Scientists Simulate "Runaway Greenhouse Effect" That Turns Earth Into Uninhabitable Hell

[ding]

CO2 feedback is logarithmic.

Right which is exactly why the recent warming trend isn't being cause by CO2.

 

[Crick]

Right which is exactly why the recent warming trend isn't being cause by CO2.

God are you fucking stupid. The logarithmic nature is why doubling gets us 3C and not 33C you lying piece of shit.

 

[ding]

God are you fucking stupid. The logarithmic nature is why doubling gets us 3C and not 33C you lying piece of shit.

From 280 ppm to 560 ppm is an incremental 1C. From 560 ppm to 1120 ppm is an incremental 1C.

 

[Crick]

From 280 ppm to 560 ppm is an incremental 1C. From 560 ppm to 1120 ppm is an incremental 1C.

God what a STUPID lying piece of shit.

 

[ding]

God what a STUPID lying piece of shit.

The greenhouse effect of gases is based upon the vibration of the molecules of the greenhouse gases. It's simple physics. It can literally be calculated. Why don't you know this already?

 

[HikerGuy83]

Right which is exactly why the recent warming trend isn't being cause by CO2.

Don't confuse them with science.

Al Gore told them and they have their lips forever attached to his oversized ass.

 

[Crick]

Don't confuse them with science.

Al Gore told them and they have their lips forever attached to his oversized ass.

It looks to me as it is YOUR lips in that position. The number of times that ANY non-denier here has brought up Al Gore on their own could be counted on the fingers of one hand.

 

[Crick]

The greenhouse effect of gases is based upon the vibration of the molecules of the greenhouse gases. It's simple physics. It can literally be calculated. Why don't you know this already?

1) That doesn't change the fact that you're a stupid lying piece of shit
2) You just attempted to claim that CO2 couldn't produce the warming with which it is credited. Now you tell us its simple physics. Are you suggesting that the world's scientists can't work a simple formula but you can? That would make you an egotisstical, stupid lying piece of shit.

 

[ding]

1) That doesn't change the fact that you're a stupid lying piece of shit
2) You just attempted to claim that CO2 couldn't produce the warming with which it is credited. Now you tell us its simple physics. Are you suggesting that the world's scientists can't work a simple formula but you can? That would make you an egotisstical, stupid lying piece of shit.

CO2 has produced about 0.5C of warming based upon its theoretical radiative forcing effect of vibrating atoms heating the surrounding atmosphere because of their movement which creates friction which produces heat. Learn some science.

 

[Crick]

CO2 has produced about 0.5C of warming based upon its theoretical radiative forcing effect of vibrating atoms heating the surrounding atmosphere because of their movement which creates friction which produces heat. Learn some science.

No one gives a flying fuck what you think, you stupid lying piece of shit.

 

[ding]

No one gives a flying fuck what you think, you stupid lying piece of shit.

The present warming trend started at the glacial maximum of the Little Ice Age which at least 150 years before the industrial revolution. The present temperature is still 2C cooler than previous interglacials. The warming trend isn't logarithmic so it's not being cause by the logarithmic relationship between CO2 and temperature.

 

[Crick]

The present warming trend started at the glacial maximum of the Little Ice Age which at least 150 years before the industrial revolution. The present temperature is still 2C cooler than previous interglacials. The warming trend isn't logarithmic so it's not being cause by the logarithmic relationship between CO2 and temperature.

We're in a COOLING trend you fucking idiot.

 

[ding]

We're in a COOLING trend you fucking idiot.

We're in an interglacial period, dumb dumb. The geologic record is littered with warming and cooling trends in glacial and interglacial periods. But for the last three million years the planet has been experiencing glacial cycles. And every time it warms back up to the pre-glacial period temperature, the planet reverses itself and plunges into another glacial period.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It has always been a good argument if the authority is actually an authority. Scientists are the authority on science. You morons don't actually understand how debate and logical fallacies work.

What terrifies scientists is that there may be tipping points in our climate.

 

[ding]

What terrifies scientists is that there may be tipping points in our climate.

Climate sensitivity to CO2 is idiotic.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Climate sensitivity to CO2 is idiotic.

The verbal sharts of uneducated slobs are not compelling, in a complicated scientific topic. Sorry.

 

[ding]

The verbal sharts of uneducated slobs are not compelling, in a complicated scientific topic. Sorry.

1. CO2 is a weak GHG of which its associated temperature is 1C per doubling of CO2. Which means its GHG effect DIMINISHES as its concentration increases. So not real conducive to the tipping point theory.
2. Due to convective currents, the entirety of GHG's in the atmosphere is only 44% effective at trapping its theoretical GHG effect at the surface. So also not not real conducive to the tipping point theory.

Let's assess each of our posts to see which one of us is sharting, shall we?

 

[Anomalism]

1. CO2 is a weak GHG of which its associated temperature is 1C per doubling of CO2. Which means its GHG effect DIMINISHES as its concentration increases. So not real conducive to the tipping point theory.
2. Due to convective currents, the entirety of GHG's in the atmosphere is only 44% effective at trapping its theoretical GHG effect at the surface. So also not not real conducive to the tipping point theory.

Let's assess each of our posts to see which one of us is sharting, shall we?

View attachment 881389

You should take your findings and go become a famous millionaire. The entire world will know your name after you bring these stunning revelations to the desks of real scientists. I'll await the news articles. Congratulations sir.

 

[ding]

You should take your findings and go become a famous millionaire. The entire world will know your name after you bring these stunning revelations to the desks of real scientists. I'll await the news articles. Congratulations sir.

It's not like it isn't already known.

 

[Crick]

It's not like it isn't already known.

By whom? You've been asked more than once for links to some sort of respectable source supporting your claim. I'd like to see one, for instance, that supports your claim that the glacial cycles of the past few million years are NOT the result of Milankovitch cycles. Or how about an actual PhD in a relevant field who describes the Earth as "bipolar".