danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #221
We have no choice but to view it as we understand it.All pure speculation. How conceited to think the entire universe is concentric to human existence on Earth.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We have no choice but to view it as we understand it.All pure speculation. How conceited to think the entire universe is concentric to human existence on Earth.
Have you ever noticed the striking similarity between the neural construct of the human brain synapses and the new more accurate pictures of the cosmic tentacles that are now being mapped as a whole diagram of the observable universe? How do we know there isn't a thought process taking place right in front of us? The very first time I saw a picture of the cosmic web it's the first thing that occurred to me.The theistic consensus is that the Earth is around six thousand years old.
Oh shit... and here I was thinking all this time that Pangea was a Soup and Bread restaurant chain.....my bad.![]()
The Bible does not mention Pangea or supercontinent by name, but mentions, "And God said, ‘Let the water under the sky be gathered to one place, and let dry ground appear.’ And it was so." The Earth was one supercontinent and then broke up into seven due to plate tectonics and the global flood. Creationist Alfred Wegener more fully developed this continental drift idea into the theory of plate tectonics.
The gif above doesn't do a good job of showing how the global flood waters rose from the "fountains of the deep." It shows how the continents broke apart, but does not show how the Earth became covered with water.
Would we be the equivalent to cells or organs?Have you ever noticed the striking similarity between the neural construct of the human brain synapses and the new more accurate pictures of the cosmic tentacles that are now being mapped as a whole diagram of the observable universe? How do we know there isn't a thought process taking place right in front of us? The very first time I saw a picture of the cosmic web it's the first thing that occurred to me.
![]()
The Strange Similarity of Neuron and Galaxy Networks
Your life’s memories could, in principle, be stored in the universe’s structure.nautil.us
JO
None of what you say is proof of anything. You are simply stating conclusions that you find on creationists sites. That is not science. It is speculation on geology that creationists try to fit to the bible.And so have I. The Himalayas were created by the fountains of the deep as well as the seven continents by plate tectonics catastrophism, i.e. global flood. The evidence is found in sedimentary layers, worldwide flood stories (based on a true event), land being displaced, the mid-Atlantic ridge circling the Earth, fossil remains of marine life atop the mountains, and more.
I can't help it if you have fallen for atheist lies and evolutionary science which real science does not back up.
Maybe viruses?Would we be the equivalent to cells or organs?
I think I read a theory that enables the potentiality that life originated from viruses.Maybe viruses?
Actually viruses are RNA relying on the mechanism of more complex hosts to replicate.I think I read a theory that enables the potentiality that life originated from viruses.
Would a longitudinal run of the Miller-Urey experiment potentially, eventually evolve a virus?Actually viruses are RNA relying on the mechanism of more complex hosts to replicate.
However I read something, like you suggest, that there has been some work that shows in certain cases that RNA encapsulated in lipids alone has the potential to replicate. It is chemically much more easy to form from the "primordial soup". It is similar to viruses without the need for a host and a cell penetration mechanism.
.
Yeah...that's kinda what I feel like when I look at it....Hell maybe we're an infection....lolWould we be the equivalent to cells or organs?
Or, we accept such tales and fables for what they are.Nobody said that the creative days were only 24 hours a piece..... the Hebrew word for day in the original Genesis text is not constrained to a solar day.....it could and likely does mean a period of thousands of years.
JO
Potentially, yes. But probably no. Even a M-U experiment in a huge space over a period of 100 years is no match for the surface of the earth over many millions of years.Would a longitudinal run of the Miller-Urey experiment potentially, eventually evolve a virus?
...to you.Yep everywhere we look out there the only thing that makes any sense at all is that somebody tampered with the surroundings to allow life.....
Why not? If they didn't mean "day", then why did they say day?Nobody said that the creative days were only 24 hours a piece.....
No. Or yes, in the sense that you can show the same not really striking similarity in any interconnected Network.Have you ever noticed the striking similarity between the neural construct of the human brain synapses and the new more accurate pictures of the cosmic tentacles that are now being mapped as a whole diagram of the observable universe?
It's hard evidence and much more than what you have with radiometric dating, the only evidence you have for evolution, or lies made up to support lies. It's such a weak argument that no one remembers the nerd who came up with radiometric dating.None of what you say is proof of anything. You are simply stating conclusions that you find on creationists sites. That is not science. It is speculation on geology that creationists try to fit to the bible.
.
Jeez buddy you are really ticked off. You are even pulling the Communism, Marxism. and Nazism cards. It would help if you sat in a quiet room and chanted ooommmmm.It's hard evidence and much more than what you have with radiometric dating, the only evidence you have for evolution, or lies made up to support lies. It's such a weak argument that no one remembers the nerd who came up with radiometric dating.
Evolution, evolutionary thinking, and radiometric dating fits perfectly. Creation science is much more conservative, not libturd.
The mid-Atlantic ridge shows that Pangea broke apart rapidly (in one year's time) and today we see the marine life fossils and mountain ranges underneath the oceans.Any studies showing how that could be accomplished in that relatively short time frame?
Jeez buddy you are really ticked off. You are even pulling the Communism, Marxism. and Nazism cards. It would help if you sat in a quiet room and chanted ooommmmm.
Radiometric dating is here to stay.
.
Yes, I think this is true. The 6K years is based on Biblical genealogies. If there are missing genealogies, then 6K years would be off. However, the Bible makes no mention of the age of the Earth because it isn't important. The age of the Earth could be 50,000 to 200,000 years. I think all we can get is a rough estimate, but it is still much younger than the 4.5 billion years old Earth lie of the evolutionists.The theistic consensus is that the Earth is around six thousand years old.