Post on Friday."

It was in the huffington post today-

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?

 

[M14 Shooter]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Probably legally purchased also. If they were modified to only hold one magazine and not take it out that would require removing something not adding something.

You'll have to excuse Ravi -- all that is way above his pay grade.

 

[Godboy]

Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.

In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.

So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?

You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.

 

[Ravi]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?

No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.

How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?

http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/

Those weapons weren't legal. They were full-auto.....banned as far as I know.

NFA weapons are indeed illgeal in CA.
I did not hear that they were full-auto, however.

From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.

Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.

I don't use Google.

I'd rather Bing.

Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.

That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.

In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.

So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?

You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.

Tell us all about it, and how the guns they had were banned but still purchased legally? Go...

 

[theDoctorisIn]

has anyone seen the magazines

all the pictures i have seen

show the rifles pistols and ammunition

but no magazines

why is that

also are those long rifles CA legal

They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.

Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.

Where did they get the parts to modify them?

Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?

No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.

The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.