Sarah Sanders Broke The Law When She Attacked The Restaurant That Refused To Serve Her

[Billy_Bob]

She didn't condemn the business.

View attachment 200637

She singled them out knowing what would happen. They have received death threats because she abused her official government position and the power it comes with to destroy them. Easy win for the restaurant in a lawsuit.

What a loon. The waitress posted about Sanders being 86ed. The restaurant tried to claim her ouster as a trophy. She posted the facts. But I can see why that disturbs you.

Disturbed? You nuts are the ones losing your minds and sending death threats to the restaurant owners. You are disgusting, filthy people.

I have never sent a death threat to anyone in my entire existence.

You SJW-Prog loons set the New Rules when you attacked the pizza maker, florist and bakery owner. They received death threats (one of them for a purely speculative refusal of service) for not engaging in commerce with one of your preferred identify groups. You started it. Now you don't like the New Rules being applied to you. The world's smallest violin is too big....

Imagine if Obama's Press Secretary had been the sole cause of the death threats and attacks on those business. I would argue he should be sued in court. Although circumstances are somewhat different, since the businesses you mentioned were in violation of the law.

Selective Amnesia?

Does Joe the Plumber ring any bells? you ignorant fk

 

[Billy_Bob]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blow up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

There ya go introducing facts again....

 

[boedicca]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blow up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

There ya go introducing facts again....

Oh, I know. I also broke the SJW-Prog law of "Because, Feelz and Just Shut Up".

 

[bripat9643]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The interesting thing here, to me, is that Sarah Sanders absolutely knows what she did was inappropriate. She has spent most of her adult life handling the public communications of government officials.

But Sarah knows that it just doesn't matter anymore. She certainly has nothing to fear from her classless, unethical boss.

So, here we are...a careful, deliberate, brilliant person like Sanders is now blurring the ethical lines of her position. This is what it looks like when shit trickles downhill.

 

[boedicca]

The interesting thing here, to me, is that Sarah Sanders absolutely knows what she did was inappropriate. She has spent most of her adult life handling the public communications of government officials.

But Sarah knows that it just doesn't matter anymore. She certainly has nothing to fear from her classless, unethical boss.

So, here we are...a careful, deliberate, brilliant person like Sanders is now blurring the ethical lines of her position. This is what it looks like when shit trickles downhill.

Oh blah blah blah so sleepy....zzzzz.

You are not an authority on what Sarah Sanders absolutely knew.

What we all do know is that the Red Hen manager was incredibly rude to a family that was there to have dinner.

 

[bripat9643]

The interesting thing here, to me, is that Sarah Sanders absolutely knows what she did was inappropriate. She has spent most of her adult life handling the public communications of government officials.

But Sarah knows that it just doesn't matter anymore. She certainly has nothing to fear from her classless, unethical boss.

So, here we are...a careful, deliberate, brilliant person like Sanders is now blurring the ethical lines of her position. This is what it looks like when shit trickles downhill.

It wasn't the slightest bit inappropriate, you fucking dumbass.

However, now we all know that you are a shameless lying douchebag.

 

[Billy_Bob]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

 

[boedicca]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

Thank you, but please note, I'm a gal.

And Sanders did not throw a punch. She commented that the Red Hen manager's action reflects on the manager, not Sanders. That's pretty much a truism for everyone's behavior.

 

[bripat9643]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

Some imbeciles in here, such as dragonlady, claim it's a "government account," and therefore it's illegal for Sanders to have used it to post about what happened.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are not an authority on what Sarah Sanders absolutely knew.

Huh? Of course she knew that was not appropriate. Are you implying she is incompetent, and has been for 15 years? She's great at her job. She knows it is inappropriate.

 

[boedicca]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

Some imbeciles in here, such as dragonlady, claim it's a "government account," and therefore it's illegal for Sanders to have used it to post about what happened.

What is the law that would make her using the account illegal even if it is owned by the government?

 

[bripat9643]

You are not an authority on what Sarah Sanders absolutely knew.

Huh? Of course she knew that was not appropriate. Are you implying she is incompetent, and has been for 15 years? She's great at her job. She knows it is inappropriate.

You are the one who has no clue about what's appropriate.

 

[Billy_Bob]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

Thank you, but please note, I'm a gal.

And Sanders did not throw a punch. She commented that the Red Hen manager's action reflects on the manager, not Sanders. That's pretty much a truism for everyone's behavior.

My bad on gender...

As for 'punch' i meant it figuratively and it was the restaurant that did with the first tweet.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It wasn't the slightest bit inappropriate

Of course it was. She should not have named the restaurant, and likely should not have mentioned it all. That's when a person should let the press dot he footwork.

But, in the midst of what is a dumpster fire of ethics, it doesn't really stand out.

 

[JustAnotherNut]

So now even the media is pushing Sanders 'ethics' violations...….and that's bad, very very bad, right?


But libs still defend Clinton's use of private server for confidential emails.


Oh the hypocrisy.....

 

[boedicca]

You are not an authority on what Sarah Sanders absolutely knew.

Huh? Of course she knew that was not appropriate. Are you implying she is incompetent, and has been for 15 years? She's great at her job. She knows it is inappropriate.

Sorry to disappoint, but as you are not her therapist, I do not accept that you are an authority on the innerworkings of her mind.

She posted a civil response to the restaurant publicizing the rude treatment. If you think it wasn't appropriate, that just proves your SJW-Prog bonafides and adherence to the "Because, Feelz and Just Shut Up" law you loons apply to everyone whom you don't like.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So now even the media is pushing Sanders 'ethics' violations...….and that's bad, very very bad, right?


But libs still defend Clinton's use of private server for confidential emails.


Oh the hypocrisy.....

Damn that is a stupid point. All the same libs? All libs?

Hey look, white people are helping minorities at a school in that city. Yet white people are still marching with torches. White people...pfft ..

See how stupid?

 

[Aba Incieni]

You are not an authority on what Sarah Sanders absolutely knew.

Huh? Of course she knew that was not appropriate. Are you implying she is incompetent, and has been for 15 years? She's great at her job. She knows it is inappropriate.

They aren't cowering like they're supposed to anymore. Time for another sky scream. Wear your vagina costume for added drama.

 

[bripat9643]

One of the servers posted a tweet about Sanders being "86ed" which referenced her PresSec account. Note it is posted at 11:16pm pm June 22nd. Sanders' tweet wasn't posted until the following morning at 7:53am. So, the Red Hen started this public dirty laundry airing themselves. The server calling out Sanders' twitter handle blows up OldFool's legal nonsense.

View attachment 200713

View attachment 200715

Where is the evidence that @PressSec is government property?

His point was, the restaurant threw first punch.. Sanders has every right to defend herself..... ownership of the account is not an issue as no monies were ever exchanged.

Some imbeciles in here, such as dragonlady, claim it's a "government account," and therefore it's illegal for Sanders to have used it to post about what happened.

What is the law that would make her using the account illegal even if it is owned by the government?

According to DragonLady it's 5 CFR 2635.702(a). That claim is based on it being an "official account." However, no one has demonstrated that the account used is in any way "official."