Schiff withholding transcript that exposes his prior contact with whistleblower

[Hutch Starskey]

You didn't answer my question. When Schiff became aware of a WB complaint does not change the substance of that complaint or the subsequent testimony corroborating that substance.

Where is the setup?

that's where it started. why not come forward there and say "we need to look into this". instead he used it to attack trump and build a complete case created from hearsay.

would you allow hearsay evidence against your family? if not, why is it ok here?

it's a setup. trump is coming after them for milking taxpayers for billions it would seem and you don't even seem to care about that. just getting rid of trump. you ever stop to think...what is trump is right? they WERE laundering money!

You're not making a case for a setup. You're bitching about the process.

How did they "setup" the corroborating testimony from the witnesses?

well since the process itself is changing to suit the needs of the setup, they've been combined by the left. tell them to stop combining things and it won't be as confusing.

It's not confusing at all. You're confused because you're incompetent.

You still have not made a case for a setup.
How did they "setup" the corroborating testimony from the witnesses?

OK now you are just back to being insulting. later.

I find your ignorance and inability insulting but I don't run away.

Are you able to explain the "setup" yet?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why is the WB so important at this time in your mind?

cause it is like "ground 0" for the setup. how can someones testimony suddenly be not valid or needed? didn't hold up? wasn't true? tell me, why do you not need your original complaint? got a lot of other crap you thew on the wall to confuse things?

Setup?
What evidence is there of a "setup"?

Subsequent testimony has only corroborated the WB.

"setup" is like allowing "hearsay evidence" to impeach in the House, when it's not allowed in the senate.
"setup" is allowing hearsay evidence when the WB law doesn't even allow it, i.e. its not "credible" and not intended for whining about the president
"setup" is like not allowing the WB to be cross-examined when he will be in the senate (hint: the WB law protects the WB's job, not ID)
"setup" is trying to impeach a president even though no crime has been committed
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

Fear not, the senate trial should be even more entertaining than the Schiff show.

Why is the WB important in your mind?

The WB is important because of the furor he caused. Ciaramella, a low level nobody (CIA plant?) writes a letter that only has 2nd or 3rd hand info, and that somehow gets past the ICIG as "credible" (when its not) because it doesn't have 1st hand knowledge, as required. Was the WB one of Brennan's plants? Who actually wrote the letter? Was it Ciaramella or Schiff's staff? The WB law was supposed to only be for the DNI and his underlings, not for the president, so there are a lot of questions as to what happened and did it comply with the WB law. Was the WB coached by Schiff or his staff?

Who is Ciaramella?
The ICIG found it to be "credible and urgent".

Trump caused the furor with his actions.

The WB simply pointed it out. First hand witnesses have since corroborated the WB'S complaint. The WB at this point is irrelevant.

 

[Crepitus]

His/her life has been threatened by the *president* himself. Anonymity is his/her best defense.

His name is Eric Ciaramella. Everybody in D.C. knows it.

No, they don't.

You criminals have just picked a scapegoat because you need someone to hate or you will implode.

 

[Hellokitty]

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Not sure why republicans don't fight back. One of them needs to take some cold medication and accidentally leak the transcript or notes from the transcript.

 

[kyzr]

cause it is like "ground 0" for the setup. how can someones testimony suddenly be not valid or needed? didn't hold up? wasn't true? tell me, why do you not need your original complaint? got a lot of other crap you thew on the wall to confuse things?

Setup?
What evidence is there of a "setup"?

Subsequent testimony has only corroborated the WB.

"setup" is like allowing "hearsay evidence" to impeach in the House, when it's not allowed in the senate.
"setup" is allowing hearsay evidence when the WB law doesn't even allow it, i.e. its not "credible" and not intended for whining about the president
"setup" is like not allowing the WB to be cross-examined when he will be in the senate (hint: the WB law protects the WB's job, not ID)
"setup" is trying to impeach a president even though no crime has been committed
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

Fear not, the senate trial should be even more entertaining than the Schiff show.

Why is the WB important in your mind?

The WB is important because of the furor he caused. Ciaramella, a low level nobody (CIA plant?) writes a letter that only has 2nd or 3rd hand info, and that somehow gets past the ICIG as "credible" (when its not) because it doesn't have 1st hand knowledge, as required. Was the WB one of Brennan's plants? Who actually wrote the letter? Was it Ciaramella or Schiff's staff? The WB law was supposed to only be for the DNI and his underlings, not for the president, so there are a lot of questions as to what happened and did it comply with the WB law. Was the WB coached by Schiff or his staff?

Who is Ciaramella?
The ICIG found it to be "credible and urgent".

Trump caused the furor with his actions.

The WB simply pointed it out. First hand witnesses have since corroborated the WB'S complaint. The WB at this point is irrelevant.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.
The ICIG should not have found anything credible based on the "hearsay" evidence. That's how the law reads.
Agree, Trump should have used the phrase "investigate Burisma" which everyone says is corrupt, instead of "investigate the Bidens".
That still doesn't excuse the Bidens from suspicion based on the huge sums of money that they pilfered from Ukraine.
We disagree that the WB is irrelevant.
The WB and Schiff need to be questioned as to the coordination involved, especially the legitimacy of the complaint based on the WB law.

 

[The Purge]

Setup?
What evidence is there of a "setup"?

Subsequent testimony has only corroborated the WB.

"setup" is like allowing "hearsay evidence" to impeach in the House, when it's not allowed in the senate.
"setup" is allowing hearsay evidence when the WB law doesn't even allow it, i.e. its not "credible" and not intended for whining about the president
"setup" is like not allowing the WB to be cross-examined when he will be in the senate (hint: the WB law protects the WB's job, not ID)
"setup" is trying to impeach a president even though no crime has been committed
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

Fear not, the senate trial should be even more entertaining than the Schiff show.

Why is the WB important in your mind?

The WB is important because of the furor he caused. Ciaramella, a low level nobody (CIA plant?) writes a letter that only has 2nd or 3rd hand info, and that somehow gets past the ICIG as "credible" (when its not) because it doesn't have 1st hand knowledge, as required. Was the WB one of Brennan's plants? Who actually wrote the letter? Was it Ciaramella or Schiff's staff? The WB law was supposed to only be for the DNI and his underlings, not for the president, so there are a lot of questions as to what happened and did it comply with the WB law. Was the WB coached by Schiff or his staff?

Who is Ciaramella?
The ICIG found it to be "credible and urgent".

Trump caused the furor with his actions.

The WB simply pointed it out. First hand witnesses have since corroborated the WB'S complaint. The WB at this point is irrelevant.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.
The ICIG should not have found anything credible based on the "hearsay" evidence. That's how the law reads.
Agree, Trump should have used the phrase "investigate Burisma" which everyone says is corrupt, instead of "investigate the Bidens".
That still doesn't excuse the Bidens from suspicion based on the huge sums of money that they pilfered from Ukraine.
We disagree that the WB is irrelevant.
The WB and Schiff need to be questioned as to the coordination involved, especially the legitimacy of the complaint based on the WB law.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Setup?
What evidence is there of a "setup"?

Subsequent testimony has only corroborated the WB.

"setup" is like allowing "hearsay evidence" to impeach in the House, when it's not allowed in the senate.
"setup" is allowing hearsay evidence when the WB law doesn't even allow it, i.e. its not "credible" and not intended for whining about the president
"setup" is like not allowing the WB to be cross-examined when he will be in the senate (hint: the WB law protects the WB's job, not ID)
"setup" is trying to impeach a president even though no crime has been committed
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

Fear not, the senate trial should be even more entertaining than the Schiff show.

Why is the WB important in your mind?

The WB is important because of the furor he caused. Ciaramella, a low level nobody (CIA plant?) writes a letter that only has 2nd or 3rd hand info, and that somehow gets past the ICIG as "credible" (when its not) because it doesn't have 1st hand knowledge, as required. Was the WB one of Brennan's plants? Who actually wrote the letter? Was it Ciaramella or Schiff's staff? The WB law was supposed to only be for the DNI and his underlings, not for the president, so there are a lot of questions as to what happened and did it comply with the WB law. Was the WB coached by Schiff or his staff?

Who is Ciaramella?
The ICIG found it to be "credible and urgent".

Trump caused the furor with his actions.

The WB simply pointed it out. First hand witnesses have since corroborated the WB'S complaint. The WB at this point is irrelevant.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.
The ICIG should not have found anything credible based on the "hearsay" evidence. That's how the law reads.
Agree, Trump should have used the phrase "investigate Burisma" which everyone says is corrupt, instead of "investigate the Bidens".
That still doesn't excuse the Bidens from suspicion based on the huge sums of money that they pilfered from Ukraine.
We disagree that the WB is irrelevant.
The WB and Schiff need to be questioned as to the coordination involved, especially the legitimacy of the complaint based on the WB law.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.

The WB'S identity has not been confirmed.


"Legitimacy of the complaint"?

It's been corroborated by multiple witnesses, dope.

 

[kyzr]

"setup" is like allowing "hearsay evidence" to impeach in the House, when it's not allowed in the senate.
"setup" is allowing hearsay evidence when the WB law doesn't even allow it, i.e. its not "credible" and not intended for whining about the president
"setup" is like not allowing the WB to be cross-examined when he will be in the senate (hint: the WB law protects the WB's job, not ID)
"setup" is trying to impeach a president even though no crime has been committed
Trump's Ukraine transcript: Unwise words but no proof of a crime

Fear not, the senate trial should be even more entertaining than the Schiff show.

Why is the WB important in your mind?

The WB is important because of the furor he caused. Ciaramella, a low level nobody (CIA plant?) writes a letter that only has 2nd or 3rd hand info, and that somehow gets past the ICIG as "credible" (when its not) because it doesn't have 1st hand knowledge, as required. Was the WB one of Brennan's plants? Who actually wrote the letter? Was it Ciaramella or Schiff's staff? The WB law was supposed to only be for the DNI and his underlings, not for the president, so there are a lot of questions as to what happened and did it comply with the WB law. Was the WB coached by Schiff or his staff?

Who is Ciaramella?
The ICIG found it to be "credible and urgent".

Trump caused the furor with his actions.

The WB simply pointed it out. First hand witnesses have since corroborated the WB'S complaint. The WB at this point is irrelevant.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.
The ICIG should not have found anything credible based on the "hearsay" evidence. That's how the law reads.
Agree, Trump should have used the phrase "investigate Burisma" which everyone says is corrupt, instead of "investigate the Bidens".
That still doesn't excuse the Bidens from suspicion based on the huge sums of money that they pilfered from Ukraine.
We disagree that the WB is irrelevant.
The WB and Schiff need to be questioned as to the coordination involved, especially the legitimacy of the complaint based on the WB law.

Eric Ciaramella is the "whistle-blower", a CIA plant in the WH put there by Brennan.

The WB'S identity has not been confirmed.


"Legitimacy of the complaint"?

It's been corroborated by multiple witnesses, dope.

So you really think that some low level nobody can write a perfect WB complaint using all hearsay evidence and that starts an impeachment of the president?
You really think that the WB law says that is "credible"?
You really think that the WB law applies to the president? Hint: It only applies to the DNI and those under the DNI, not the president. The ICIG was wrong.
Who corroborated it? The GOP House members castrated the "witnesses" on TV.
You conveniently did not reply to the Biden's Ukrainian cash cow? What did they do for that much money? Same question with the Chinese "investment".

 

[Lysistrata]

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could not have committed perjury.

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

 

[iceberg]

that's where it started. why not come forward there and say "we need to look into this". instead he used it to attack trump and build a complete case created from hearsay.

would you allow hearsay evidence against your family? if not, why is it ok here?

it's a setup. trump is coming after them for milking taxpayers for billions it would seem and you don't even seem to care about that. just getting rid of trump. you ever stop to think...what is trump is right? they WERE laundering money!

You're not making a case for a setup. You're bitching about the process.

How did they "setup" the corroborating testimony from the witnesses?

well since the process itself is changing to suit the needs of the setup, they've been combined by the left. tell them to stop combining things and it won't be as confusing.

It's not confusing at all. You're confused because you're incompetent.

You still have not made a case for a setup.
How did they "setup" the corroborating testimony from the witnesses?

OK now you are just back to being insulting. later.

I find your ignorance and inability insulting but I don't run away.

Are you able to explain the "setup" yet?

good. i'd hate to think a fucking moron like you found anything of value from me.

 

[kyzr]

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could not have committed perjury.

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

1. What conspiracy? The one involving Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump? That is the only conspiracy that is proven.
2. Trump killed Russians in Syria. Trump gave the Ukraine lethal weapons including Javelin anti-tank weapons..The democrats sent blankets
3. Your post is complete nonsense. The Mueller Investigation totally disproved your bullshit post. Got any links supporting your lies?

 

[Lysistrata]

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could not have committed perjury.

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

1. What conspiracy? The one involving Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump? That is the only conspiracy that is proven.
2. Trump killed Russians in Syria. Trump gave the Ukraine lethal weapons including Javelin anti-tank weapons..The democrats sent blankets
3. Your post is complete nonsense. The Mueller Investigation totally disproved your bullshit post. Got any links supporting your lies?

View attachment 293106

Do you actually think that Ms. Clinton paying Russians for dirt on the orange whore has been proven? Ha. Ha. The orange whore and his cronies are Russian puppets. The orange whore takes orders from putin. There is nothing like having a resident of the Oval Office selling out our nation to one of our chief enemies for personal gain.

 

[DOTR]

His/her life has been threatened by the *president* himself. Anonymity is his/her best defense.

His name is Eric Ciaramella. Everybody in D.C. knows it.

And he has been working against the American people and President Trump for several years from within. In the end they want a Star Chamber...whether within the press or within the system of government they use the "anonymous" label to hide their own fingerprints

Remember this?
Opinion | I Am Part of the Resistance Inside the Trump Administration

 

[The Purge]

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could not have committed perjury.

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

Just how fucking stupid are you documents sayvyou LIE!!!

State Department documents expose Biden-Ukraine corruption | One America News Network

 

[The Purge]

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

1. What conspiracy? The one involving Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump? That is the only conspiracy that is proven.
2. Trump killed Russians in Syria. Trump gave the Ukraine lethal weapons including Javelin anti-tank weapons..The democrats sent blankets
3. Your post is complete nonsense. The Mueller Investigation totally disproved your bullshit post. Got any links supporting your lies?

View attachment 293106

Do you actually think that Ms. Clinton paying Russians for dirt on the orange whore has been proven? Ha. Ha. The orange whore and his cronies are Russian puppets. The orange whore takes orders from putin. There is nothing like having a resident of the Oval Office selling out our nation to one of our chief enemies for personal gain.

And from NBC NEWS

SNIP...
When Trump became the Republican nominee, the Clinton campaign and the Democratic Party began picking up the tab for the Fusion research. Fusion owner Glenn Simpson hired Steele, a Russia expert, to gather information from his sources in Russia.

THERECIS NO DOUBT THE HILDEBEAST PAID FOR THE DOSSIER!!!...

 

[BluesLegend]

Look, Schiff went on national tv and declared Trump was guilty BEFORE the first witness even testified. The American people won't stand for that crap. Schiff and the rest of these lawless scum Democrats can rot in hell.

 

[bripat9643]

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff has released 15 transcripts of closed-door testimony in the Democrats' impeachment investigation, but one remains under lock and key. It's the transcript of the more than eight hours of testimony of Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson on Oct. 4, noted investigative reporter Paul Sperry in a tweet.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...

------------

That transcript will never see the light of day.

Unless they push this to a Senate trial and they subpoena it.

Wouldn't that be a perjury charge for the sack of Schitt!

Factcheck: Adam Schiff wrong on whistleblower contact

Apparently, the whistleblower contacted an aide to the Intelligence Committee because s/he was concerned about the CIA lawyer's handling of his internal complaint, not Schiff personally. Atkinson was required by law to turn over the whistleblower's complaint to Congress. This does not show any personal involvement by Schiff.

In any event, there can be no perjury charge, as Schiff never testified under oath about anything, so he could have committed perjury.

Then perhaps we get ALL THE STAFF MEMBERS to testify to the FACT that they all knew the WB but NONE OF THEM EVER TOLD SCHITT ABOUT it!....Seems might odd that THEY had direct contact and didn't tell the chairman?....We are expected to believe in unicorns!!!

Source? While one aide could have had contact with the whistleblower, and it may even have been a phone call, how many aides does the committee have, and how is it a "fact" that they "all" knew the whistleblower? How do you have such inside knowledge?

One aid is all it takes. Furthermore, we all know that if their was one aid, then the entire Schiff staff was in on it, including Schiff.

Who wrote the complaint for the WB? He sure as hell didn't do it himself.

 

[iceberg]

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

1. What conspiracy? The one involving Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump? That is the only conspiracy that is proven.
2. Trump killed Russians in Syria. Trump gave the Ukraine lethal weapons including Javelin anti-tank weapons..The democrats sent blankets
3. Your post is complete nonsense. The Mueller Investigation totally disproved your bullshit post. Got any links supporting your lies?

View attachment 293106

Do you actually think that Ms. Clinton paying Russians for dirt on the orange whore has been proven? Ha. Ha. The orange whore and his cronies are Russian puppets. The orange whore takes orders from putin. There is nothing like having a resident of the Oval Office selling out our nation to one of our chief enemies for personal gain.

so nothing against hillary has been proven but yet all this has been proven against trump EVEN THOUGH we have zero evidence for that one.

you quite funny. bitch there is no proof on hillary then jump on trump, without proof. just "feelz".

 

[kyzr]

Hope you are right. Before this mess is over, I think we will know for sure.

One has to have testified under oath to be charged with perjury. Nunes, on the other hand, is getting interesting. Acting as a part of a conspiracy to cover up an enemy's attack on the U.S., while a member of Congress, and then sitting as a member of a committee investigating the conspiracy and failing to disclose his own conduct does not look good. He's the one who should be under oath.

LOL! How about you follow the money to the Biden's bank accounts and then get back to me on the conspiracy.

The Bidens have absolutely nothing to do with the incredibly dangerous conspiracy to let the Russians take over our democracy and conspiring with the Russians to elect, and then re-elect a Russian puppet as POTUS, including facilitating his abuse of his office to force a political contribution (in kind) out of a nation that is an ally of the U.S., has been subjected to Russian aggression, and depends, at least in part, on U.S. support as a superpower, to assist it in its fight against Russian aggression.

1. What conspiracy? The one involving Hillary paying Russians for dirt on Trump? That is the only conspiracy that is proven.
2. Trump killed Russians in Syria. Trump gave the Ukraine lethal weapons including Javelin anti-tank weapons..The democrats sent blankets
3. Your post is complete nonsense. The Mueller Investigation totally disproved your bullshit post. Got any links supporting your lies?

View attachment 293106

Do you actually think that Ms. Clinton paying Russians for dirt on the orange whore has been proven? Ha. Ha. The orange whore and his cronies are Russian puppets. The orange whore takes orders from putin. There is nothing like having a resident of the Oval Office selling out our nation to one of our chief enemies for personal gain.

The only problem with your lies is that the Mueller Investigation already proved that there was no collusion, and yes its proven who paid for the Steele Dossier, Hillary paid the Russians. Why wasn't that investigated by Mueller? That is real Russian interference in a US election.
Allegations That Clinton Campaign Funded Trump-Russia Research Still Pending At Now-Closed FEC
"Steele is a former British security service operative who authored the report that included claims about President Trump's alleged links with Russia and allegations that the Kremlin may have incriminating evidence about the president's activities in Moscow.

The CLC filed a complaint with the FEC in October 2017, claiming the money to pay for the opposition research was routed through the law firm of Perkins Coie.
They failed to accurately disclose the purpose and recipient of payments for the dossier of research alleging connections between then-candidate Donald Trump and Russia, effectively hiding these payments from public scrutiny, contrary to the requirements of federal law," the CLC stated when the complaint was filed.

 

[Politicallyinsane]

It wouldn't change the reality thatTrump committed crimes one little bit even if the whistleblower was schiffs gay lover.