Sarah Palin being considered for Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Oh, look, you're lying again. Who could have seen that coming.

Despite your lie that pollsters didn't poll the popular vote, here's a hundred or so polls indicating the Hillary was expected win the popular vote by a few percentage points....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

Do you ever stop lying?

Ever??


Do you ever stop misquoting me and others? I never said that pollsters did not create polls on the PV. They did, and they favored HRC. But the PV is a meaningless statistic. We don't use the PV to elect presidents. If you don't like that, get a constitutional amendment through both houses of congress and then get 38 states to ratify it.

YES, hilly may have won the popular vote because neither of them campaigned in California or New York-------------it means nothing. They both ran their campaigns to win the EC, and she lost. Get over it, you ran a terrible corrupt candidate and she got her ass kicked in the only vote that matters.
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Name those pollsters. You can't.

Are you aware that no major national pollster even polled Pennsylvania?
 
Oh, look, you're lying again. Who could have seen that coming.

Despite your lie that pollsters didn't poll the popular vote, here's a hundred or so polls indicating the Hillary was expected win the popular vote by a few percentage points....

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein

Do you ever stop lying?

Ever??


Do you ever stop misquoting me and others? I never said that pollsters did not create polls on the PV. They did, and they favored HRC. But the PV is a meaningless statistic. We don't use the PV to elect presidents. If you don't like that, get a constitutional amendment through both houses of congress and then get 38 states to ratify it.

YES, hilly may have won the popular vote because neither of them campaigned in California or New York-------------it means nothing. They both ran their campaigns to win the EC, and she lost. Get over it, you ran a terrible corrupt candidate and she got her ass kicked in the only vote that matters.
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Tell us more about Trump winning the popular vote.

lol
 
Do you ever stop misquoting me and others? I never said that pollsters did not create polls on the PV. They did, and they favored HRC. But the PV is a meaningless statistic. We don't use the PV to elect presidents. If you don't like that, get a constitutional amendment through both houses of congress and then get 38 states to ratify it.

YES, hilly may have won the popular vote because neither of them campaigned in California or New York-------------it means nothing. They both ran their campaigns to win the EC, and she lost. Get over it, you ran a terrible corrupt candidate and she got her ass kicked in the only vote that matters.
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Name those pollsters. You can't.

Are you aware that no major national pollster even polled Pennsylvania?

USA today
quinipiac (sp)
CBS

just to name 3, but I will not play your juvenile games, anyone who was alive during the last 6 months knows what the pollsters were claiming.
 
Do you ever stop misquoting me and others? I never said that pollsters did not create polls on the PV. They did, and they favored HRC. But the PV is a meaningless statistic. We don't use the PV to elect presidents. If you don't like that, get a constitutional amendment through both houses of congress and then get 38 states to ratify it.

YES, hilly may have won the popular vote because neither of them campaigned in California or New York-------------it means nothing. They both ran their campaigns to win the EC, and she lost. Get over it, you ran a terrible corrupt candidate and she got her ass kicked in the only vote that matters.
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Tell us more about Trump winning the popular vote.

lol


Tell us more about HRC winning the EC

lol
 
I saw it earlier on MSNBC. How do veterans feel about that possibility? So far, this is the only link I've found:

The Immoral Minority: Reports say that Sarah Palin is under consideration to join Trump's cabinet as the Secretary of Veteran's Affairs. Update!

That would be OK with me. I think she would kick ass and take names and straighten the VA out.

Don't lie. Don't pretend anyone will believe you actually think. Oh, and when and where did you serve?

I sure do wish I was a deep thinker like you.

Born and raised in Texas, makes that wish an impossible dream.
 
I saw it earlier on MSNBC. How do veterans feel about that possibility? So far, this is the only link I've found:

The Immoral Minority: Reports say that Sarah Palin is under consideration to join Trump's cabinet as the Secretary of Veteran's Affairs. Update!

That would be OK with me. I think she would kick ass and take names and straighten the VA out.

Don't lie. Don't pretend anyone will believe you actually think. Oh, and when and where did you serve?

I sure do wish I was a deep thinker like you.

Born and raised in Texas, makes that wish an impossible dream.

Same here. Houston is my birthplace.
 
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Tell us more about Trump winning the popular vote.

lol


Tell us more about HRC winning the EC

lol

I never claimed she did. You still claim Trump won the popular vote. You're retarded.
 
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Name those pollsters. You can't.

Are you aware that no major national pollster even polled Pennsylvania?

USA today
quinipiac (sp)
CBS

just to name 3, but I will not play your juvenile games, anyone who was alive during the last 6 months knows what the pollsters were claiming.

Three links then to those polls where those pollsters state for the record that Hillary could not lose.

Where are they?
 
Do you ever stop misquoting me and others? I never said that pollsters did not create polls on the PV. They did, and they favored HRC. But the PV is a meaningless statistic. We don't use the PV to elect presidents. If you don't like that, get a constitutional amendment through both houses of congress and then get 38 states to ratify it.

YES, hilly may have won the popular vote because neither of them campaigned in California or New York-------------it means nothing. They both ran their campaigns to win the EC, and she lost. Get over it, you ran a terrible corrupt candidate and she got her ass kicked in the only vote that matters.
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Tell us more about Trump winning the popular vote.

lol
A more accurate perspective is Hillary losing the popular vote with only 48.2% of the vote.

The vast majority of her votes were from high density, Left coast states. If your version of democracy is to have a few high-population states dictate to the rest of the 40-45 states who runs the country, then let's reconsider dividing the US into three nations: People's Republic of the West Coast, Middle America and the People's Republic of the Northeast. Guess which one has most of the guns and percentage of military volunteers?

vanderbei-examples-600.jpg

B781D9F5D0E30F338496ACBF91B021B4.gif

E8F05D884C7E78E45A200DC953ED3854.gif
 
get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Name those pollsters. You can't.

Are you aware that no major national pollster even polled Pennsylvania?

USA today
quinipiac (sp)
CBS

just to name 3, but I will not play your juvenile games, anyone who was alive during the last 6 months knows what the pollsters were claiming.

Three links then to those polls where those pollsters state for the record that Hillary could not lose.

Where are they?
Are you denying that most polls predicted Hillary would win albeit by a small margin?
 
You're as dumb as your fellow yahoo.

I never said the popular vote was meaningful. But it does exist and the polls accurately predicted Hillary would win. So claiming now the polls got it wrong is beyond stupid and venturing into conservatism.


get your head out of Hillary's ass. The pollsters said she would win the ELECTION. They lied, or if you want to say it nicely, they polled the wrong sample.

No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Tell us more about Trump winning the popular vote.

lol
A more accurate perspective is Hillary losing the popular vote with only 48.2% of the vote.

The vast majority of her votes were from high density, Left coast states. If your version of democracy is to have a few high-population states dictate to the rest of the 40-45 states who runs the country, then let's reconsider dividing the US into three nations: People's Republic of the West Coast, Middle America and the People's Republic of the Northeast. Guess which one has most of the guns and percentage of military volunteers?

vanderbei-examples-600.jpg

B781D9F5D0E30F338496ACBF91B021B4.gif

E8F05D884C7E78E45A200DC953ED3854.gif

You're retarded. Hillary got over 2 million more votes than Trump. That wins you every election in the US except the presidency, because we have a weird, undemocratic way of selecting presidents.
 
No they did not. The pollsters doing national polling were measuring the national popular vote.

Every one of their final polls except one had Clinton winning the popular vote.


Geez, its early morning and I have to start educating you first thing before my second cup of coffee is gone.

Those same pollsters said that there was no path for Trump to get 270 EC votes (based on their flawed state by state PV polls). They were either wrong in both cases or they skewed the polls to make it look like the hildebeast could not lose.

They lied and you bought into it. What does that say about YOU?

Name those pollsters. You can't.

Are you aware that no major national pollster even polled Pennsylvania?

USA today
quinipiac (sp)
CBS

just to name 3, but I will not play your juvenile games, anyone who was alive during the last 6 months knows what the pollsters were claiming.

Three links then to those polls where those pollsters state for the record that Hillary could not lose.

Where are they?
Are you denying that most polls predicted Hillary would win albeit by a small margin?

They called the popular vote for Hillary Clinton, and she won it. A national poll is not an electoral vote poll.

Here are the final national polls:

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton

You show me which one is counting electoral votes.
 
Your charts are irrelevant....
Translation: You are correct, DW. Go fuck yourself and your charts. All that matters is the popular vote. If most Americans are for or against something, then they should dictate their choice to all other Americans.

If the popular vote for President is good for the nation, then why not apply that to everything else when it comes to major decisions? Are you really sure you want to set that precedent?
 
I saw it earlier on MSNBC. How do veterans feel about that possibility? So far, this is the only link I've found:

The Immoral Minority: Reports say that Sarah Palin is under consideration to join Trump's cabinet as the Secretary of Veteran's Affairs. Update!

That would be OK with me. I think she would kick ass and take names and straighten the VA out.

Don't lie. Don't pretend anyone will believe you actually think. Oh, and when and where did you serve?

I sure do wish I was a deep thinker like you.

Born and raised in Texas, makes that wish an impossible dream.

Same here. Houston is my birthplace.

And the home of my in-laws.
 

Forum List

Back
Top