JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,767
- 2,220
Tens of millions of US CITIZENS do also.I do.Nobody wants your fundamentalist views of an 18th century Constitution
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tens of millions of US CITIZENS do also.I do.Nobody wants your fundamentalist views of an 18th century Constitution
Irrelevant. Kalifornia don't count.considering how the vote went, I would have to suggest that you are on the wrong end of that argument.what it shows is that the American people want judges that at least give the impression that they would rule by the constitution instead of their own personal preferences on a subject.There are 23 reasons that Schumer will fail.
Care to guess what they are?
Thats right, 23 Democratic Senators up for re-election in 2018........
The 2016 election showed that the American people do not care if there are only 8 judges on the Supreme Court
If they did, they would have made the Republicans pay
obama wanted to stack the court with racist liberal anti American pieces of shit. The American public voted to stop him, and won.
Save us the Rightwing bullshit
Nobody wants your fundamentalist views of an 18th century Constitution
No go sit down, shut up and get ready for the ride. With luck maybe we can pass by some third world hell hole that would better comply with your desires.
The vote said the American public did not want Trump to pick the next justice
The vast majority of those screeching that they want to see Trump's tax returns wouldn't have a clue how to read them, much less what to get upset about. What they really want is for the returns to be picked apart by others with too much time on their hands who then give them a morsel or two so they can pretend to be outraged, just outraged.Where are Trumps taxes, waiting.......
What possible use would you have for Trump's tax-return other than window-peeking?
TrueI would just do as mcconnell did. He's a good teacher![]()
I actually thought there would be repercussions for not filling a Supreme Court seat for a year. There were none
Why should Democrats worry?
how do you figure that?considering how the vote went, I would have to suggest that you are on the wrong end of that argument.what it shows is that the American people want judges that at least give the impression that they would rule by the constitution instead of their own personal preferences on a subject.There are 23 reasons that Schumer will fail.
Care to guess what they are?
Thats right, 23 Democratic Senators up for re-election in 2018........
The 2016 election showed that the American people do not care if there are only 8 judges on the Supreme Court
If they did, they would have made the Republicans pay
obama wanted to stack the court with racist liberal anti American pieces of shit. The American public voted to stop him, and won.
Save us the Rightwing bullshit
Nobody wants your fundamentalist views of an 18th century Constitution
No go sit down, shut up and get ready for the ride. With luck maybe we can pass by some third world hell hole that would better comply with your desires.
The vote said the American public did not want Trump to pick the next justice
how do you figure he is 'figuring' anything at all?how do you figure that?The vote said the American public did not want Trump to pick the next justice
lol, yeah, that is a winner thing to do, dot.Do as that one Repub senator did- have a pending hold on EVERY nomination. Tie the process up in knots. Its what Repubs do so they should be used to it![]()
thats a good point, we could be witness to yet another mindless repetition of a liberal talking point picked up from the Huffington post or Democratic underground.how do you figure he is 'figuring' anything at all?how do you figure that?The vote said the American public did not want Trump to pick the next justice
I think that is where the smart money would be betting.thats a good point, we could be witness to yet another mindless repetition of a liberal talking point picked up from the Huffington post or Democratic underground..
Yeah, all the time, like even when there is not a nominee to consider?create a standing hold in the senate. Repubs do it all the time![]()
well basically, most of the politicians in washington are indeed clowns.We're all clowns to Don. Watch.
TrueI would just do as mcconnell did. He's a good teacher![]()
I actually thought there would be repercussions for not filling a Supreme Court seat for a year. There were none
Why should Democrats worry?
I would just sit on the nomination.
perhaps they decided they wanted to deal with someone who was sane.Read the papers tomorrow Of course our enemies are happy you voted trump president Remember the guy who wanted to bring us all together>>>> What a crock of sheetTonight? A month after the election? OK little one,
Ernie I respect your longevity BUT Trump is truly rowing with only one oar If he keeps this bs up when he's in our WH he'll be impeached Attacking Toyota?? who employs 100's of 1000's of Americans ?perhaps they decided they wanted to deal with someone who was sane.Read the papers tomorrow Of course our enemies are happy you voted trump president Remember the guy who wanted to bring us all together>>>> What a crock of sheetTonight? A month after the election? OK little one,
I do remember all of the terrorist nations, our sworn enemies being happy when obama was elected for his first term, If memory serves, I believe the went as far as sending him letters expressing their joy that the U.S was going to have leadership that would be open for the change here that they wanted, and would be sensitive to their own views on how the world should be.News coming out tonight that Russians dancing in the streets over Chumps election What garbage republicans gave us againhow may other (who exactly) would be denied (what exactly) if NY was.how many others would be denied if NY was?Trump could also make sure to veto anything that required funding for New York that was backed by Schumer. This would very quickly make the Senator ineffective and make it very hard for him to seek reelection.So Chucky has decided to block Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court vacancy. Good for him.
I suggest Trump play hardball with him. What I would do is nominate a Constitutionalist with decent Conservative credentials and see what Schumer does. If Democrats filibuster, withdraw the nomination and put up an even more Conservative jurist.
After 3 or 4 tries at this, Trump sits down with Senator Schumer and simply tells him to either play ball or there will be dire consequences.
If Trump knows anything, it's how to negotiate from a position of strength.
the object would be to hurt new york and have Schumers name associated with the damage. New York didnt go for Donald Trump anyway, its not like he is going to lose support from a state or anything.
Any praise world wide that Obama received was just the praise one leader sends another Of course his being the 1st black president had something to do with it Did Putin fall all over obama like he did trump?? and did obama kiss putins ass like trump is doing?I do remember all of the terrorist nations, our sworn enemies being happy when obama was elected for his first term, I memory serves, I believe the went as far as sending him letters expressing their joy that the U.S was going to have leadership that would be open for the change here that they wanted, and would be sensitive to their own views on how the world should be.News coming out tonight that Russians dancing in the streets over Chumps election What garbage republicans gave us againhow may other (who exactly) would be denied (what exactly) if NY was.how many others would be denied if NY was?Trump could also make sure to veto anything that required funding for New York that was backed by Schumer. This would very quickly make the Senator ineffective and make it very hard for him to seek reelection.So Chucky has decided to block Trump's nominee for the Supreme Court vacancy. Good for him.
I suggest Trump play hardball with him. What I would do is nominate a Constitutionalist with decent Conservative credentials and see what Schumer does. If Democrats filibuster, withdraw the nomination and put up an even more Conservative jurist.
After 3 or 4 tries at this, Trump sits down with Senator Schumer and simply tells him to either play ball or there will be dire consequences.
If Trump knows anything, it's how to negotiate from a position of strength.
the object would be to hurt new york and have Schumers name associated with the damage. New York didnt go for Donald Trump anyway, its not like he is going to lose support from a state or anything.
I think it will turn out better if a couple potato vodka trashed Russians dance in the street than it turned out with the leaders of terrorist nations praising obamas election.