Sarah Palin resigning as Governor of Alaska

i havent researched what a "neolib" is

Who needs research ... look at the blind Obama followers ... :eusa_whistle:
well then

a neocon is NOTHING like a neolib
they at least know whats going on
the obamabots just follow a rockstar
LOL

Two different versions of neocons then ... neocons were the blind followers of Bush ...

They follow only their party regardless of the the idiocy of that party.
 
Who needs research ... look at the blind Obama followers ... :eusa_whistle:
well then

a neocon is NOTHING like a neolib
they at least know whats going on
the obamabots just follow a rockstar
LOL

Two different versions of neocons then ... neocons were the blind followers of Bush ...

They follow only their party regardless of the the idiocy of that party.
naw, thats not a neocon
neocons are former dems that were strong on defence and foreign policy hawks
far more socially liberal and more moderate dems
 
No, she is going to write a book that will be on the Best seller list for the next year, and you will probably be first in line to buy it. Then she will stump for CONSERVATIVE candidates, democrat, republican and independent- drawing thousands and thousands of people to her rallies to help gain control of the house in the 2010 elections, lame ducking your guy, Obama, then promoting again a conservative candidate for President in 2012, whether it be herself or someone else who will very easily win by then. Because even you, unless of course you are on welfare, will be sooooooooo sick of Obama and his economic, socialistic, weak on defense, bankrupting the country policies, that your local ice cream truck driver would win easily.

Remember REAGAN, the libs and the liberal press attacked him too. He ran against Jimmy Carter, won a landslide victory, it was announced before the California polls even closed. Then for his second term against Walter Mondale another landslide victory. It was all a slam dunk. You libs know this, that's why Sarah scares the be-Jesus out of you. History has a way of repeating itself. Jimmy was liberal and guess what, your guy is even more of a liberal. I am ready for another slam dunk, I can hardly wait until 2010 and 2012.

You idiots have already destroyed the republican party... I hope the dumb ass eskimo does get the gop nomination. The land slide loss might cause the neo con fascists to losen thier grip on my party and start thier own which they should have done in the first place.

How about "the Christian fundementalist wack job" party...6000 years in the making.

"Don't bother with responsibility..we are counting on the apocolypse to cover our tracks"

Ya ..thats the ticket!
you are such a fucking idiot
the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

NOT anymore
; the neo (NEW) conservatives war hawks were jettisoned by the Democrats after Vietnam tore apart their party... the neocons found a comfortable home in Ronbo's GOP...in 1980 two groups of extremist radicals were welcomed into the party of Lincoln according to GOP insiders...the neocons and the evangelical christians...Radicals have MORE in common than they differ, as they say: "Robins and Blue Jays don't nest together"

BTW...Can't you post without your vile, vulgar and childish language???
 
Who needs research ... look at the blind Obama followers ... :eusa_whistle:
well then

a neocon is NOTHING like a neolib
they at least know whats going on
the obamabots just follow a rockstar
LOL

Two different versions of neocons then ... neocons were the blind followers of Bush ...

They follow only their party regardless of the the idiocy of that party.

Cheney was the real neocon, Bush followed whatever Cheney asked of him until that shooting, imo. I saw a change in their relationship at that point and thereafter. Cheney was on his own and that all became very clear when Bush refused to pardon Libby.
 
* * * *

the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:
 
* * * *

the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Neo-cons..."New Conservatives" are closer to Liberals than conservatives. That statement is so stupid it defies any adjative to explain it.

Dive **** you are an idiot. Watch your pointless neg reps.
 
* * * *

the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

The fact is Neocons have made there home in the Republican party. So whether they are considered more liberal or conservative one thing they all have in common is the letter R in party affiliation.
 
There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

The fact is Neocons have made there home in the Republican party. So whether they are considered more liberal or conservative one thing they all have in common is the letter R in party affiliation.

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...

Liability & Dive Con, or Dive Con & Liability... hard to tell the two pea brains apart
twins.jpg
 
There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Neo-cons..."New Conservatives" are closer to Liberals than conservatives. That statement is so stupid it defies any adjative to explain it.

Dive **** you are an idiot. Watch your pointless neg reps.

I have always found the claim hilarious, they are so liberal they have chosen to join the self proclaimed "conservative" party, and how does the "conservative" party embrace the so called liberals? They nominate them for president, all the way till then end of his term GWB was still widely supported by people who called themselves conservatives. So the question is why would all these so called conservatives support a neocon, closet liberals?

Conservative Republicans Still Widely Support Bush
Averaging just 29% job approval overall thus far in December
by Jeffrey M. Jones
PRINCETON, NJ -- George W. Bush remains popular among conservative Republicans (72% approve of him) despite his low overall approval rating. Meanwhile, moderate and liberal Republicans are as likely to disapprove as to approve of the job he is doing, and Democrats of all political orientations hold Bush in low regard.

Conservative Republicans Still Widely Support Bush
 
* * * *

the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

:lol: That's only because it isn't true. Cheney is a Neocon, so is Rushbo, not too many Libs that can connect with those two.
 
Just look at this list of neocons from the statement of principles for PNAC. Filled with Reagan,and Bush administration officials, damn these guys are bleeding liberals. :lol:

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz

Statement of Principles
 
* * * *

the Neocons are closer to liberals than they are to conservatives
:lol:

There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Gee... I wish you werre smart enough to give an actual meaningful definition of "neocon" instead of simply brandishing that meaningless term as a weapon whenever you need a handy rock to throw at something.

Why would a neocon need to go and join a Party that is already what we nowadays laughingly call "liberal?" Do you comprehend the nature of what a "neocon" is?

Don't bother trying to strain your brain to answer that one. The question was rhetorical. You've already proved that you don't have the first clue what you're talking about.
 
Last edited:
There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Gee... I wish you werre smart enough to give an actual meaningful definition of "neocon" instead of simply brandishing that meaningless term as a weapon whenever you need a handy rock to throw at something.

Why would a neocon need to go and join a Party that is already what we nowadays laughingly call "liberal?" Do you comprehend the nature of what a "neocon" is?

Don't bother trying to strain your brain to answer that one. The question was rhetorical. You've already proved that you don't have the first clue what you're talking about.

Ah, a challenge from a pea brain...it's CLEAR you don't have a clue what a neocon is...I NEVER use the word neocon to describe ordinary right wing pea brains...

The neoconservative or neocons...

neocon_banner2.jpg


The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals who, in the 1960s and 70s, grew disenchanted with what they saw as the American left's social excesses and reluctance to spend adequately on defense. Many of these neocons worked in the 1970s for Democratic Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a staunch anti-communist. By the 1980s, most neocons had become Republicans, finding in President Ronald Reagan an avenue for their aggressive approach of confronting the Soviet Union with bold rhetoric and steep hikes in military spending.

Irving Kristol
irvKristol.jpg


Widely referred to as the "godfather" of neoconservatism, Mr. Kristol was part of the "New York Intellectuals," a group of critics mainly of Eastern European Jewish descent. In the late 1930s, he studied at City College of New York where he became a Trotskyist. From 1947 to 1952, he was the managing editor of Commentary magazine, later called the "neocon bible."

By the late 1960s, Kristol had shifted from left to right on the political spectrum, due partly to what he considered excesses and anti-Americanism among liberals. Kristol built the intellectual framework of neoconservatism, founding and editing journals such as The Public Interest and The National Interest.

Kristol is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of numerous books, including "Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea." He is the father of Weekly Standard editor and oft-quoted neoconservative William Kristol.

US News / Special: Empire Builders | Christian Science Monitor
 
Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Gee... I wish you werre smart enough to give an actual meaningful definition of "neocon" instead of simply brandishing that meaningless term as a weapon whenever you need a handy rock to throw at something.

Why would a neocon need to go and join a Party that is already what we nowadays laughingly call "liberal?" Do you comprehend the nature of what a "neocon" is?

Don't bother trying to strain your brain to answer that one. The question was rhetorical. You've already proved that you don't have the first clue what you're talking about.

Ah, a challenge from a pea brain...it's CLEAR you don't have a clue what a neocon is...I NEVER use the word neocon to describe ordinary right wing pea brains...

The neoconservative or neocons...

neocon_banner2.jpg


The original neocons were a small group of mostly Jewish liberal intellectuals who, in the 1960s and 70s, grew disenchanted with what they saw as the American left's social excesses and reluctance to spend adequately on defense. Many of these neocons worked in the 1970s for Democratic Senator Henry "Scoop" Jackson, a staunch anti-communist. By the 1980s, most neocons had become Republicans, finding in President Ronald Reagan an avenue for their aggressive approach of confronting the Soviet Union with bold rhetoric and steep hikes in military spending.

Irving Kristol
irvKristol.jpg


Widely referred to as the "godfather" of neoconservatism, Mr. Kristol was part of the "New York Intellectuals," a group of critics mainly of Eastern European Jewish descent. In the late 1930s, he studied at City College of New York where he became a Trotskyist. From 1947 to 1952, he was the managing editor of Commentary magazine, later called the "neocon bible."

By the late 1960s, Kristol had shifted from left to right on the political spectrum, due partly to what he considered excesses and anti-Americanism among liberals. Kristol built the intellectual framework of neoconservatism, founding and editing journals such as The Public Interest and The National Interest.

Kristol is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and author of numerous books, including "Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea." He is the father of Weekly Standard editor and oft-quoted neoconservative William Kristol.

US News / Special: Empire Builders | Christian Science Monitor
yeah, trotsky was such a conservative :rolleyes:
you are the only fucking peabrain
 
There aren't very many liberals either smart enough or honest enough to comprehend the truth of that statement, Dive.

Excellent point, though.

Gee...I wish I were smart enough to comprehend WHY the neocons are in the GOP and NOT the Democratic Party if they're closer to liberals than conservatives...

I guess it takes a "SPECIAL" kind of intelligence...:eek::cuckoo::eek:

Neo-cons..."New Conservatives" are closer to Liberals than conservatives. That statement is so stupid it defies any adjative to explain it.

Dive **** you are an idiot. Watch your pointless neg reps.
you deserve every one you get, asshole
 
Just look at this list of neocons from the statement of principles for PNAC. Filled with Reagan,and Bush administration officials, damn these guys are bleeding liberals. :lol:

Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.

Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush

Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes

Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle

Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz

Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen

Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz

Statement of Principles
not every member of PNAC is a neocon, moron
 

Forum List

Back
Top