williepete
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #21
Bring on the class warfare.
'Cause that worked out so well all the other times.
![179_china_cruelty.jpg](/proxy.php?image=http%3A%2F%2Fharunyahya.com%2Fimage%2Fcommunist_China_s_policy_of_oppression_in_East_Turkestan%2F179_china_cruelty.jpg&hash=1f96c6ddb713a409fc941cd32a0c3167)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bring on the class warfare.
Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
You don't think there is a real issue with money management when you have been making six figures for 20 years and you have a whole 400k in assets?Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
He has been in the US Congress since 1991 and earns $174,000 a year in salary.....plus tens of thousands more in "allowances" for expenses. He should have a lot more than 460K..... He doesn't know how to handle money.
As a socialist .. it always amazes me to listen to unlearned people who think all socialists are poor. :0)
He is getting on in age, low 70s?i stole this from wapo, but it's funny.
Sanders's net worth is about $460,000 -- pretty low for a senator but probably not bad for a socialist..
Your online guide to Bernie Sanders - The Washington Post
i like this guide to online feature.
so as a vermonter i'm curious what the country thinks. he's a force of nature and with American liberal politics marching us toward the euroismic. might be good timing.
and unlike hillary he does talk to/acknowledge the media, but he doesn't dress like chairman mao.
the fifty shades thing, this is the first i've heard of it.
the "probably" not bad for a socialist is what makes the line funny.
hmmm, perhaps he donates to Charity, anyone thought of that yet?Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
He has been in the US Congress since 1991 and earns $174,000 a year in salary.....plus tens of thousands more in "allowances" for expenses. He should have a lot more than 460K..... He doesn't know how to handle money.
Alot of speculation and judgement here, very little facts. Based on what has been presented nobody has any idea whether or not....
-His net worth is calculated somewhat low due to recently (past few years) purchasing a home. The outstanding mortgage would count against his net worth.
-He has spent his life making extraordinarily generous charitable contributions
-He has already been funneling his wealth to his children and other heirs by transferring ownership of various assets
-He has chosen to use his wealth in life to support his children so that they can save and build their own wealth, in lieu of a larger taxable inheritance
-He has spent his own wealth to finance his campaigns instead of accepting contributions from special interests.
Stevens was embroiled in a federal corruption trial as he ran for re-election to the Senate. He was found guilty, and eight days later was narrowly defeated at the polls.[5] Stevens is the most senior U.S. Senator to have ever lost a reelection bid. However, prior to sentencing, the indictment was dismissed—effectively vacating the conviction—when a Justice Department probe found evidence of gross prosecutorial misconduct.[6]
Yep. I can't think of a person who is more opposite from Hillary, he's a principled guy, and he gets five points in my book just for showing up.Actually...
If all he's managed to round up is $460K, it might indicate he is no where near the corrupt scumbag almost every other senator is.
Just sayin' cuz his politics are repulsive, but if he sticks to his principles I have to respect that.
Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Good luck with that...Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Do women always think men want their wallets raped by women?Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Common men think women want to be raped?
thats alot for a Vermont resident, how much money does the state have? 4.5 million?Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Common men think women want to be raped?
hmmm, perhaps he donates to Charity, anyone thought of that yet?Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
He has been in the US Congress since 1991 and earns $174,000 a year in salary.....plus tens of thousands more in "allowances" for expenses. He should have a lot more than 460K..... He doesn't know how to handle money.
Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Common men think women want to be raped?
hmmm, perhaps he donates to Charity, anyone thought of that yet?Only to elitist snobby people is it bad that he has only amassed $460 thousand. Anyone who has amassed millions has zero, zero business being in the white house. How is someone who is worth a ton of money going to relate to the average person who will die with ALOT less than that amassed. Big money controls this country at the morbid expense of the working poor. You got billions, you surely didn't get them without being shrewd and underhanded. Bring on the class warfare.
He has been in the US Congress since 1991 and earns $174,000 a year in salary.....plus tens of thousands more in "allowances" for expenses. He should have a lot more than 460K..... He doesn't know how to handle money.
Doubtful, if he did he and the DNC WashingtonCompost be advertising it to the whole world. They'd be, oh look at that Democrat/Socialist person. He's such a good person
Come on GOP....lets hear it for the common man
Common men think women want to be raped?
40 years ago?