Sarah Palin resigning as Governor of Alaska

PRESIDENT BUSH'S AMAZING ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Unknown | June 30, 2004 | Unknown

Posted on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 6:33:59 PM by soozla

Oh, pea brain accomplishments...I wanted REAL accomplishments...


THE BUSH RECORD

More than 300 Crimes against Nature

Source: Natural Resources Defense Council


Sierra Magazine - Sierra Club

the more the better

It appears you chose a perfect screen name...
 
PRESIDENT BUSH'S AMAZING ACCOMPLISHMENTS
Unknown | June 30, 2004 | Unknown

Posted on Wednesday, June 30, 2004 6:33:59 PM by soozla

Oh, pea brain accomplishments...I wanted REAL accomplishments...


THE BUSH RECORD

More than 300 Crimes against Nature

Source: Natural Resources Defense Council


Sierra Magazine - Sierra Club

the more the better

It appears you chose a perfect screen name...

perfect for what needs to happen to the tyranny of government and its manipulation of personal freedom through regulatory fascism
 
the more the better

It appears you chose a perfect screen name...

perfect for what needs to happen to the tyranny of government and its manipulation of personal freedom through regulatory fascism

It's also clear you don't know what fascism is and who the executioners are...




The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm
 
It appears you chose a perfect screen name...

perfect for what needs to happen to the tyranny of government and its manipulation of personal freedom through regulatory fascism

It's also clear you don't know what fascism is and who the executioners are...




The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm

:rolleyes:

Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.
 
Last edited:
perfect for what needs to happen to the tyranny of government and its manipulation of personal freedom through regulatory fascism

It's also clear you don't know what fascism is and who the executioners are...




The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm

:rolleyes:

Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.

Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...
 
It's also clear you don't know what fascism is and who the executioners are...




The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm

:rolleyes:

Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.

Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

spit the marbles outa your mouth so people can understand what the fuck youre talking about
 
Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

Christ on a Cracker you Babble...

Do we Lock up Women for being Accused of Cheating on their Husbands in America?...

Well, in Iran, they Bury them up to their Heads and Stone them to Death...

Complain about something Justified for once, you America Hating Bastard!

:)

peace...
 
Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

Christ on a Cracker you Babble...

Do we Lock up Women for being Accused of Cheating on their Husbands in America?...

Well, in Iran, they Bury them up to their Heads and Stone them to Death...

Complain about something Justified for once, you America Hating Bastard!

:)

peace...

SO...Iran is your standard...what a REAL pea brain...
 
It's also clear you don't know what fascism is and who the executioners are...




The early twentieth century Italians, who invented the word fascism, also had a more descriptive term for the concept -- estato corporativo: the corporatist state. Unfortunately for Americans, we have come to equate fascism with its symptoms, not with its structure. The structure of fascism is corporatism, or the corporate state. The structure of fascism is the union, marriage, merger or fusion of corporate economic power with governmental power. Failing to understand fascism, as the consolidation of corporate economic and governmental power in the hands of a few, is to completely misunderstand what fascism is. It is the consolidation of this power that produces the demagogues and regimes we understand as fascist ones.

While we Americans have been trained to keenly identify the opposite of fascism, i.e., government intrusion into and usurpation of private enterprise, we have not been trained to identify the usurpation of government by private enterprise. Our European cousins, on the other hand, having lived with Fascism in several European countries during the last century, know it when they see it, and looking over here, they are ringing the alarm bells. We need to learn how to recognize Fascism now.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article7260.htm

:rolleyes:

Fascism comprises a radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology and a corporatist economic ideology.
-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.

Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

You are the pea brain, kid. You must be more confused today than normal. Hard to imagine, but there you are.

Your ASSumption is also (typically for you) entirely wrong. Lesson? You have no ability to speak for me. You can barely form words for yourself. I do not LOVE government at all and this is no less true when it kills anybody in other parts of the world. On the other hand, I do respect the LEGITIMATE aspects of our government. Sad to say, due to the undue influence of libbies throughout the course of MANY years, the legitimate aspects of our government are overcrowded by the illegitimate aspects of government.

My quarrel is not with the EPA's proper efforts to keep our air and water clean, by the way. My quarrel is when those pinheads (I assume you are their kin) try to regulate freakin' CO2 as a "pollutant." Imbecile libs.
 
:rolleyes:

-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.

Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

You are the pea brain, kid. You must be more confused today than normal. Hard to imagine, but there you are.

Your ASSumption is also (typically for you) entirely wrong. Lesson? You have no ability to speak for me. You can barely form words for yourself. I do not LOVE government at all and this is no less true when it kills anybody in other parts of the world. On the other hand, I do respect the LEGITIMATE aspects of our government. Sad to say, due to the undue influence of libbies throughout the course of MANY years, the legitimate aspects of our government are overcrowded by the illegitimate aspects of government.

My quarrel is not with the EPA's proper efforts to keep our air and water clean, by the way. My quarrel is when those pinheads (I assume you are their kin) try to regulate freakin' CO2 as a "pollutant." Imbecile libs.
hes too fucking stupid to ever understand
all he ever has are the stupid talking points he gets fed
 
:rolleyes:

-- derived from a Wikipedia definition, slightly paraphrased. While Wiki is a fairly unreliable source for much information, the defintion is pretty accurate and suffices.

Let's contemplate that, shall we? Yes. We shall.

Radical and authoritarian nationalist political ideology. Hm. Sounds like the lbieroidal in chief.

Authoritarian in that they STATE makes the rules and individuals lack such authority. Liberalism. And does the STATE severely penalize all those who dare to step out of line? Why yes. The STATE does. Liberalism.

Nationalist? You bet. America was set up by design as a FEDERAL system consisting of a variety of checks and balances to prevent the central (federal) government from having too much power. But the LIBERALS evaded that, systematically and ruthlessly. "Interstate commerce" became their first major tool. It subsumed every other form of limitation on the central government. No 'check' wouldn't yield to the facile analysis of what was or wasn't in the flow of interstate commerce. And the dominoes then all fell. NOW, because of the LBIERAL desire to have an improperly STRONG CENTRAL GOVERNMENT, it is not longer a FEDERAL Government so much as a NATIONAL Government, precisely what it was designed NOT TO BE. Liberal and nationalism go hand in hand.

And what could be MORE of a corporatist economic ideology than to have the damn national government become the primary owner of the means of production? And if you don't recognize that THIS is exactly what President Obama and the liberoidal Democratics presently controlling Congress are doing, then you are either not paying attention or you are not willing to admit the things presented before your very eyes.

Modern American Liberalism IS fascist in nature and in conduct.

Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

You are the pea brain, kid. You must be more confused today than normal. Hard to imagine, but there you are.

Your ASSumption is also (typically for you) entirely wrong. Lesson? You have no ability to speak for me. You can barely form words for yourself. I do not LOVE government at all and this is no less true when it kills anybody in other parts of the world. On the other hand, I do respect the LEGITIMATE aspects of our government. Sad to say, due to the undue influence of libbies throughout the course of MANY years, the legitimate aspects of our government are overcrowded by the illegitimate aspects of government.

My quarrel is not with the EPA's proper efforts to keep our air and water clean, by the way. My quarrel is when those pinheads (I assume you are their kin) try to regulate freakin' CO2 as a "pollutant." Imbecile libs.


OK, than what are the "legitimate" aspects of our government?


WHO creates the substances that pollutes our air and our water... government?
 
Hey pea brain...how come you absolutely LOVE government and it can do no wrong when it kills human beings in other countries or locks up more of it's citizens than ANY other country?

Ironic...the government and the EPA Richard Nixon created have been responsible for limiting deadly pollution...

Maybe you believe pollution is a myth...

You are the pea brain, kid. You must be more confused today than normal. Hard to imagine, but there you are.

Your ASSumption is also (typically for you) entirely wrong. Lesson? You have no ability to speak for me. You can barely form words for yourself. I do not LOVE government at all and this is no less true when it kills anybody in other parts of the world. On the other hand, I do respect the LEGITIMATE aspects of our government. Sad to say, due to the undue influence of libbies throughout the course of MANY years, the legitimate aspects of our government are overcrowded by the illegitimate aspects of government.

My quarrel is not with the EPA's proper efforts to keep our air and water clean, by the way. My quarrel is when those pinheads (I assume you are their kin) try to regulate freakin' CO2 as a "pollutant." Imbecile libs.


OK, than what are the "legitimate" aspects of our government?
the people of the United States are the government, our legitimate aspects include telling our servants what the fuck to do and they better do it, and to stay the fuck out of our way


WHO creates the substances that pollutes our air and our water... government?
god
 
* * * *

OK, than what are the "legitimate" aspects of our government?


WHO creates the substances that pollutes our air and our water... government?


Geez, Louise. This isn't all that difficult, kid. The LEGITIMATE aspects of our FEDERAL government are spelled out in our Constitution. The phrase that pays is LIMITED Government.

Your second question is utterly beside the point, of course. We all know who creates actual pollution. What does THAT have to do with anything I said?
 
Why should anybody give a shit about a guy who wrongfully predicted his party's demise and stabbed them in the back over 4 years ago and made himself look like a crazy SOB in the process?

perfect liberal, you live and die for your party. amazing.

It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....
 
Last edited:
Why should anybody give a shit about a guy who wrongfully predicted his party's demise and stabbed them in the back over 4 years ago and made himself look like a crazy SOB in the process?

perfect liberal, you live and die for your party. amazing.

It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....

zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right. you just plod along like a donkey in a long line of donkeys...or should I say one jackass in a long line of jackasses
 
perfect liberal, you live and die for your party. amazing.

It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....

zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right.

Too bad he was wrong...


0974537616.jpg



And again, he made himself look batshit crazy while doing it, too.


you just plod along like a donkey in a long line of donkeys or should I say one jackass in a long line of jackasses


Flattery'll getcha nowhere, sunshine.

:lol:
 
It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....

zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right.

Too bad he was wrong...


0974537616.jpg



And again, he made himself look batshit crazy while doing it, too.


you just plod along like a donkey in a long line of donkeys or should I say one jackass in a long line of jackasses


Flattery'll getcha nowhere, sunshine.

:lol:

He was Right... And you Know it, and that Hurts... And it Shows.

:)

peace...
 
zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right.

Too bad he was wrong...


0974537616.jpg



And again, he made himself look batshit crazy while doing it, too.


you just plod along like a donkey in a long line of donkeys or should I say one jackass in a long line of jackasses


Flattery'll getcha nowhere, sunshine.

:lol:

He was Right... And you Know it, and that Hurts... And it Shows.

:)

peace...

mmhmm...

And you just keep telling yourself that while wanking and thinking of Sarah's mooseburger.
 

Forum List

Back
Top