Sarah Palin resigning as Governor of Alaska

* * * * {blathering stupid preliminary drivel offered by ADoucheySailor snipped}

Provide evidence that nazis were liberal.

LOL!

Why?

Imbeciles like you are not capable of understanding not pre-digested for you by Good Housekeeping and Liberal Orthodoxy Quarterly.

You do not understand the basic premises of modern American "liberalism." Thus, you have no chance at all of grasping why Nazis were, in political ideology, essentially "liberals."

Nice to see that you have none. Just what I thought.

Fuck off ya goddamn pedant. Go please purists. I'm surprised you're still posting on here, because obviously, you're too stupid to suck oxygen.
 
* * * * {blathering stupid preliminary drivel offered by ADoucheySailor snipped}

Provide evidence that nazis were liberal.

LOL!

Why?

Imbeciles like you are not capable of understanding not pre-digested for you by Good Housekeeping and Liberal Orthodoxy Quarterly.

You do not understand the basic premises of modern American "liberalism." Thus, you have no chance at all of grasping why Nazis were, in political ideology, essentially "liberals."

Nice to see that you have none. Just what I thought.

Fuck off ya goddamn pedant. Go please purists. I'm surprised you're still posting on here, because obviously, you're too stupid to suck oxygen.

Translation: Imbecile has nothing of value to say, so he whines like a little bitch.

Good job, SailorGirl.

:clap2:
 
Like I said sperm burper........provide evidence the Nazis were "liberal". Shit..........the very way that they promoted the Aryan race, as well as all the rules that went down with the SS and the Gestapo would beg to differ greatly.

But..........schedule an operation to get a glass belly button so you can see where you're going if you wish to continually keep your head so far up your ass.

A snorkel might not be a bad idea as well.
 
Like I said * * * * provide evidence the Nazis were "liberal". * * * *

It's not "Like I said . . . ." What you meant to say was, "AS I said . . . . "

And the evidence has been presented.

You, like the complete coward you are, simply choose not to take note of it.

I took the liberty of snipping the rest of the imbecility you posted. Waste of electrons.
 
Links, articles, or anything else will suffice. But.......apparently your n00b ass is too fucking stupid to back up your claims.

You're so worthless, even Madoff would trade you for a half pouch of fish.
 
Links, articles, or anything else will suffice. But.......apparently your n00b ass is too fucking stupid to back up your claims.

You're so worthless, even Madoff would trade you for a half pouch of fish.

How can you Ignore the Substance of what's been Posted?...

Your Dismissing doesn't make it go away...

And others can Read it and Decide for themselves.

:)

peace...
 
LOL!

Why?

Imbeciles like you are not capable of understanding not pre-digested for you by Good Housekeeping and Liberal Orthodoxy Quarterly.

You do not understand the basic premises of modern American "liberalism." Thus, you have no chance at all of grasping why Nazis were, in political ideology, essentially "liberals."

Nice to see that you have none. Just what I thought.

Fuck off ya goddamn pedant. Go please purists. I'm surprised you're still posting on here, because obviously, you're too stupid to suck oxygen.

Translation: Imbecile has nothing of value to say, so he whines like a little bitch.

Good job, SailorGirl.

:clap2:
LOL he actually was complimenting you, only i doubt he knew it

pedant - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
 
And they are still filing "Ethics" charges against Palin. Her attorney said last evening in an interview with Gretta Van Sustern that another was filed on the day she announced her resignation, and just as he got that one cleaned up, another was filed yesterday.

People do not realize the amount of time for her and attorneys, and state employees these thngs take to dispose of; there has to be "discovery" to establish the facts, and "depositions" by attorneys to interview witnesses and experts, and then reams of papers to file and record. As she said, the bill will keep adding up for the State of Alaska, until she leaves the scene.

After that, they will be her responsibility to dispose of. I credit her with a noble act, and I suspect a vast majority of the citizens of Alaska think so too.
 
And they are still filing "Ethics" charges against Palin. Her attorney said last evening in an interview with Gretta Van Sustern that another was filed on the day she announced her resignation, and just as he got that one cleaned up, another was filed yesterday.

People do not realize the amount of time for her and attorneys, and state employees these thngs take to dispose of; there has to be "discovery" to establish the facts, and "depositions" by attorneys to interview witnesses and experts, and then reams of papers to file and record. As she said, the bill will keep adding up for the State of Alaska, until she leaves the scene.

After that, they will be her responsibility to dispose of. I credit her with a noble act, and I suspect a vast majority of the citizens of Alaska think so too.
they need to amend that bill she wanted because of unethical assholes on the left like to abuse the law
 
Nice to see that you have none. Just what I thought.

Fuck off ya goddamn pedant. Go please purists. I'm surprised you're still posting on here, because obviously, you're too stupid to suck oxygen.

Translation: Imbecile has nothing of value to say, so he whines like a little bitch.

Good job, SailorGirl.

:clap2:
LOL he actually was complimenting you, only i doubt he knew it

pedant - Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

That's not a compliment. I'm sure he meant it as an insult. It doesn't matter. He's just a poor hapless helpless dope.
 
Which countries had a Charismatic leader who joined with the auto industry to help people pay for fuel efficient cars?

Hint: Democrats Uber Alles!
 
So, you think nazis were "liberal"?

Hate to see what you'd call conservative. Probably something along the lines of North Korea.
gee, what part of "National Socialist" don't you get?

The PART that it is a misnomer...

Many conservatives accuse Hitler of being a leftist, on the grounds that his party was named "National Socialist." But socialism requires worker ownership and control of the means of production. In Nazi Germany, private capitalist individuals owned the means of production, and they in turn were frequently controlled by the Nazi party and state. True socialism does not advocate such economic dictatorship -- it can only be democratic. Hitler's other political beliefs place him almost always on the far right. He advocated racism over racial tolerance, eugenics over freedom of reproduction, merit over equality, competition over cooperation, power politics and militarism over pacifism, dictatorship over democracy, capitalism over Marxism, realism over idealism, nationalism over internationalism, exclusiveness over inclusiveness, common sense over theory or science, pragmatism over principle, and even held friendly relations with the Church, even though he was an atheist.

To most people, Hitler's beliefs belong to the extreme far right. For example, most conservatives believe in patriotism and a strong military; carry these beliefs far enough, and you arrive at Hitler's warring nationalism. This association has long been something of an embarrassment to the far right. To deflect such criticism, conservatives have recently launched a counter-attack, claiming that Hitler was a socialist, and therefore belongs to the political left, not the right.

The primary basis for this claim is that Hitler was a National Socialist. The word "National" evokes the state, and the word "Socialist" openly identifies itself as such.

However, there is no academic controversy over the status of this term: it was a misnomer. Misnomers are quite common in the history of political labels. Examples include the German Democratic Republic (which was neither) and Vladimir Zhirinovsky's "Liberal Democrat" party (which was also neither). The true question is not whether Hitler called his party "socialist," but whether or not it actually was.

In fact, socialism has never been tried at the national level anywhere in the world. This may surprise some people -- after all, wasn't the Soviet Union socialist? The answer is no. Many nations and political parties have called themselves "socialist," but none have actually tried socialism. To understand why, we should revisit a few basic political terms.
Myth: Hitler was a leftist.
 
So, you think nazis were "liberal"?

Hate to see what you'd call conservative. Probably something along the lines of North Korea.
gee, what part of "National Socialist" don't you get?

The PART that it is a misnomer...

Many conservatives accuse Hitler of being a leftist, on the grounds that his party was named "National Socialist." But socialism requires worker ownership and control of the means of production. In Nazi Germany, private capitalist individuals owned the means of production, and they in turn were frequently controlled by the Nazi party and state. True socialism does not advocate such economic dictatorship -- it can only be democratic. Hitler's other political beliefs place him almost always on the far right. He advocated racism over racial tolerance, eugenics over freedom of reproduction, merit over equality, competition over cooperation, power politics and militarism over pacifism, dictatorship over democracy, capitalism over Marxism, realism over idealism, nationalism over internationalism, exclusiveness over inclusiveness, common sense over theory or science, pragmatism over principle, and even held friendly relations with the Church, even though he was an atheist.

To most people, Hitler's beliefs belong to the extreme far right. For example, most conservatives believe in patriotism and a strong military; carry these beliefs far enough, and you arrive at Hitler's warring nationalism. This association has long been something of an embarrassment to the far right. To deflect such criticism, conservatives have recently launched a counter-attack, claiming that Hitler was a socialist, and therefore belongs to the political left, not the right.

The primary basis for this claim is that Hitler was a National Socialist. The word "National" evokes the state, and the word "Socialist" openly identifies itself as such.

However, there is no academic controversy over the status of this term: it was a misnomer. Misnomers are quite common in the history of political labels. Examples include the German Democratic Republic (which was neither) and Vladimir Zhirinovsky's "Liberal Democrat" party (which was also neither). The true question is not whether Hitler called his party "socialist," but whether or not it actually was.

In fact, socialism has never been tried at the national level anywhere in the world. This may surprise some people -- after all, wasn't the Soviet Union socialist? The answer is no. Many nations and political parties have called themselves "socialist," but none have actually tried socialism. To understand why, we should revisit a few basic political terms.
Myth: Hitler was a leftist.

I used to say, "Scratch the surface of any American Librul and underneath you'll find a frothing fascist" but that was before you guys outed yourselves by supporting the Obama Reich.

Oh, Republicans are no better, so feel free to point out Dubya's support of Fascism, I can't argue.
 
I used to say, "Scratch the surface of any American Librul and underneath you'll find a frothing fascist" but that was before you guys outed yourselves by supporting the Obama Reich.

Oh, Republicans are no better, so feel free to point out Dubya's support of Fascism, I can't argue.

President Bush was better.

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay better.
 

Forum List

Back
Top