Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Dumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
We just can't find them.
Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
Mr. Westwall, you are one silly ass. Even the equations we use in physics are nothing but models of the real world, and many come with warnings concerning the parameters for which they can be used with any accuracy. And, when you are using models created by past observations, and the world is in the process of change, then those models are no longer that accurate, because the parameters are changing.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.
Just sayin...
That is how science works. Or would you rather wait until Phrump tells another one of his lies. You believe him but not science. You are blissfully ignorant. ENJOY YOUR FANTASY LAND.
No, it's not. Science is about facts and the observation of natural processes. Computer models are neither. Try again.
WMaybe you need to learn some basics. When people like you were saying that nothing at all was happening, Dr. Hansen made so pretty unequivical predictions concerning the opening of the Northwest Passage. Yes, he got it wrong. It happened far sooner than he estimated. So the Cryosphere is more sensitive to temperature increase than we thought.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Wait until Mt. Rainier blows its top. Goodbye Seattle, Vancouver and Portland.
Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.
Just sayin...
And, by the way, where the hell is that damned cooling, Mr. Westwall? Going to be in the 80's here next week. That is some cooling.
Of course he understands what he is saying. You are the one that does not understand basic science.Do you understand what you are saying? The increased temperature of the Arctic is causing FREEZING temperatures? If you increase the temperature of your house, does the temperature of the house go up or down? Think about it... If the temperature of the Arctic is making the ice melt(above 32 degrees) how can temperatures below 32 degrees come from the Arctic? Such stupid people who vote dumbocrat.It's probably freezing because a big lobe of the polar vortex brought an Arctic air mass your way and simultaneously took an equatorial mass of warm air into the Alaska, the American northwest and the Arctic. The net effect on global temperatures is zip. The cause for that big lobe of cold air? The increased temperature in the Arctic reducing the difference between their and the poles. Ring your bell twice if you think you understand.
The Great Lakes Are Still Almost Half Frozen, And It Could Affect The Environment For YearsMaybe you need to learn some basics. When people like you were saying that nothing at all was happening, Dr. Hansen made so pretty unequivical predictions concerning the opening of the Northwest Passage. Yes, he got it wrong. It happened far sooner than he estimated. So the Cryosphere is more sensitive to temperature increase than we thought.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.
Just sayin...
And, by the way, where the hell is that damned cooling, Mr. Westwall? Going to be in the 80's here next week. That is some cooling.
Weather eventThe Great Lakes Are Still Almost Half Frozen, And It Could Affect The Environment For Years.
Weather eventGreat Lakes are freezing fast
Tony Wittkowski and Bob Gross, Michigan.com 9:05 a.m. EST February 20, 2015
Dumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
We just can't find them.
Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
The climatologists predictions have mostly been on the conservative side. And the ice melt worldwide is exceeding their worst case estimates.
Dumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
We just can't find them.
Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
The climatologists predictions have mostly been on the conservative side. And the ice melt worldwide is exceeding their worst case estimates.
Gave you a link tard. Try to fucking disprove it...
Study Shows Global Warming Data Skewed by Bad MonitoringDumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
We just can't find them.
Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
The climatologists predictions have mostly been on the conservative side. And the ice melt worldwide is exceeding their worst case estimates.
Al Jazeera Gore made 1/2 billion dollars from energy taxes that were FORCED upon US. Why don't the 99%'ers go after Al for his obscene profits? Why is it Al Gore has mansions that burn energy like a small city and the left doesn't do shit about it?That problem of poorly sited stations thanks to “encroaching urbanity” — locations near asphalt, air conditioning and airports — is well established. A sensor in Marysville, Calif., sits in a parking lot at a fire station next to an air conditioner exhaust and a cell tower. One in Redding, Calif., is housed in a box that also contains a halogen light bulb, which could emit warmth directly onto the gauge.
Liberals are all about "DO AS I SAY, NOT AS I DO". They can live in mansions, fly around in private jets, ride in limo's while the rest of us must give up our energy usage. Stupid people vote Dumbocrat.The report says that Gore’s house used 221,000 kwh of electricity in 2006, more than 20 times the national average of 10,656 kwh. The report says the natural gas usage of Gore’s home is high as well, and that the Gores spent more than $30,000 in combined electricity and natural gas bills in 2006.
but science in the big boy and girl world takes the observed data and tracks that against the models and then adjust the models to better define future projections, yet in your science world your creepy science takes the observed data and instead of updating the models, they update the observed to match the models. how fked up is that in your world. Tell me that's scientific. Please,Mr. Westwall, you are one silly ass. Even the equations we use in physics are nothing but models of the real world, and many come with warnings concerning the parameters for which they can be used with any accuracy. And, when you are using models created by past observations, and the world is in the process of change, then those models are no longer that accurate, because the parameters are changing.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.
Just sayin...
That is how science works. Or would you rather wait until Phrump tells another one of his lies. You believe him but not science. You are blissfully ignorant. ENJOY YOUR FANTASY LAND.
No, it's not. Science is about facts and the observation of natural processes. Computer models are neither. Try again.
Now you have in the past referred to the Maunder Minimum for predicting a cooling. What was that but a prediction based on a model? And a very poor one as we can see from the last two years and the present year.
Of course he understands what he is saying. You are the one that does not understand basic science.Do you understand what you are saying? The increased temperature of the Arctic is causing FREEZING temperatures? If you increase the temperature of your house, does the temperature of the house go up or down? Think about it... If the temperature of the Arctic is making the ice melt(above 32 degrees) how can temperatures below 32 degrees come from the Arctic? Such stupid people who vote dumbocrat.It's probably freezing because a big lobe of the polar vortex brought an Arctic air mass your way and simultaneously took an equatorial mass of warm air into the Alaska, the American northwest and the Arctic. The net effect on global temperatures is zip. The cause for that big lobe of cold air? The increased temperature in the Arctic reducing the difference between their and the poles. Ring your bell twice if you think you understand.
that door swings both ways tooth. You haven't presented any predictions that have come true. BTW, I do believe there have been many posts regarding failed predictions, I believe skooks has presented them in the past. To restart a new thread over and over is funny.So, we keep asking, but the deniers are still unable to show any failed consensus predictions from actual climate scientists.
They are, of course, quite creative with their deflections. Andaronjim even managed to somehow bring both racism and Gore into it.
Mr. Westwall, you are one silly ass. Even the equations we use in physics are nothing but models of the real world, and many come with warnings concerning the parameters for which they can be used with any accuracy. And, when you are using models created by past observations, and the world is in the process of change, then those models are no longer that accurate, because the parameters are changing.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
Deny what exactly? That the "study" is based entirely on computer models thus is nothing more than fiction? It is you who need to learn some basics dude.
Just sayin...
That is how science works. Or would you rather wait until Phrump tells another one of his lies. You believe him but not science. You are blissfully ignorant. ENJOY YOUR FANTASY LAND.
No, it's not. Science is about facts and the observation of natural processes. Computer models are neither. Try again.
Now you have in the past referred to the Maunder Minimum for predicting a cooling. What was that but a prediction based on a model? And a very poor one as we can see from the last two years and the present year.
Climate Change is not a day to day event. The change will take decades and centuries, but it will come. Thankfully, alternative energy sources, conservation, and energy policies of the last 7 years have reduced our dependence on carbon based fuels. The planet has a chance, but the Repooblicans fight every inch of the way.
Shot:Dumb fuck, why don't you ever link to something that would back up your silly lies? Because there is nothing for you to link to. People like you are stupid beyond belief.Yep, 50 million people who's homes were destroyed by climate change.Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
We just can't find them.
Its ok in 2020 then in 2040 , then in 2060..... they will just copy and paste the same report just change the dates like a bad romance novel.
The climatologists predictions have mostly been on the conservative side. And the ice melt worldwide is exceeding their worst case estimates.
Wow, how scientific. Can't prove anything so just demonize those that don't worship your idols.We are trying to compare the antis, whose average IQ is in the double digits with PHds whose average IQ is triple digit. We cannot expect many of the Antis to understand.
So, we keep asking, but the deniers are still unable to show any failed consensus predictions from actual climate scientists.
They are, of course, quite creative with their deflections. Andaronjim even managed to somehow bring both racism and Gore into it.
Scientists say Antarctic melting could double sea level rise. Here’s what that looks like.
And still the RW lugnuts deny...deny...deny. Thankfully, their numbers are diminishing...
I found it.....
Just a rethread of a 2005 UN failed perdiction.
Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry
United Nations “Climate Refugees”
In 2005, the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) warned that imminent sea-level rises, increased hurricanes, and desertification caused by “man-made global warming” would lead to massive population disruptions. In a handy map, the organization highlighted areas that were supposed to be particularly vulnerable in terms of producing “climate refugees.” Especially at risk were regions such as the Caribbean and low-lying Pacific islands, along with coastal areas.
The 2005 UNEP predictions claimed that, by 2010, some 50 million “climate refugees” would be frantically fleeing from those regions of the globe. However, not only did the areas in question fail to produce a single “climate refugee,” by 2010, population levels for those regions were actually still soaring. In many cases, the areas that were supposed to be producing waves of “climate refugees” and becoming uninhabitable turned out to be some of the fastest-growing places on Earth.
In the Bahamas, for example, according to the 2010 census, there was a major increase in population, going from around 300,000 in 2000 to more than 350,000 by 2010. The population of St. Lucia, meanwhile, grew by five percent during the same period. The Seychelles grew by about 10 percent. The Solomon Islands also witnessed a major population boom during that time frame, gaining another 100,000 people, or an increase of about 25 percent.
.
