SECESSION!!!!

[bripat9643]

Which means? You lack character to stand by a conviction.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't. You just hide it with your new views on secession. If you want to secede go ahead and do it but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

Hey stupid f*ck, learn some history.

No one here has condoned slavery. You're unhinged.

I don't want to secede.

I want to be kicked out.

I have always had a firm conviction that secession was wrong.

A constitutional convention called by the states could have dissolved the Union peacefully.

The only thing preventing the Union from dissolving peacefully was Lincoln's refusal to allow it by invading Virginia.

 

[bripat9643]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

 

[Roadrunner]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

Fact is, Southern hotheads fired on a useless old fort, which could have been left there for ever and eternity, in a provocative
act, and it backfired.

 

[Roadrunner]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

The consequences weren't.

 

[bripat9643]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

Fact is, Southern hotheads fired on a useless old fort, which could have been left there for ever and eternity, in a provocative
act, and it backfired.

That may be the case. However, it doesn't alter the fact that they had a perfect right to fire on it and Lincoln had no right to keep Union forces stationed there or to send them supplies.

 

[bripat9643]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

The consequences weren't.

Even if true, that's irrelevant.

 

[Roadrunner]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

The consequences weren't.

Even if true, that's irrelevant.

Is the disasterous asswhuppin' from which we have never recovered irrelevant too?

 

[boilermaker55]

Thank you for confirming that, Yes you do advocate Slavery.
Dumb ass!
You don't know if you are punched or bored.

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

 

[boilermaker55]

NO! its very relevant. With your pro-confederate stance

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

The consequences weren't.

Even if true, that's irrelevant.

 

[reconmark]

Roto and Recon: The two of you need to take your snuff pornography to some filthy motel room where you can go crazy on each other and blow off the obvious sexual energy you have built up for one another. Both of you deviant fucks might consider leaving the rest of humanity out of your vile photo exhibition.

Both of you:

If factual photos of the Civil War offend you...may I suggest you stick your head up your ass.

Fuck you and your fellow pornographer.

Fuck You...if the photos offend you, stick your head up your ass.

You and your wannabe reb boyfriend should share pornographic snuff photos in private. No one else wants to be subjected to the level of morally bankrupt idiocy in which you both specialize.

Please have a tall cool glass of STFU!!!!!...no need to keep posting the same thing over and over.

 

[bripat9643]

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.


That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

Thanks for granting your permission...

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

The consequences weren't.

Even if true, that's irrelevant.

Is the disasterous asswhuppin' from which we have never recovered irrelevant too?

It's irrelevant to the issue of whether Lincoln acted legally when he did, and to whether Lincoln is a scumbag tyrant dictator. Do you think whether a man is guilty relevant to the issue of whether the government acted legally when it executed him?

 

[Unkotare]

The South tried to peacefully and legally withdraw. .

The FACTS of history prove that a lie.

Nope, they prove it to be the indisputable truth.

The 'secession' was not legal, and firing upon a federal fort was not peaceful. You are wrong on all counts, Johnny Reb.

 

[bripat9643]

Thank you for confirming that, Yes you do advocate Slavery.
Dumb ass!
You don't know if you are punched or bored.

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

Nope, I sure as hell didn't advocate slavery.

 

[Unkotare]

...no need to keep posting the same thing over and over.

The same thing over and over like the pornographic snuff photos you and your boyfriend Johnny Reb use to get 'ready' for the evening, scumbag?

 

[reconmark]

Can anyone post a definitive date when the "new" secessionist are going to start their civil war or is this simply an exercise in modern day losers romanticizing about historical losers...

 

[reconmark]

...no need to keep posting the same thing over and over.

The same thing over and over like the pornographic snuff photos you and your boyfriend Johnny Reb use to get 'ready' for the evening, scumbag?

I see you haven't partaken of the drink yet...

 

[boilermaker55]

Thank you one more time for siding with the confederates and their sympathizers.

Thank you for confirming that, Yes you do advocate Slavery.
Dumb ass!
You don't know if you are punched or bored.

And again, you hide behind your pro-confederate theory.
nice try beavis real friend.

From everything posted by you and others with your going back to 1860's, the hell you don't.

No one here has ever said anything about condoning slavery, scooter...quit exaggerating.

You just hide it with your new views on secession.

That doesn't even make sense. Try again.

If you want to secede go ahead and do it

Thanks for granting your permission...

but quite referring to the 1860's and try to say it was the North that made the wrong move.

lincoln lied in his comments before congress in 1848 and he lied in his first inaugural address. Want me to post them again? Let me know..

the north sent troops and ships to invade the south because the people decided to legally and peacefully withdraw from the union. No other reason...
Southern patriots then repelled the invaders at fort sumter but lincoln now had his casus belli to make war on civilians...fellow american civilians.
We haven't forgotten.


Those are facts, son.

The facts are "pro-Confederate," asshole.

Nope, I sure as hell didn't advocate slavery.

 

[Unkotare]

...no need to keep posting the same thing over and over.

The same thing over and over like the pornographic snuff photos you and your boyfriend Johnny Reb use to get 'ready' for the evening, scumbag?

I see you haven't partaken of the drink yet...

I see you've been milking your boyfriend Johnny Reb for pages and pages here now. You two are made for each other.

 

[reconmark]

...no need to keep posting the same thing over and over.

The same thing over and over like the pornographic snuff photos you and your boyfriend Johnny Reb use to get 'ready' for the evening, scumbag?

I see you haven't partaken of the drink yet...

I see you've been milking your boyfriend Johnny Reb for pages and pages here now. You two are made for each other.

I sense a tone of envy...by all mean's bare your hindquarters for "johnny reb" you seem thoroughly taken.
Excuse me though, I don't indulge.

 

[reconmark]

As Harris saw things, “Our fathers made this a government for the white man, rejecting the negro as an ignorant, inferior, barbarian race, incapable of self-government, and not, therefore, entitled to be associated with the white man upon terms of civil, political, or social equality.” Lincoln and his followers, he stated, aimed to “overturn and strike down this great feature of our union and to substitute in its stead their new theory of the universal equality of the black and white races.” For Harris, the choice was clear. Mississippi would “rather see the last of her race, men, women, and children, immolated in one common funeral pyre than see them subjugated to the degradation of civil, political and social equality with the negro race.” The Georgia legislature ordered the printing of a thousand copies of his speech.


Poor white ignorant southerners lost everything simply yo be able to falsely claim superiority to Black people because the wealthy clearly mandated their inferiority to the wealthy...
Stupid assed rock kickers...