Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is just another example of a moron talking about things he doesn't understand. He is SOOOO sure those are assault rifles, but that's because he's a fucktard.
Another example of your ignorance and/or dishonesty.
You have no idea if those guns are 'assault weapons' or not
The weapons they bought had a fixed magazine,No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.Where did they get the parts to modify them?Ah.has anyone seen the magazines
all the pictures i have seen
show the rifles pistols and ammunition
but no magazines
why is that
also are those long rifles CA legal
They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.
Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?
San Bern shooters used legally purchased guns, but...
... 'assault weapons' are banned in CA.
How were these guns legal?
How would banning 'assault weapons', as suggested today by the White House, when they are already illegal stop this incident?
http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...fornia-attack/
I note you have yet to link a source. Weren't you DEMANDING sources in the last little go around and rejecting those you did not like? Must be nice to just ignore that when it is your turn.I don't use Google.From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.NFA weapons are indeed illgeal in CA.Those weapons weren't legal. They were full-auto.....banned as far as I know.
I did not hear that they were full-auto, however.
Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.
I'd rather Bing.
Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.
That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?
Yes, RGS answered my question.No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.Where did they get the parts to modify them?Ah.They were "CA compliant" when they were purchased, but they were modified.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.
Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?
The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.
As i said: Ignorant and/or dishonest.This is just another example of a moron talking about things he doesn't understand. He is SOOOO sure those are assault rifles, but that's because he's a fucktard.
Another example of your ignorance and/or dishonesty.
You have no idea if those guns are 'assault weapons' or not
Explain it to us, in detail. How do perfectly legal guns, which they used, suddenly become illegal?This is just another example of a moron talking about things he doesn't understand. He is SOOOO sure those are assault rifles, but that's because he's a fucktard.
Another example of your ignorance and/or dishonesty.
You have no idea if those guns are 'assault weapons' or not
Blame it on the inherent stupidity of 'assault weapons' bans.Yes, RGS answered my question.No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.Where did they get the parts to modify them?Ah.
So the guns, originally not 'assault weapons', were purchased legally, but then illegally modified into 'assault weapons'
Pretty sure this won't make the news.
Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?
The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.
If they are so easily modified though why are they legal to begin with? Makes no sense.
Oh my god you're stupid. It becomes illegal after making it fully automatic, putting a bayonet lug on it, putting a flash suppressor on it, putting an illegal 30 round mag in it, etc.Tell us all about it, and how the guns they had were banned but still purchased legally? Go...You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.
In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.
By modification then making them illegal.Tell us all about it, and how the guns they had were banned but still purchased legally? Go...You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.
In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.
Sounds more like it needs to be extended.Blame it on the inherent stupidity of 'assault weapons' bans.Yes, RGS answered my question.No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.Where did they get the parts to modify them?
Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?
The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.
If they are so easily modified though why are they legal to begin with? Makes no sense.
I note you have yet to link a source. Weren't you DEMANDING sources in the last little go around and rejecting those you did not like? Must be nice to just ignore that when it is your turn.I don't use Google.From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.NFA weapons are indeed illgeal in CA.
I did not hear that they were full-auto, however.
Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.
I'd rather Bing.
Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.
That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?
:roll:Sounds more like it needs to be extended.Blame it on the inherent stupidity of 'assault weapons' bans.Yes, RGS answered my question.The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.
Do you have any idea how they modified them into illegal 'assault weapons'?
If they are so easily modified though why are they legal to begin with? Makes no sense.
Slowly for us barbarians, explain why when you post "use google" that is ok, but when one of us does it you INSIST on a link?I note you have yet to link a source. Weren't you DEMANDING sources in the last little go around and rejecting those you did not like? Must be nice to just ignore that when it is your turn.I don't use Google.From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.
Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.
I'd rather Bing.
Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.
That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?
Take your pick:
2 Guns in San Bernardino Massacre Bought in San Diego: ATF
Rifles Used in San Bernardino Shooting Illegal Under State Law
Were the San Bernardino Shooters' Assault Rifles Modified to Thwart California Gun Laws?
As I said before, you're welcome to use your Google, you'll find hundreds more.
Hmmm, well for starters, their guns weren't full-auto, so therefore not banned.Oh my god you're stupid. It becomes illegal after making it fully automatic, putting a bayonet lug on it, putting a flash suppressor on it, putting an illegal 30 mag in it, etc.Tell us all about it, and how the guns they had were banned but still purchased legally? Go...You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.
In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.
Thank youI note you have yet to link a source. Weren't you DEMANDING sources in the last little go around and rejecting those you did not like? Must be nice to just ignore that when it is your turn.I don't use Google.From listening to witnesses....they heard rapid gunfire....which usually means full-auto.
Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.
I'd rather Bing.
Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.
That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?
Take your pick:
2 Guns in San Bernardino Massacre Bought in San Diego: ATF
Rifles Used in San Bernardino Shooting Illegal Under State Law
Were the San Bernardino Shooters' Assault Rifles Modified to Thwart California Gun Laws?
As I said before, you're welcome to use your Google, you'll find hundreds more.
By extend I meant make it so the law also bans easily modified weapons (those that can be made into true assault weapons).:roll:Sounds more like it needs to be extended.Blame it on the inherent stupidity of 'assault weapons' bans.Yes, RGS answered my question.The modifications they did involve removing parts, not adding new parts.No, that's why I asked you where they got the parts to modify them.
If they are so easily modified though why are they legal to begin with? Makes no sense.
Of course it does.
Point out a glaring example of how the law is a failure, and you want to "extend" it.
Slowly for us barbarians, explain why when you post "use google" that is ok, but when one of us does it you INSIST on a link?I note you have yet to link a source. Weren't you DEMANDING sources in the last little go around and rejecting those you did not like? Must be nice to just ignore that when it is your turn.I don't use Google.Plenty of information about the weapons used has been released. None of the 4 guns used was "full auto". Use your Google.
I'd rather Bing.
Btw, all the lies coming out of this administration leads me not to trust anything unless it's under oath....and not even then sometimes.
That's a pretty handy excuse there, isn't it?
Take your pick:
2 Guns in San Bernardino Massacre Bought in San Diego: ATF
Rifles Used in San Bernardino Shooting Illegal Under State Law
Were the San Bernardino Shooters' Assault Rifles Modified to Thwart California Gun Laws?
As I said before, you're welcome to use your Google, you'll find hundreds more.
Oh my god you're stupid. It becomes illegal after making it fully automatic, putting a bayonet lug on it, putting a flash suppressor on it, putting an illegal 30 round mag in it, etc.Tell us all about it, and how the guns they had were banned but still purchased legally? Go...You are shockingly ignorant. Clearly you don't know what is and isn't an assault rifle. Here's a hint... it has nothing to do with how it looks asthetically.So, a bunch of those guns on the wall of this CA gun shop are illegal to sell there? Do tell?Link showing they are banned? Oh right, you have no clue, of course.
In California you can't legally have any clips in excess of ten rounds maximum. So, they were clearly in violation. One news report said they had 4,500 rounds between the three shooters plus pipe bombs which are also illegal in California.
