SCOTUS upholds Trump travel ban

[USApatriotz]

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Refugee Ban

Suck it ya bleeding heart leftists.

They need to make it PERMANENT like Japan & not permit ANY Muslim refugees!!

 

[Issa]

Oh, that means the refugees/terrorists won't be able to come to your country, steal trucks and run over the pedestrians? Or they won't be able to stab or to shoot everybody they want in your country like they have been successfully doing in Europe?

What a defeat for lefties and what a sad day for them... But what a victory for the whole country! Good job, SCOTUS and good job, Mr. President!

Sweetheart,

Only 7 or 8 countries are banned....there are over 50 other Muslims countries that aren't banned. For example Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from, Egypt where the mastermind of the hijacking and other high ranking of Al Qaeda came from, Jordan, ect....

Problem of solving terrorism is very simple and super easy fix. The US should stay away from the middle east....last time I chercke f no one wants to bomb new Zealand or Iceland...right?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

 

[Bassman007]

Justices allow Trump administration ban on most refugees

But but but.......................................LOL next

Brick wall stocks hit new all time high

 

[Conservative65]

Justices allow Trump administration ban on most refugees

But but but.......................................LOL next

Brick wall stocks hit new all time high

It would be interesting to know how many of those on the left that constantly clamor about "settled law" on things they support will accept this as the same and shut their holes like they expect the rest of us to do.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And hopefully will become permanent during Trump's term.

 

[ScienceRocks]

Can we just nuke the bastards and get it over with?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Oh, that means the refugees/terrorists won't be able to come to your country, steal trucks and run over the pedestrians? Or they won't be able to stab or to shoot everybody they want in your country like they have been successfully doing in Europe?

What a defeat for lefties and what a sad day for them... But what a victory for the whole country! Good job, SCOTUS and good job, Mr. President!

Sweetheart,

Only 7 or 8 countries are banned....there are over 50 other Muslims countries that aren't banned. For example Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from, Egypt where the mastermind of the hijacking and other high ranking of Al Qaeda came from, Jordan, ect....

Problem of solving terrorism is very simple and super easy fix. The US should stay away from the middle east....last time I chercke f no one wants to bomb new Zealand or Iceland...right?

Yes because, the inhabitants of New Zealand and Iceland are not Islamic terrorists.

 

[Bassman007]

Can we just nuke the bastards and get it over with?

Excellent nuke Mejico

Put down the pipe

 

[WEATHER53]

This thread is unable to maintain the top of the line status it deserves because No liberals have any rebuttal they can offer
Your "Make American Lousy " ship has run aground

 

[Issa]

Oh, that means the refugees/terrorists won't be able to come to your country, steal trucks and run over the pedestrians? Or they won't be able to stab or to shoot everybody they want in your country like they have been successfully doing in Europe?

What a defeat for lefties and what a sad day for them... But what a victory for the whole country! Good job, SCOTUS and good job, Mr. President!

Sweetheart,

Only 7 or 8 countries are banned....there are over 50 other Muslims countries that aren't banned. For example Saudi Arabia where most of the hijackers came from, Egypt where the mastermind of the hijacking and other high ranking of Al Qaeda came from, Jordan, ect....

Problem of solving terrorism is very simple and super easy fix. The US should stay away from the middle east....last time I chercke f no one wants to bomb new Zealand or Iceland...right?

Yes because, the inhabitants of New Zealand and Iceland are not Islamic terrorists.

There are Muslims in both. US involvement in the middle East attracts terrorists....hard to understand?

 

[P@triot]

Supreme Court Issues Temporary Order Upholding Trump Refugee Ban

Suck it ya bleeding heart leftists.

^

^^^This^^^ is what happens when a parasite doesn't get his or her way. Complete and total meltdown which includes idiotic and nonsensical screams of "nazi" and "racism" (both of which are left-wing).

 

[P@triot]

This thread is unable to maintain the top of the line status it deserves because No liberals have any rebuttal they can offer

Well...if we were to be honest here...I've never seen a thread where progressives were actually able to offer a rebuttal. That's what happens when you make decisions based on emotion instead of logic and reason. It leaves one without the ability to make a case.

 

[Wacky Quacky]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

Laws cannot be made regarding religions and citizens. Foreign parties are not afforded the same thing

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

No, I think it is you who should try to keep up.

Commie leftist judges are bastardizing our constitution to stop the Trump agenda. It's purely political with them. It has nothing to do with the constitution; the are only using it to try and disguise being an activist judge.

Judges are not to make law, judges are to judge whether the laws are followed properly. US immigration code 1182 was passed by Congress many years ago. And as the law states, a US President can ban any group of people for any reason and for as long as he feels necessary.

People from other countries do not have our Constitutional rights even if that was the case. No foreigner has the right to enter this country via our US Constitution.

 

[Thinker101]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

The government is not establishing laws for or against a religion...please try to keep up.

 

[WEATHER53]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

No, I think it is you who should try to keep up.

Commie leftist judges are bastardizing our constitution to stop the Trump agenda. It's purely political with them. It has nothing to do with the constitution; the are only using it to try and disguise being an activist judge.

Judges are not to make law, judges are to judge whether the laws are followed properly. US immigration code 1182 was passed by Congress many years ago. And as the law states, a US President can ban any group of people for any reason and for as long as he feels necessary.

People from other countries do not have our Constitutional rights even if that was the case. No foreigner has the right to enter this country via our US Constitution.

There are some big time dummies here who believe personage in the process of illegally entering the USA are legally entititled to all laws protections and privledges thst US citizens are

 

[Wacky Quacky]

The Supreme Court only allowed half of the ban to be temporarily reinstated, and Republicans blow their load screaming victory?

Maybe you guys should wait until after their ruling, when they argue over whether or not the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against muslims.

Good luck with that one:

View attachment 148981

Which doesn't supercede the 1st Amendment. The government cannot establish laws for or against a religion. That's the whole debate over the travel ban, please try to keep up.

No, I think it is you who should try to keep up.

Commie leftist judges are bastardizing our constitution to stop the Trump agenda. It's purely political with them. It has nothing to do with the constitution; the are only using it to try and disguise being an activist judge.

Just because you don't like their decision, doesn't mean a judge is an activist. I don't give a shit about nonsensical partisan theater or illogical discussions about left vs right. If it's right, it's right; if it's wrong, it's wrong.

Judges are not to make law, judges are to judge whether the laws are followed properly. US immigration code 1182 was passed by Congress many years ago. And as the law states, a US President can ban any group of people for any reason and for as long as he feels necessary.

The president is not a dictator. They have to follow the constitution just like everybody else. And the constitution clearly states that laws cannot be made "Respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". The president cannot make a travel ban that directly discriminates against muslims. And while his travel ban may not directly call out muslims, every country he listed, plus his past remarks, has lead several judges to believe that Trump is directly discriminating against muslims.

People from other countries do not have our Constitutional rights even if that was the case. No foreigner has the right to enter this country via our US Constitution.

This country, other countries, doesn't matter: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

Just because you don't like their decision, doesn't mean a judge is an activist. I don't give a shit about nonsensical partisan theater or illogical discussions about left vs right. If it's right, it's right; if it's wrong, it's wrong.

Yes, if a judge rules that a United States President cannot exercise existing laws, then that judge is an activist.

The president is not a dictator. They have to follow the constitution just like everybody else. And the constitution clearly states that laws cannot be made "Respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof". The president cannot make a travel ban that directly discriminates against muslims. And while his travel ban may not directly call out muslims, every country he listed, plus his past remarks, has lead several judges to believe that Trump is directly discriminating against muslims.

Yes, he can make a travel ban because US code 1182 allows him to. Don't you know how to read? A dictator is one who rules outside of our laws or disobeys our laws--not one who acts within our laws.

This country, other countries, doesn't matter: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof"

Great. Now find me one word in his executive order that even hinted at religion. It's not there. The judge made it up. There is no mention of religion in any of his EC's that were stopped.