Sarah Palin resigning as Governor of Alaska

IT HAS BEEN said the greatest volume of sheer brainpower in one place occurred when Jefferson dined alone...




HOW DID JEFFERSON KNOW??????

Especially read the last quote from 1802.




When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe,
we shall become as corrupt as Europe .
Thomas Jefferson

The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those
who are willing to work and give to those who would not.
Thomas Jefferson

It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes.
A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world.
Thomas Jefferson

I predict future happiness for Americans if they can prevent the
government from wasting the labors of the people under the pretense of taking care of them.
Thomas Jefferson

My reading of history convinces me that most bad government results from too much government.
Thomas Jefferson

No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson

The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.
Thomas Jefferson

The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson

To compel a man to subsidize with his taxes the propagation of ideas which he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical.
Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson said in 1802:
'I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered..'


Boy are we in trouble with this President, he does not beleive any of this.:cuckoo: Pretty scary, see any paralells here, I sure do.
 
Last edited:
It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....

zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right.

Too bad he was wrong...


0974537616.jpg



And again, he made himself look batshit crazy while doing it, too.


you just plod along like a donkey in a long line of donkeys or should I say one jackass in a long line of jackasses


Flattery'll getcha nowhere, sunshine.

:lol:

guys like you are really going to feel the sting next year, better start looking for real estate in canada now
 
It ain't about party, it's about the guy's judgement and why anybody should trust it now.



Btw, to ascribe "living and dying" for a party to just liberals re. the Democrats is hypocritical pot-kettle horseshit.

But you knew that....

zell miller did what you are incapable of doing, he called his party on their bullshit and stood up for what was right.

Too bad he was wrong...


0974537616.jpg



And again, he made himself look batshit crazy while doing it, too.

Now kids watch how easy this is... one of two things will happen in response to this question:

First; she'll ignore the question...

Second, she'll try to respond and in so doing, not answer the question; choosing instead to change the subject.

And the reason is, she's and her ideology are completely FULL OF SHIT.

Now Comrade, about what, EXACTLY was Miller wrong?

And please be as specific as you're intellectual limitations allow.
 
data here, folks, in the latest Gallup poll that's out today. The headline of the Gallup poll is somewhat misleading. "Romney Edges Palin and Huckabee in Early 2012 GOP Test." The subhead is the real story: "Palin's favorable rating stable after announcing her resignation." So the numbers are this: The candidate most likely to support for the 2012 Republican nomination for president today based on Republicans and Republican-leaning independents: Romney 26, Sarah Palin 21, Huckabee 19, Newt 14, Tim Pawlenty, 3%. Haley Barbour, 2%. However, when you get to the favorable ratings of current leading contenders, you have Sarah Palin at 72% approval among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents; 56% approve of Romney and 59% approve of Huckabee.

Let me give you the unfavorables, too: 72-21 unfavorable Palin, 56-17 favorable-unfavorable Romney, 59-16 favorable-unfavorable Huckabee. Now. Now, Sarah Palin's favorable rating among Republicans is the top: 72%. Do you know what this means? I went to dinner the other night. I gotta tell you this. Everywhere I go I run into these Republicans who just spout the Katie Couric version of Palin. "Well, she needs to bone up on foreign policy. She's not very deep, Rush. I think she's embarrassing. I -- I -- I don't know, Rush! I think she's horrible. We don't want anything to do with her." At the dinner table the other night somebody said something similar to that and I said, "No, no, no. I think she's wonderful."

"What do you mean? What do you mean?"

I said, "You know what? We have too many people in our party who allow media to influence what they think of our own candidates, and they're looking at it the wrong way," and I said this at the table. "If any of you here are waiting for a candidate to come along that gains the favor and the approval of the mainstream media then I guarantee you that candidate is a guaranteed loser." I said, "All you have to do -- all you have to do -- is listen to the media. They will tell you. Listen to the Democrats! Sarah Palin, they are trying to destroy. They've been trying to destroy her. They filed another ethics investigation into her in Alaska, after she announced her resignation! They are trying to destroy her." The liberals, the left, the Drive-By Media, they are telling us who our nomination should be! They are telling us who they are most afraid of.

But we have people who listen to this and look at this and say, "Oh, Rush, they don't like Palin. Well, I don't like her, either, you know? If the media doesn't like her she's this or that." Dirty little secret: flying back on the golf trip, flying back cross-country, I had this conversation -- the exact conversation -- and I got a little mad and I threw my eyeglasses off on the seat in front of me I excused myself and went back to the bathroom at the end of the plane to cool off 'cause I was hearing the same stuff. Now, let me put this 72% in perspective. Name for me any Republican or conservative who has had a 72% approval rating in the party after a year of trashing by the State-Run Media and the Democrat Party. Name for me one Republican candidate who has maintained a 72% approval rating while their life and their career has been under assault for the purpose of destruction, which is the case with Sarah Palin.

She has 72% approval in Palin in the Gallup poll. Political gurus and pundits -- these yapping yammerers all over TV; Palin trashers in the Republican Party; the sordid, looking-down-the-nose, low-wattage elitists -- you might call the office here to figure out what's going on. This is not going to sit well with the elites in the Republican Party, the country club, blue-blood, Rockefeller Republicans. They don't like her nearly as much as the Democrats don't like her, but I think this is huge: 72% after a year in which she has been a target of literal political destruction. Folks, I'm just telling you: If there are any of you wimpy, wishy-washy Republicans out there who so desperately want to have a candidate that the sophisticates in the media in Washington and New York approve of, you are guaranteed to secure the Republican Party defeat after defeat after defeat. If you're going to let them pick our nominee -- which happened last time, by the way.

They picked our nominee. That would be John Sidney McCain. They picked him, and then after they picked him of course they abandoned him and moved over for Obama. Even Colin Powell. He did the same thing even though McCain is Powell's ideal Republican. You couple this news with what we mentioned yesterday: 40% of the American people identify themselves as conservative; 21% identify themselves as liberal. Liberals don't have the guts to tell anybody who they are. Sotomayor is the latest glittering example of that. I think 35% call themselves independents. You might say, "Well, you shouldn't. Those people are liberals, too." Eh, I don't know. In this context, I'm not actually certain. But regardless this cannot be said enough. See, the Gallup poll leads with "Romney Edges Palin 26-21" in, "Who you gonna vote for?" which is three-and-a -half years away. It's irrelevant. Approval numbers: 72% for Palin after this year she's had, and 56% for Romney?




END TRANSCRIPT

Read the Background Material...
 
0974537616.jpg











Btw, I'm a he. Did you not know this or is calling me "she" some pathetic schoolyard attempt at namecalling?


That is EXACTLY what SHE does...LOL

There was some jaggoff named Ghoster at the Hannity boards that did that, too. Really childish shit.


Pubic Infinitum is an over the top authoritarian follower...Monica Lewinsky class, SHE (LOL) wouldn't know, recognize or support a single tenet of our founding fathers...

It is right wing pea brainism gone wild...:eek::cuckoo::lol:


"Have you ever heard of a bleeding heart Republican?"
Paul Craig Roberts - the father of Reaganomics

BTW, Zell Miller is a racist...he's what was called a Dixiecrat...
 
guys like you are really going to feel the sting next year, better start looking for real estate in canada now

I remember guys like you saying stuff like that in 2005, too.

:lol:

dont worry about it, its better when people like you are blindsided anyway

Oh no, I'm well aware things could go south for the Dems next year. I'm just not gonna take the word of a shit-talking con on a message board, either. Especially when one can clearly see the GOoPers still have plenty of problems, too.
 
I remember guys like you saying stuff like that in 2005, too.

:lol:

dont worry about it, its better when people like you are blindsided anyway

Oh no, I'm well aware things could go south for the Dems next year. I'm just not gonna take the word of a shit-talking con on a message board, either. Especially when one can clearly see the GOoPers still have plenty of problems, too.

yeah they do, and they will continue to as long as they keep throwing out mitt romneys and john mccains...but, the dems have far worse problems so any new comer with guts who is willing to stand up and be counted will beat the shit out of any nutbag slobbering incumbent
 
Last edited:
I remember guys like you saying stuff like that in 2005, too.

:lol:

dont worry about it, its better when people like you are blindsided anyway

Oh no, I'm well aware things could go south for the Dems next year. I'm just not gonna take the word of a shit-talking con on a message board, either. Especially when one can clearly see the GOoPers still have plenty of problems, too.
LOL thats funny, coming from a shit talkin lib like YOU
:lol:
 
yeah they do, and they will continue to as long as they keep throwing out mitt romneys and john mccains...but, the dems have far worse problems so any new comer with guts who is willing to stand up and be counted will beat the shit out of any nutbag slobbering incumbent

Please, please, please throw out Sarah Palin next time 'round.

Please.
 
yeah they do, and they will continue to as long as they keep throwing out mitt romneys and john mccains...but, the dems have far worse problems so any new comer with guts who is willing to stand up and be counted will beat the shit out of any nutbag slobbering incumbent

Please, please, please throw out Sarah Palin next time 'round.

Please.
be careful what you wish for
 
yeah they do, and they will continue to as long as they keep throwing out mitt romneys and john mccains...but, the dems have far worse problems so any new comer with guts who is willing to stand up and be counted will beat the shit out of any nutbag slobbering incumbent

Please, please, please throw out Sarah Palin next time 'round.

Please.

PRETTY please...:lol:
 
yeah they do, and they will continue to as long as they keep throwing out mitt romneys and john mccains...but, the dems have far worse problems so any new comer with guts who is willing to stand up and be counted will beat the shit out of any nutbag slobbering incumbent

Please, please, please throw out Sarah Palin next time 'round.

Please.
be careful what you wish for

all the liberals that abused palin DESERVE 8 years of Palin.
 
be careful what you wish for

all the liberals that abused palin DESERVE 8 years of Palin.

NO one deserves Palin... she is totally unqualified, lazy and a quitter...

Hey fellow Dems! We want Palin to be the Republican nominee in 2012. She will be easy to beat, and by 2012 people will be so tired of seeing her face they'll just want her off their television screen. Palin in HD......please.

sony-kdl-46v3000-lcd-hdtv.jpg
 

Forum List

Back
Top